Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement

Circulation

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 983-988

  Blais, Claudia ^b   Dumesnil, Jean G ^b   Baillot, Richard ^b   Simard, Serge ^b   Doyle, Daniel ^b   Pibarot, Philippe ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Hemodynamics; Mortality; Prosthesis; Valves

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS; BJOERK SHILEY VALVE PROSTHESIS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARPENTIER EDWARDS VALVE PROSTHESIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HANCOCK VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SALVAGE THERAPY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; ODDS RATIO; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUEBEC; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; STROKE VOLUME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 0042859863     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085167.67105.32     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:20-24.
2. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, et al. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:637-643.
3. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg, 1992;6:S34-S38.
4. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1131-1141.
5. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, et al. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11:114-120.
6. Milano AD, De CM, Mecozzi G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:37-43.
7. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity, and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7:211-218.
8. Fernandez J, Chen C, Laub GW, et al. Predictive value of prosthetic valve area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with the St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation, 1996;94:11109-11112.
9. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, et al. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:963-974.
10. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival following aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2000;102:1115-1119.
11. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1822-1829.
12. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S265-S268.
13. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, et al. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:379-387.
14. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, et al. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;46:257-259.
15. Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Coombs LP, et al. Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:885-892.
16. STS Adult Cardiac Database: Definition ofterms (2.41). Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Chicago, IL. Available at: http://www.sts.org/file/CoreDef241Book.pdf.2002. Accessed September 13, 2002.
17. Castro LJ, Arcidi JMJ, Fisher AL, et al. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:31-36.
18. David TE. Surgery of the aortic valve. Curr Prob Surg. 1999;36:421-504.
19. Jamieson WR, Edwards FH, Schwartz M, et al. Risk stratification for cardiac valve replacement: National Cardiac Surgery Database. Database Committee of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:943-951.
20. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Schaff HV, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation. 2000;101:1940-1946.
21. Alexander KP, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:731-738.
22. Mehta RH, Bruckman D, Das S, et al. Implications of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:919-928.
23. Thomson DJ, Jamieson WRE, Dumesnil JG, et al. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis satisfactory early clinical performance. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:S122-S125.
24. Bach DS, Goldbach M, Sakwa MP, et al. Hemodynamics and early performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:436-442.
25. Chambers J, Ely JL. Early postoperative echocardiographic hemodynamic performance of the On-X prosthetic heart valve: a multicenter study. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7:569-573.