Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2475-2483

  Sohns, Christian ^a   Scherrer, Martin ^a   Staab, Wieland ^a   Obenauer, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast tumours; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 83555165038     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2210-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Y Aubard D Genet JL Eyraud, et al. 2002 Impact of screening on breast cancer detection. Retrospective comparative study of two periods ten years apart Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23 37 41 11876389 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387ktlyjtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34178098)
2. RL Gutierrez WB DeMartini PR Eby, et al. 2009 BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for non mass like enhancement AJR 193 994 1000 19770321 10.2214/AJR.08.1983
3. LW Nunes MD Schnall SG Orel, et al. 1997 Breast MR imaging: interpretation model Radiology 202 833 841 9051042 1:STN:280: DyaK2s3gtlCksg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27093463)
4. LW Nunes MD Schnall SG Orel 2001 Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model Radiology 219 484 494 11323476 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mt1eitw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32336366)
5. MD Schnall J Blume DA Bluemke, et al. 2006 Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study Radiology 238 42 53 16373758 10.1148/radiol.2381042117 (Pubitemid 43010579)
6. M Benndorf PA Baltzer T Vag, et al. 2010 Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes Acta Radiol 51 715 721 20707656 10.3109/02841851.2010.497164
7. S Obenauer C Sohns C Werner, et al. 2006 Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories Breast J 12 16 19 16409582 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00185.x (Pubitemid 43381445)
8. American College of Radiology: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 3. Auflage, Reston 1998
9. MD Schnall DM Ikeda 1999 Lesion diagnosis working group on breast MR Radiology 153 243 244
10. DM Ikeda MN Hylton K Kinkel, et al. 2001 Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies J Magn Reson Imaging 13 889 95 11382949 10.1002/jmri.1127 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3pvFeisA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32479947)
11. L Liberman EA Morris DD Dershaw AF Abramson LK Tan, et al. 2003 Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast AJR 181 519 525 12876038 (Pubitemid 36909502)
12. M Tozaki K Fukuda 2006 High-spatial-resolution MRT of non-mass like breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRT descriptors AJR 187 330 337 16861534 10.2214/AJR.05.0998 (Pubitemid 44148274)
13. CK Kuhl 2007 Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications Radiology 244 672 691 17709824 10.1148/radiol.2443051661 (Pubitemid 47292079)
14. M Tozaki T Igarashi K Fukuda 2006 Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRT, descriptors for focal breast masses Magn Reson Med Sci 5 7 15 16785722 10.2463/mrms.5.7
15. PAT Baltzer M Benndorf M Dietzel, et al. 2010 False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptory study AJR 194 1658 1663 20489110 10.2214/AJR.09.3486
16. M Tozaki T Igarashi K Fukuda 2006 Breast MRT using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement AJR 187 313 321 16861532 10.2214/AJR.05.0881 (Pubitemid 44148272)