Understanding the writing habits of tomorrow's students: Technology and college readiness

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 477-505

  Relles, Stefani R ^a   Tierney, William G ^a  

^a USC Rossier School of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879342922     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2013.0025     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, dc: U.S. department of Education.
2. Attewell, p., Domina, t., Lavin, d. E., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886-924.
3. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NcES 2011-033). Washington, dc: U.S. department of Education.
4. Bahr, P. R. (2010). Revisiting the efficacy of postsecondary remediation: The moderating effects of depth/breadth of deficiency. The Review of Higher Education, 33(2), 177-205.
5. Bargh, J. A., Mckenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? activation and expression of the "true self" on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33-48.
6. Bellard, E. M. (2005). Information literacy needs of nontraditional graduate students in social work. Research Strategies, 20(4), 494-505.
7. Bennett, S., Maton, k., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
8. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
9. Brown, G., & yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, Uk: cambridge University press.
10. Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy. What do young people need to know about digital media. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4(1), 263-276.
11. Buckingham, D. (2008). Introducing identity. In d. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, Ma: The m.i.t. Press.
12. Bureau of labor Statistics. (2010). College enrollment and work activity of 2009 high school graduates. Washington, dc: U.S. department of labor.
13. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? why you can't read the way you used to. Atlantic Monthly, 302(1), 56-63.
14. Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 479-488.
15. Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., kalantzis, M., Kress, G., Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
16. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: lawrence Earlbaum associates, inc.
17. dimaggio, p., hargittai, E., Neuman, w. R., & Robinson, J. p. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 307-336.
18. Döring, N. (2002). Personal home pages on the web: A review of research. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7(3). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00152.x/full
19. Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning and the generations: knowledge is power-no more. In J. Bourne & J. c. moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 85-100). Needham, ma: Sloan center for online Education.
20. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93.
21. Fairlie, R. W., Beltran, D. O., & Das, K. K. (2010). Home computers and educational outcomes: Evidence from the NlSy97 and cpS. Economic Inquiry, 48(3), 771-792.
22. Fernández-Luna, J. M., Huete, J. F., Macfarlane, A., & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2009). Teaching and learning in information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 12(2), 201-2226.
23. Gee, J. (2000). Teenagers in new times: a new literacy studies perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 412-420.
24. Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New york, Ny: taylor & francis.
25. Goode, J. (2010). Mind the gap: the digital dimension of college access. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(5), 583-618.
26. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
27. Gutiérrez, K., Morales, P. Z., & Martinez, D. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 212-245.
28. Hall, W., de Roure, D., & Shadbolt, N. (2009). The evolution of the web and implications for eresearch. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367(1890), 991.
29. Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? variation in internet skills and uses among members of the "net generation." Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113.
30. Hocks, M. E. (2003). Understanding visual rhetoric in digital writing environments. College Composition and Communication, 54(4), 629-656.
31. ITo, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Pascoe, C. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, ma: the m.i.t. press.
32. Jenkins, H., purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. cambridge, ma: the m.i.t. press.
33. Jones, S., Johnson-Yale, C., Millermaier, S., & Pérez, F. S. (2009). U.S. college students' internet use: Race, gender and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 244-264.
34. Kaminski, K., Switzer, J., & Gloeckner, G. (2009). Workforce readiness: a study of university students' fuency with information technology. Computers & Education, 53(2), 228-233.
35. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New york, Ny: Routledge.
36. Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3-14.
37. Lowenthal, P. R., & White, J. W. (2010). minority college students and tacit "codes of power": developing academic discourses and identities. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 283-318.
38. Luckin, R., Clark, w., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profles of 11-16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87-104.
39. Mcilroy, D., Sadler, C., & Boojawon, N. (2007). Computer phobia and computer self-efficacy: Their association with undergraduates' use of university computer facilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1285-1299.
40. Mckenna, K. Y. A., Green, a. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: what's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31.
41. Mcluhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. Berkeley, ca: Gingko press.
42. Messaris, P. (1998). Visual aspects of media literacy. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 70-80.
43. Mills, K. A. (2010). a review of the "digital turn" in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246.
44. Morgan, D. (1998). Ethical issues raised by students' personal writing. College English, 60(3), 318-325.
45. Nasah, A., Dacosta, B., Kinsell, C., & Seok, S. (2010). The digital literacy debate: an investigation of digital propensity and information and communication technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 531-555.
46. Nelson, M., Hull, G. A., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25(4), 415.
47. O'Brien, D. G. (1998). Multiple literacies in a high-school program for "at-risk" adolescents. In D. alvermann (Ed.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 27-49). Mahwah, NJ: lawrence Earlbaum associates, inc.
48. Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2008). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. in c. a. macarthur, S. Graham, & J. fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158-170). New york, Ny: Guilford press.
49. Riffaterre, M. (1994). Intertextuality vs. hypertextuality. New Literary History, 25(4), 779-788.
50. Robison, A. (2008). The design is the game: writing games, Teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 25(3), 359-370.
51. Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94.
52. Slattery, P. J. (2010). The argumentative, multiple-source paper: college students reading, thinking and writing about divergent points of view. Journal of Teaching Writing, 10(2), 181-200.
53. Spiro, R. J., Feltovitch, P. L., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive fexibil-ity, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24-33.
54. Stern, S. (2008). Producing sites, exploring identities: youth online authorship. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 95-117). Cambridge, ma: the m.i.t. press.
55. Strano, M. M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook Profle Images. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), 5.
56. Strayhorn, T. L. (2011). Bridging the pipeline: increasing underrepresented students' preparation for college through a summer bridge program. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(2), 142-159.
57. Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: what are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1-24.
58. Trappes-Lomax, H. (2004). Discourse analysis. In a. davies & c. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 133-164). Malden, ma: Blackwell publishing.
59. Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: the tethered self. in J. katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 121-137). Cambridge, ma: the m.i.t. press.
60. Upton, T. A., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: the move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585-605.
61. VAN DEURSEN, A. J., VAN DIJK, J. A., & PETERS, O. (2011). Rethinking internet skills: the contribution of gender, age, education, internet experience, and hours online to medi-um-and content-related internet skills. Poetics, 39(2), 125-144.
62. Vie, S. (2008). Digital divide 2.0. Computers and Composition, 25(1), 9-23.
63. Walker, K. (2000). "It's diffcult to hide it": The presentation of self on Internet home pages. Qualitative Sociology, 23(1), 99-120.
64. Walpole, M. B. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: how SES affects college experiences and outcomes. Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 45-74.
65. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179.