Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 264, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 51-58

  Mahoney, Mary C ^a   Gatsonis, Constantine ^b   Hanna, Lucy ^b   DeMartini, Wendy B ^c,d   Lehman, Constance ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING AND REPORTING DATA SYSTEMS; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 84862651230     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12110619     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American College of Radiology (ACR). Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1993.
2. American College of Radiology. ACR BIRADS: Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003;1-109.
3. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(1):35-40. (Pubitemid 28308645)
4. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(4):1260-1265. (Pubitemid 43821910)
5. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(13):1295-1303. (Pubitemid 46513295)
6. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187(2):493-501. (Pubitemid 23127861)
7. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190(2):485-493. (Pubitemid 24044258)
8. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004;292(22):2735-2742. (Pubitemid 39628252)
9. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171(1):95-103. (Pubitemid 19093051)
10. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211(1):101-110. (Pubitemid 29161739)
11. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ-Y, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(1):171-178. (Pubitemid 34694831)
12. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238(1):42-53. (Pubitemid 43010579)
13. Wedegärtner U, Bick U, Wörtler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 2001;11(9):1645-1650. (Pubitemid 32821373)
14. Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(1):35-43. (Pubitemid 30415534)
15. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997;202(3):833-841. (Pubitemid 27093463)
16. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(4):994-1000.
17. Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ, et al. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BIRADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 2007;242(2):388-395. (Pubitemid 46146191)
18. Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Sayre JW. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(5):1378-1383.
19. Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADSMRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci 2006;5(1):7-15.
20. Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(6):1658-1663.
21. Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 2007;13(6):545-550. (Pubitemid 350045709)
22. Liberman L. Breast cancer screening with MRI: what are the data for patients at high risk? N Engl J Med 2004;351(5):497-500. (Pubitemid 38988600)