'Make it explicit!': Improving collaboration through increase of script coercion

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 383-398

  Papadopoulos, P M ^a   Demetriadis, S N ^a   Weinberger, A ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coercion; Computer supported collaborative learning; Scripted collaboration; Scripts

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879744148     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12014     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
2. Beers, P. J., Kirschner, P. A., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). ICT-support for grounding in the classroom. Instructional Science, 35, 535-556. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9018-5
3. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A powerful and practical approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289-300.
4. Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.
5. Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, & W. Levelt (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 241-256). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
6. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
7. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
8. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Overscripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
9. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (2004). Framework for integrated learning. Deliverable D23-05-01-F of Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Retrieved September, 11, 2008 from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/01/07/PDF/Dillenbourg-Kaleidoscope-2004.pdf
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York, NY: Springer.
11. Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 1-13.
12. Ewusi-Mensah, K. (2003). Software development failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. (Eds.). (2007). Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.
14. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48, 56-66.
15. Hernandez-Leo, D. (2007). A pattern-based design process for the creation of CSCL macro-scripts computationally represented with IMS LD. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Valladolid, Spain. Retrieved on July 7 from: http://www.dtic.upf.edu/~daviniah/PhDThesis-DaviniaHL.pdf
16. Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 567-589.
17. Hron, A., Hesse, F. W., Cress, U., & Giovis, C. (2000). Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 53-64.
18. Jang, S. J. (2007). A study of students' construction of science knowledge: Talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educational Research, 49, 65-81. doi:10.1080/00131880701200781
19. Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., & Woodall, P. (2005). An investigation of software engineering curricula. Journal of Systems and Software, 74, 325-335.
20. Klein, P. D., Piacente-Cimini, S., & Williams, L. A. (2007). The role of writing in learning from analogies. Learning and Instruction, 17, 595-611. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.006
21. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 211-224.
22. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159-185.
23. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708-721. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021
24. Liu, C., & Tsai, C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50, 627-639.
25. Lou, Y. P., Abrami, P. C., & Spence, J. C. (2000). Effects of within-class grouping on student achievement: An exploratory model. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 101-112.
26. Menary, R. (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29, 621-632.
27. Miyake, N. (1982). Constructive interaction [microform] / Naomi Miyake. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
28. Nückles, M., Hubner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259-271. doi:10.1016/j.1earninstruc.2008.05.002
29. Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S. N., & Stamelos, I. G. (2009). Analyzing the role of students' self-organization in scripted collaboration: A case study. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Rhodes, Greece (pp. 487-496).
30. Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S. N., Stamelos, I. G., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2009). Prompting students' context-generating cognitive activity in ill-structured domains: Does the prompting mode affect learning? Educational Technology Research & Development, 57, 193-210.
31. Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S. N., Stamelos, I. G., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2010). The value of writing-to-learn when using question prompts to support web-based learning in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology Research & Development, 59, 71-90.
32. Pfister, H. R., & Oehl, M. (2009). The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net-based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 161-176. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00287.x
33. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273-304.
34. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2007). Can people learn computer-mediated collaboration by following a script? In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 39-55). New York, NY: Springer.
35. Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
36. Sommerville, I. (2004). Software engineering (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley.
37. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3&4), 304-313.
38. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40, 297-323. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
39. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 421-447.
40. Tchounikine, P. (2011). Computer science and educational software design - A resource for multidisciplinary work in technology enhanced learning. Berlin: Springer.
41. Teasley, S., Fischer, F., Dillenbourg, P., Kapur, M., Chi, M., Weinberger, A., & Stegmann, K. (2008). Cognitive convergence in collaborative learning. Paper presented at the International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2008.
42. Verville, J., & Halingten, A. (2001). Acquiring enterprise software: Beating the vendors at their own game. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). From guided to self-regulated performance of domain-general skills: The role of peer monitoring during the fading of instructional scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21, 746-756.
45. Weinberger, A. (2011). Principles of transactive computer-supported collaboration scripts. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6, 189-202.
46. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 416-426. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
47. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506-515.
48. Yardley, D. (2002). Successful IT project delivery: Learning the lessons of project failure. London, UK: Pearson Education.