Criterion Setting and the Dynamics of Recognition Memory

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 114-119

  Cox, Gregory E ^a   Shiffrin, Richard M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodic memory; memory models; reaction time; recognition memory

Indexed keywords

ABSOLUTE VALUES; CHANGE-OVER TIME; DECISION CRITERIONS; EPISODIC MEMORY; MEMORY MODELING; MODEL RECOGNITION; POSITIVE CHANGES; RANDOM-DOT PATTERN; RECOGNITION MEMORY; RECOGNITION PROCESS;

EID: 84881113579     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Brockdorff, N., & Lamberts, K. (2000). A feature-sampling account of the time course of old-new recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 77–102.
2. Criss, A. H. (2006). The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 461–478.
3. Dennis, S., & Chapman, A. (2010). The inverse list length effect: A challenge for pure exemplar models of recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 416–424.
4. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 452–478.
5. Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 414–435.
6. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91(1), 1–67.
7. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgements of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528–551.
8. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1–18.
9. Malmberg, K. J. (2008). Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 335–384.
10. Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). The”one-shot” hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 322–336.
11. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105(4), 724–760.
12. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89(3), 609–626.
13. Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83(3), 190–214.
14. Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., & Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 267–287.
15. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM–retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 145–166.
16. Starns, J. J., White, C. N., & Ratcliff, R. (2010). A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 18–34.
17. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Steyvers, M., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin, R. M., van Rijn, H., & Zeelenberg, R. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 332–367.