Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 149-159

  Ruel, Marc ^a,b   Rubens, Fraser D ^a   Masters, Roy G ^a   Pipe, Andrew L ^a   Bédard, Pierre ^a   Hendry, Paul J ^a   Lam, B Khanh ^a   Burwash, Ian G ^a   Goldstein, William G ^a   Brais, Maurice P ^a   Keon, Wilbert J ^a   Mesana, Thierry G ^a   Gillinov, A Marc ^c   Azar, Hormoz ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; COMORBIDITY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL;

EID: 10744233320     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.043     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1486-588.
2. Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. New operative technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;78:402-12.
3. Urbanski PP. Complete aortic root replacement in patients with small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:725-8; discussion 728-9.
4. Dellgren G, Feindel CM, Bos J, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV: long-term clinical and hemodynamic results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:698-702.
5. Rajappan K, Melina G, Bellenger NG, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular function and mass after Medtronic Freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11:60-5; discussion 66.
6. Sintek CF, Fletcher AD, Khonsari S. Stentless porcine aortic root: valve of choice for the elderly patient with small aortic root? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:871-6; discussion 876.
7. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1608-12.
8. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, et al. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:963-74.
9. Rao V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2000;102:1115-9.
10. Edmunds LH Jr, Cohn LH, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:351-3.
11. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, et al. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ad Hoc Liason Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:932-5.
12. Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1198-203.
13. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1131-41.
14. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986;1:54-77.
15. Gatti G, Maffei G, Lusa AM, Pugliese P. Tricuspid valve repair with the Cosgrove-Edwards annuloplasty system: early clinical and echocardiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:764-7.
16. Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, McCarthy PM. Atrial fibrillation: current surgical options and their assessment. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2210-7.
17. Rosendaal FR. Bridging case-control studies and randomized trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2:109-10.
18. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58:20-4.
19. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6(suppl 1):S34-7; discussion S38.
20. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Acuna JM, Vega Fernandez M, et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:273-80.
21. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:379-87.
22. Burwash IG, Hay KM, Chan KL. Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:814-22.
23. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1822-9; discussion 1829.
24. Knez I, Rienmuller R, Maier R, et al. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19:797-805.
25. Fernandez J, Chen C, Laub GW, et al. Predictive value of prosthetic valve area index for early and late clinical results after valve replacement with the St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation. 1996;94:11109-12.
26. Knez I, Machler H, Rehak P, et al. Concomitant procedures in the small versus standard aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5(suppl 3):S294-301.
27. Yoganathan AP, Woo YR, Sung HW, et al. In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92:198-209.
28. Baumgartner H, Khan SS, DeRobertis M, et al. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study. Circulation. 1992;85:2275-83.
29. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S265-8.