Aortic valve replacement with smaller prostheses in elderly patients: Does patient prosthetic mismatch affect outcomes?

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 341-347

  Concistrè, Giovanni ^a   Dell'Aquila, Angelo ^a   Pansini, Stefano ^a   Corsini, Biagino ^a   Costigliolo, Tiziano ^a   Piccardo, Alessandro ^a   Gallo, Alina ^a   Passerone, Giancarlo ^a   Regesta, Tommaso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INDEXED EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PATIENT PROSTHESIS MISMATCH; PROSTHESIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS SIZE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 12; SURVIVAL TIME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84880776675     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: 15408191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.12136     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Raimthoola SH:, The problem of valve prothesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58: 20-24.
2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 211-218.
3. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, et al. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valve. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 11: 114-120.
4. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000; 102 (Suppl 3): 5-9.
5. Milano AD, De Carlo M, Mecozzi G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19 mm and 21 mm St Jude aortic prostheses. Comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 37-43.
6. Raimthoola SH:, Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 893-904.
7. Blais C, Dusmenil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983-988.
8. Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 149-159.
9. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 505-510.
10. Dania ME, Malouf JF, Girard SE, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long term survival in patients with small St Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006; 113: 420-426.
11. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006; 113: 570-576.
12. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, et al. Aortic valve replacement. Is valve size important ? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 963-974.
13. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement. Valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1822-1829.
14. Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Rodriguez LL:, Prosthesis-patient size. Measurement and clinical implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 313-316.
15. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WRE, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 783-796.
16. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG:, Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-1141.
17. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller S:, A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220-223.
18. Burwash IG, Thomas DD, Sadahiro M, et al. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994; 89: 827-835.
19. Ruel M, Al Feleh H, Kulik A, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 1036-1044.
20. Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Hettich I, et al. Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: Which is the best method ? Heart 2007; 93: 615-620.
21. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutes EM, et al. Echocardiografic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450-458.
22. Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Camici PG, et al. Functional changes in coronary microcirculation after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2003; 107: 3170-3175.
23. Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Dutka DP, et al. Factors influencing coronary microcirculatory function in patients with aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2002; 106: II-640.
24. Nemes A, Forster T, Csanady M:, Decreased aortic distensibility and coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with significant aortic valve stenosis with normal epicardial coronary arteries. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 567-573.
25. Fernandez J, Chen C, Laub GW, et al. Predictive value of prosthetic valve area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with the St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation 1996; 94: II-109-II-112.
26. Knez J, Rienmuller R, Maier R, et al. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: An approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch ? Eur J Cardithorac Surg 2001; 19: 797-805.
27. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: s265-s268.
28. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, et al. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 637-643.
29. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, et al. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 542-546.
30. Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG, et al. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 747-756.
31. Castro LJ, Arcidi JMJ, Audrey L, et al. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: A preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 31-36.
32. Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: Impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 481-489.
33. Vandevoort PM, Greenberg NL, Powell KA, et al. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. Circulation 1995; 92: 3464-3472.
34. Henneke KH, Pongretz G, Bachmann K:, Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4: 18-25.