MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: Predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 193, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 826-831

  Wang, Lilian C ^a   DeMartini, Wendy B ^a,b   Partridge, Savannah C ^a,b   Peacock, Sue ^a,b   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided evaluation; MRI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; KINETICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 69949094337     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1335     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lehman CD, Gastonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303 (Pubitemid 46513295)
2. Fischer U, Kopka L, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E. Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:1002-1005 (Pubitemid 127537120)
3. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213:881-888
4. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D, et al. Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 2005; 92:9-15 (Pubitemid 41416422)
5. Lee S, Orel S, Woo I, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003; 226:773-778 (Pubitemid 36259154)
6. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, et al. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR 2003; 180:333-341 (Pubitemid 36135009)
7. Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2005; 103:1898-1905 (Pubitemid 40563263)
8. Warner E, Plewes D, Hill K, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292:1317-1325 (Pubitemid 39223222)
9. Kriege M, Brekelmans C, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:427-437 (Pubitemid 38988592)
10. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, et al. Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 1999; 212:543-549
11. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology 1997; 205:437-440 (Pubitemid 27467322)
12. Cher DJ, Conwell JA, Mandel JS. MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: meta-analysis and implications. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47:367-380 (Pubitemid 32946667)
13. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features of breast MR: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238:42-53 (Pubitemid 43010579)
14. Macura KJ, Ouwerkerk R, Jacobs MA, et al. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. RadioGraphics 2006; 26:1719-1734
15. Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR 2006; 187:51-56 (Pubitemid 46100145)
16. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007; 244:94-103 (Pubitemid 46981962)
17. Hauth EA, Stockamp CS, Maderwald S, et al. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Clin Imaging 2006; 30:160-165
18. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
19. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999; 211:101-110 (Pubitemid 29161739)
20. Schnall MD, Rosten S, Englander S, et al. A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:591-597 (Pubitemid 32592160)
21. Szabó BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol 2003; 44:379-386
22. Tozaki M. Interpretation of breast MRI: correlation of kinetic and morphological parameters with pathological findings. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004; 3:189-197
23. Gribbestad I, Nilsen G, Fjosne H, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncol 1992; 31:833-842 (Pubitemid 23089754)
24. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR 2000; 175:35-43 (Pubitemid 30415534)
25. Mussarakis S, Gibbs P, Horsman A. Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumors: quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI. J Comput Assist Tomog 1998; 22:35-46 (Pubitemid 28087317)
26. Kaiser W, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA - preliminary observations. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686 (Pubitemid 19062582)
27. Stomper P, Herman S, Klippenstein D, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995; 197:387-395
28. Knopp M, Weiss E, Sinn H, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10:260-266 (Pubitemid 29463108)
29. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997; 202:413-420
30. Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007; 245:684-691 (Pubitemid 350127338)
31. Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, et al. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2007; 13:545-550 (Pubitemid 350045709)