Mind the gap: The digital dimension of college access

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 583-618

  Goode, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957838752     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2010.0005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3-41.
2. nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
3. Becker, H. J. (2000a). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).
4. Becker, H. J. (2000b). Subject and teacher objectives for computer-using classes by school socio-economic status. Irvine, CA: CRITO.
5. Becker, H. J. (2000c). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44-75.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
7. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.
8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9. California Department of Education. (2003). CBEDS Course Codes and Definitions. Retrieved August 13, 2003, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/demographics/ coord/curriculum/computer-science.htm
10. California Technology Assistance Project. (2002). Summary of statewide results from the 2002 California school technology survey. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
11. Cattagni, A., & Westat, E. F. (2001). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
12. Ching, C. C., Basham, J. D., Jang, E., Parisi, J., & Vidgor, L. (2004). Memories, meanings, & microchips: Technology in pre-service teachers' everday lives and narrative autobiographies. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Atlanta, GA.
13. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
14. Cooper, J., & Weaver, K. D. (2003). Gender and computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Access to quality teaching: An analysis of inequality in California's public schools. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from http://www.decentschools.org
17. Dillman, D. A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
18. Doherty, K. M., & Orlofsky, G. F. (2001). Student survey says. Education Weekly, XX(35), 45-48.
19. Fowler, F. J. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Fox, S. (2007). Latinos online [Electronic Version]. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Latinos-Online-March-14-2007.pdf
21. Gee, J. P. (2000-2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Transaction.
23. Goode, J. (2007). If you build teachers, will students come? Professional development for broadening computer science learning for urban youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1), 65-88.
24. Goode, J., Estrella, R., & Margolis, J. (2006). Lost in translation: Gender and high school computer science. In W. Aspry & J. M. Cohoon (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 89-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
26. Harris, L. (2002). A survey of the status of equality in public education in California. Retrieved November 1, 2002, from http://www.publicadvocates.org
27. Horrigan, J. B. (2006). Home broadband adoption 2006. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Broadband-trends2006.pdf
28. Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates of the California Community Colleges and the California State University and the University of California. (2002). Academic literacy: A statement of competencies expected of students entering California's public colleges and universities. Sacramento, CA.
29. Jones, S. (2002). The Internet goes to college. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life.
30. Kirkpatrick, H., & Cuban, L. (1998). Should we be worried? What the research says about gender differences in access, use, attitudes, and achievement with computers. Educational Technology, 38(4), 56-61.
31. Koski, W. S. (2002). What educational resources do students need to meet California's educational content standards? An analysis of California's educational content standards and their implications for basic educational conditions and resources. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from http://www. decentschools.org
32. Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 537.
33. Leslie, L. L. (1972). Are high response rates essential to valid surveys? Social Science Research, 1(3), 323-334.
34. MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't no makin' it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35. Margolis, J., Holme, J. J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Nao, K., & Stumme, S. (2003). The computer science pipeline in urban schools: Access to what? For whom? IEEE Technology and Society, 22(3), 12-19.
36. Martin, D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociocultural context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38. Muhr, T. (2004). User's manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0, ATLAS.ti scientific software development. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.
39. Sax, L., Ceja, M., & Teranishi, R. T. (2001). Technological preparedness among entering freshmen: The role of race, class, and gender. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(4), 363-382.
40. Sax, L., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432.
41. Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. SPSS for Windows (2005). SPSS 14.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
43. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45. UCLA Library Instructional Services Advisory Committee. (2001). UCLA library information competence at UCLA: Report of a survey project. Los Angeles: UCLA.
46. Valadez, J. R., & Duran, R. (2007). Redefining the digital divide: Beyond access to computers and the internet. High School Journal, 90(3), 31-44.
47. Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(4). Retrieved March 10, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n4.html
48. Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562-588.
49. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
51. Willis, P. E. (1981). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Colombia University Press.