Changes in RNA polymerase II progression influence somatic hypermutation of Ig-related genes by AID

Journal of Experimental Medicine

Volumn 210, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1481-1492

  Kodgire, Prashant ^a,b   Mukkawar, Priyanka ^a   Ratnam, Sarayu ^a   Martin, Terence E ^a   Storb, Ursula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INDORE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; HEMOGLOBIN BETA CHAIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; RNA POLYMERASE II; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SUPERCOILING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION;

ANIMALS; AVIAN PROTEINS; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL LINE; CHICKENS; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; GENE KNOCK-IN TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN LAMBDA-CHAINS; RNA POLYMERASE II; RNA, MESSENGER; SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION, IMMUNOGLOBULIN; TERMINATOR REGIONS, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84880650205     PISSN: 00221007     EISSN: 15409538     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20121523     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arakawa, H., H. Saribasak, and J.M. Buerstedde. 2004. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase initiates immunoglobulin gene conversion and hypermutation by a common intermediate. PLoS Biol. 2:E179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020179
2. Basu, U., F.L. Meng, C. Keim, V. Grinstein, E. Pefanis, J. Eccleston, T. Zhang, D. Myers, C.R. Wasserman, D.R. Wesemann, et al. 2011. The RNA exosome targets the AID cytidine deaminase to both strands of transcribed duplex DNA substrates. Cell. 144:353-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.001
3. Betz, A.G., C. Milstein, A. González-Fernández, R. Pannell, T. Larson, and M.S. Neuberger. 1994. Elements regulating somatic hypermutation of an immunoglobulin kappa gene: critical role for the intron enhancer/matrix attachment region. Cell. 77:239-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90316-6
4. Bransteitter, R., P. Pham, M.D. Scharff, and M.F. Goodman. 2003. Activationinduced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:4102-4107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0730835100
5. Bransteitter, R., P. Pham, P. Calabrese, and M.F. Goodman. 2004. Biochemical analysis of hypermutational targeting by wild type and mutant activation-induced cytidine deaminase. J. Biol. Chem. 279:51612-51621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M408135200
6. Canugovi, C., M. Samaranayake, and A.S. Bhagwat. 2009. Transcriptional pausing and stalling causes multiple clustered mutations by human activation-induced deaminase. FASEB J. 23:34-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-115352
7. Chaudhuri, J., M. Tian, C. Khuong, K. Chua, E. Pinaud, and F.W. Alt. 2003. Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature. 422:726-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01574
8. Chaudhuri, J., C. Khuong, and F.W. Alt. 2004. Replication protein A interacts with AID to promote deamination of somatic hypermutation targets. Nature. 430:992-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02821
9. Colgan, D.F., and J.L. Manley. 1997. Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation. Genes Dev. 11:2755-2766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.21.2755
10. Conley, M.E., A.K. Dobbs, D.M. Farmer, S. Kilic, K. Paris, S. Grigoriadou, E. Coustan-Smith, V. Howard, and D. Campana. 2009. Primary B cell immunodeficiencies: comparisons and contrasts. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27:199-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132649
11. Davenport, R.J., G.J. Wuite, R. Landick, and C. Bustamante. 2000. Singlemolecule study of transcriptional pausing and arrest by E. coli RNA polymerase. Science. 287:2497-2500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5462.2497
12. Di Noia, J.M., G.T. Williams, D.T. Chan, J.M. Buerstedde, G.S. Baldwin, and M.S. Neuberger. 2007. Dependence of antibody gene diversification on uracil excision. J. Exp. Med. 204:3209-3219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20071768
13. Dickerson, S.K., E. Market, E. Besmer, and F.N. Papavasiliou. 2003. AID mediates hypermutation by deaminating single stranded DNA. J. Exp. Med. 197:1291-1296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20030481
14. Dye, M.J., and N.J. Proudfoot. 2001. Multiple transcript cleavage precedes polymerase release in termination by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 105:669-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00372-5
15. Galburt, E.A., S.W. Grill, A. Wiedmann, L. Lubkowska, J. Choy, E. Nogales, M. Kashlev, and C. Bustamante. 2007. Backtracking determines the force sensitivity of RNAP II in a factor-dependent manner. Nature. 446:820-823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05701
16. Hochedlinger, K., and K. Plath. 2009. Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development. 136:509-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.020867
17. Klotz, E.L., and U. Storb. 1996. Somatic hypermutation of a lambda 2 transgene under the control of the lambda enhancer or the heavy chain intron enhancer. J. Immunol. 157:4458-4463.
18. Kuehner, J.N., E.L. Pearson, and C. Moore. 2011. Unravelling the means to an end: RNA polymerase II transcription termination. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:283-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3098
19. Liu, L.F., and J.C. Wang. 1987. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:7024-7027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.20.7024
20. Liu, M., J.L. Duke, D.J. Richter, C.G. Vinuesa, C.C. Goodnow, S.H. Kleinstein, and D.G. Schatz. 2008. Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation. Nature. 451:841-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06547
21. ' end and the constant region of Ig genes are spared from somatic mutation because AID does not access these regions. J. Exp. Med. 202:1443-1454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20051604
22. Longerich, S., U. Basu, F. Alt, and U. Storb. 2006. AID in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 18:164-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2006.01.008
23. Nag, A., K. Narsinh, and H.G. Martinson. 2007. The poly(A)-dependent transcriptional pause is mediated by CPSF acting on the body of the polymerase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:662-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1253
24. Nambu, Y., M. Sugai, H. Gonda, C.G. Lee, T. Katakai, Y. Agata, Y. Yokota, and A. Shimizu. 2003. Transcription-coupled events associating with immunoglobulin switch region chromatin. Science. 302:2137-2140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092481
25. Parsa, J.Y., S. Ramachandran, A. Zaheen, R.M. Nepal, A. Kapelnikov, A. Belcheva, M. Berru, D. Ronai, and A. Martin. 2012. Negative supercoiling creates single-stranded patches of DNA that are substrates for AID-mediated mutagenesis. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002518
26. Pasqualucci, L., P. Neumeister, T. Goossens, G. Nanjangud, R.S. Chaganti, R. Küppers, and R. Dalla-Favera. 2001. Hypermutation of multiple protooncogenes in B-cell diffuse large-cell lymphomas. Nature. 412:341-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35085588
27. Pavri, R., A. Gazumyan, M. Jankovic, M. Di Virgilio, I. Klein, C. Ansarah-Sobrinho, W. Resch, A. Yamane, B. Reina San-Martin, V. Barreto, et al. 2010. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase targets DNA at sites of RNA polymerase II stalling by interaction with Spt5. Cell. 143:122-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.017
28. Peled, J.U., F.L. Kuang, M.D. Iglesias-Ussel, S. Roa, S.L. Kalis, M.F. Goodman, and M.D. Scharff. 2008. The biochemistry of somatic hypermutation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26:481-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090236
29. Peters, A., and U. Storb. 1996. Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes is linked to transcription initiation. Immunity. 4:57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80298-8
30. Pfaffl, M.W. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
31. Pham, P., R. Bransteitter, J. Petruska, and M.F. Goodman. 2003. Processive AID-catalysed cytosine deamination on single-stranded DNA simulates somatic hypermutation. Nature. 424:103-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01760
32. Popp, C., W. Dean, S. Feng, S.J. Cokus, S. Andrews, M. Pellegrini, S.E. Jacobsen, and W. Reik. 2010. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature. 463:1101-1105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08829
33. Rada, C., G.T. Williams, H. Nilsen, D.E. Barnes, T. Lindahl, and M.S. Neuberger. 2002. Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice. Curr. Biol. 12:1748-1755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01215-0
34. Rada, C., J.M. Di Noia, and M.S. Neuberger. 2004. Mismatch recognition and uracil excision provide complementary paths to both Ig switching and the A/T-focused phase of somatic mutation. Mol. Cell. 16:163-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.011
35. Rai, K., I.J. Huggins, S.R. James, A.R. Karpf, D.A. Jones, and B.R. Cairns. 2008. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell. 135:1201-1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.042
36. Ramiro, A.R., P. Stavropoulos, M. Jankovic, and M.C. Nussenzweig. 2003. Transcription enhances AID-mediated cytidine deamination by exposing single-stranded DNA on the nontemplate strand. Nat. Immunol. 4:452-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni920
37. Shen, H.M., and U. Storb. 2004. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) can target both DNA strands when the DNA is supercoiled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:12997-13002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404974101
38. Shen, H.M., A. Peters, B. Baron, X. Zhu, and U. Storb. 1998. Mutation of BCL-6 gene in normal B cells by the process of somatic hypermutation of Ig genes. Science. 280:1750-1752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5370.1750
39. Shen, H.M., S. Ratnam, and U. Storb. 2005. Targeting of the activationinduced cytosine deaminase is strongly influenced by the sequence and structure of the targeted DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:10815-10821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.24.10815-10821.2005
40. Shen, H.M., A. Tanaka, G. Bozek, D. Nicolae, and U. Storb. 2006. Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in Msh6(-/-)Ung(-/-) double-knockout mice. J. Immunol. 177:5386-5392.
41. Stavnezer, J., J.E. Guikema, and C.E. Schrader. 2008. Mechanism and regulation of class switch recombination. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26:261-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090248
42. Storb, U., H.M. Shen, S. Longerich, S. Ratnam, A. Tanaka, G. Bozek, and S. Pylawka. 2007. Targeting of AID to immunoglobulin genes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 596:83-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-46530-8_8
43. Storb, U., H.M. Shen, and D. Nicolae. 2009. Somatic hypermutation: processivity of the cytosine deaminase AID and error-free repair of the resulting uracils. Cell Cycle. 8:3097-3101. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.19.9658
44. Storck, S., S. Aoufouchi, J.C. Weill, and C.A. Reynaud. 2011. AID and partners: for better and (not) for worse. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23:337-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2011.02.002
45. Tanaka, A., H.M. Shen, S. Ratnam, P. Kodgire, and U. Storb. 2010. Attracting AID to targets of somatic hypermutation. J. Exp. Med. 207:405-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20090821
46. Wei, M., R. Shinkura, Y. Doi, M. Maruya, S. Fagarasan, and T. Honjo. 2011. Mice carrying a knock-in mutation of Aicda resulting in a defect in somatic hypermutation have impaired gut homeostasis and compromised mucosal defense. Nat. Immunol. 12:264-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1991