MR imaging features of pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 405-413

  Okafuji, Takashi ^a   Yabuuchi, Hidetake ^a   Sakai, Shuji ^b   Soeda, Hiroyasu ^a   Matsuo, Yoshio ^a   Inoue, Takahiro ^a   Hatakenaka, Masamitsu ^a   Takahashi, Naoki ^a   Kuroki, Syoji ^a   Tokunaga, Eriko ^a   Honda, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast; Magnetic resonance (MR); Neoplasm

Indexed keywords

HISTOLOGY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SURGERY; TUMORS;

HETEROGENEOUS ENHANCEMENT; INTERNAL MASS ENHANCEMENTS; KINETIC CURVE PATTERNS; STIR T2-WEIGHTED IMAGES;

DISEASES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINETICS; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33751180353     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. World Health Organization Histological Typing of Breast Tumors. Tumori 1982; 68: 181-198.
2. Toikkanen S., and Kujari H. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic analysis of 61 cases with long term follow-up. Hum Pathol 20 (1989) 758-764
3. Silverberg S.G., Kay S., Chitale A.R., Levitt S.H., and Levitt S.H. Colloid carcinoma of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 55 (1971) 355-363
4. Rasmussen B.B., Rose C., and Christensen I. Prognostic factors in primary mucinous breast carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 87 (1987) 155-160
5. Komenaka I.K., El-Tamer M.B., Troxel A., et al. Pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg 187 (2004) 528-532
6. Paramo J.C., Wilson C., Velarde D., Giraldo J., Poppiti R.J., and Mesko T.W. Pure mucinous carcinoma of the breast: is axillary staging necessary?. Ann Surg Oncol 9 (2002) 161-164
7. Anan K., Mitsuyama S., Tamae K., et al. Pathological features of mucinous carcinoma of the breast are favourable for breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 27 (2001) 459-463
8. Thurman S.A., Schnitt S.J., Connolly J.L., et al. Outcome after breast-conserving therapy for patients with stage I or II musinous, medullary, or tubular breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Onncl Biol Phys 59 (2003) 152-159
9. Holland R., Connolly J.L., Gelman R., et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol 8 (1990) 113-118
10. Bartelink H., Borger J.H., van Dongen J.A., and Peter J.L. The impact of tumor size and histology on local control after breast conserving therapy. Radiother Oncol 11 (1988) 297-303
11. Elling D., Vesper A.S., Fiedler B., Martin H., and Krocker J. Intraductal component in invasive breast cancer: analysis of 250 resected surgical specimens. The Breast 10 (2001) 405-410
12. Renshaw A.A. Can mucinous lesions of the breast be reliably diagnosed by core needle biopsy?. Am J Clin Pathol 118 (2002) 82-84
13. Lam W.W., Shu W.C., Tse G.M., Ma T.K., and Tang A.P. Role of fine needle aspiration and tru cut biopsy in diagnosis of musinous carcinoma of breast - from a radiologist's perspective. J Clin Img 30 (2006) 6-10
14. Pina Insausti L.J., and Soga Garcia E. Mucinous breast carcinoma showing as a cluster of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol 8 (1998) 1666-1668
15. Cardenosa G., Doudna C., and Eklund G.W. Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: clinical and mammographic findings in 10 patients. AJR 162 (1994) 1077-1079
16. Matsuda M., Yoshimoto M., Iwase T., et al. Mammographic and Clinicopathological Features of Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast. Breast Cancer 7 (2000) 65-70
17. Chopra S., Evans A.J., Pinder S.E., et al. Pure Mucinous Breast Cancer-Mammographic and Ultrasound Findings. Clin Radiol 51 (1996) 421-424
18. Memis A., Ozdemir N., Parildar M., Ustun E.E., and Erhan Y. Mucinous (colloid) breast cancer: mammographic and US features with histologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 35 (2000) 39-43
19. Lam W.W.M., Chu W.C.W., TSE G.M., and Ma T.K. Sonographic appearance of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR 182 (2004) 1069-1074
20. Dhillon R., Depree P., Metcalf C., and Wylie E. Screen-detected mucinous carcinoma: potential for delayed diagnosis. Clin Radiol 61 (2006) 423-430
21. Kawashima M., Tamaki Y., Nonaka T., et al. MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. AJR 179 (2002) 179-183
22. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 200 (1996) 639-649
23. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging. 1st ed. (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
24. Ikeda D.M., Hylton N.M., Kinkel K., et al. Development, standerization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. JMRI 13 (2001) 889-895
25. Isomoto I., Koshiishi T., Okimoto T., et al. Evaluation of strongly hyperintense area in breast lesions on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images correlated with histopathology [in Japanese]. Nippon Acta Radiol 64 (2004) 99-106
26. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 (1999) 101-110
27. Kuhl C.K., Schild H.H., and Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contras-enhanced MR imaging of the breast; trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236 (2005) 789-800
28. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectual and dynamic features at breast MR imaging; multicenter study. Radiology 238 (2006) 42-53
29. Buadu L.D., Murakami J., Murayama S., et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. JCAT 21 (1997) 421-430
30. Liebermann L., Morris E.A., Lee M.J.Y., et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR 179 (2002) 171-178
31. Matsubayashi R., Matsuo Y., Edakuni G., Satoh T., Tokunaga O., and Kudo S. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contras-enhanced mr images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 217 (2000) 841-848
32. Wedegartner U., Bick U., Wortler K., Rummery E., and Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 11 (2001) 1645-1650
33. Weinstein D., Strano S., Cohen P., Fields S., Gomori J.M., and Degani H. Breast dibroadenoma; mapping of pathophysiologic features with three-time-point, contrast-enhanced MR imaging-pilot study. Radiology 210 (1999) 233-240
34. Boetes C., Barentsz J.O., Mus R.D., et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced Turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193 (1994) 777-781
35. Satake H., Shimamoto K., Sawaki A., et al. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 10 (2000) 1726-1732
36. Gilles R., Zafrani B., Guinebretiere J.M., et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 196 (1995) 415-419