Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: Impact on diagnostic performance

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,b   Liu, Franklin ^c   Peacock, Sue ^a,b   Eby, Peter R ^d   Gutierrez, Robert L ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b  

^a Seattle Cancer Care Alliance ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Southdale Medical Center   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; MRI; Parenchymal enhancement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; CANCER REGISTRY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; SEER PROGRAM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84859128173     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.6272     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclicalphase dependency. Radiology 1997; 203:137-144
2. Müller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhauser K, Stoll P, Dietz K, Claussen CD. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. Radiology 1997; 203:145-149
3. Reichenbach JR, Przetak C, Klinger G, Kaiser WA. Assessment of breast tissue changes on hormonal replacement therapy using MRI: a pilot study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23:407-413
4. Delille JP, Slanetz PJ, Yeh ED, Kopans DB, Halpern EF, Garrido L. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women: breast tissue perfusion determined with MR imaging - initial observations. Radiology 2005; 235:36-41
5. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Website. www.naaccr.org/. Accessed August 22, 2011
6. D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
7. Wei J, Chan HP, Helvie MA, et al. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. Med Phys 2004; 31:933-942
8. Talele AC, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED, Kopans DB. The lactating breast: MRI findings and literature review. Breast J 2003; 9:237-240
9. Söderqvist G, Isaksson E, von Schoultz B, Carlstrom K, Tani E, Skoog L. Proliferation of breast epithelial cells in healthy women during the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:123-128
10. Ciatto S, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening. Br J Cancer 2004; 90:393-396
11. Moskowitz M, Gartside P, McLaughlin C. Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. Radiology 1980; 134:293-295
12. Threatt B, Norbeck JM, Ullman NS, Kummer R, Roselle P. Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer. Cancer 1980; 45:2550-2556
13. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:227-236
14. Whitehead J, Carlile T, Kopecky KJ, et al. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns: a study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller. Cancer 1985; 56:1280-1286
15. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617
16. van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:267-271
17. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225:165-175
18. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:1081-1087
19. Ko ES, Lee BH, Choi HY, Kim RB, Noh WC. Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80:719-723
20. Hambly NM, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Brennan S, Morris EA. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up. AJR 2011; 196:218-224
21. Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J. Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer? Eur Radiol 2011; 21:2261-2267
22. Kopans D. Breast imaging, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2007
23. Cubuk R, Tasali N, Narin B, Keskiner F, Celik L, Guney S. Correlation between breast density in mammography and background enhancement in MR mammography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2010; 115:434-441