A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification

Psychological Review

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 257-272

  Schooler, Lael J ^c   Shiffrin, Richard M ^a   Raaijmakers, Jeroen G W ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; VISION;

BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035228889     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.257     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Lebiere, C., & Matessa, M. (1998). An integrated theory of list memory. Journal of Memory and Language 18 341-380.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (Eds.). (1998). Atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, J. R., & Matessa, M. (1992). Explorations of an incremental, Bayesian algorithm for categorization. Machine Learning, 9, 275-308.
5. Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396-408.
6. Bower, G. H. (1996). Reactivating a reactivation theory of implicit memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 27-72.
7. Bowers, J. S. (1999). Priming is not all bias: Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon (1997). Psychological Review, 106, 582-596.
8. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154.
9. Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 309-347.
10. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
11. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
12. Hintzman, D. L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 109-139.
13. Ijiri, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Skew distributions and the sizes of business firms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
15. Masson, M. E. J., & MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Contributions of processing fluency to repetition effects in masked word identification. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 9-21.
16. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1997). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 734-760.
17. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
18. McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse. Psychological Review, 39, 352-370.
19. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (in press). The counter model for word identification: Reply to Bowers (1999). Psychological Review.
20. Mensink, G. J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455.
21. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
22. Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 202-254). New York: Academic Press.
23. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183-203.
24. Neaderhiser, B. J., & Church, B. A. (1998, November). Can perceptual bias account for priming in forced choice tasks? Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Dallas, TX.
25. Nobel, P. A., Diller, D. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (in press-a). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
26. Nobel, P. A., Diller, D. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (in press-b). A model for accuracy and response time in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
27. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schooler, L. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1997, November). Effects of repeated study on word identification in a 2AFC task. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
28. Rabinowitz, F. M. (1995). A stochastic algorithm for global optimization with constraints. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 21, 194-213.
29. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). The list-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 163-178.
30. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343.
31. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785.
32. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Verwoerd, M. (1989). A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 378-387.
33. Reder, L. M., & Gordon, J. S. (1996). Subliminal perception: Nothing special, cognitively speaking. In J. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to the study of consciousness (pp. 125-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274-280.
35. Salasoo, A., Shiffrin, R. M., & Feustel, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 50-77.
36. Schooler, L. J., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). The role of process in the rational analysis of memory. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 219-250.
37. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM - retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
38. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1998). The effectiveness of retrieval from memory. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition (pp. 73-95). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39. Wagenmakers, E. M., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2000). Testing the counter model for perceptual identification: Effects of repetition priming and word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 662-667.
40. Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.