Note on the applicability of the f-model in analysis of pollen pool heterogeneity

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 578-585

  Chybicki, Igor J ^a  

^a KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

AMOVA; Bayesian estimation; F model; pollen pool heterogeneity; TwoGener

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALLELE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; NONHUMAN; OUTCROSSING; PARENT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY;

AMOVA; BAYESIAN ESTIMATION; F-MODEL; POLLEN POOL HETEROGENEITY; TWOGENER;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE POOL; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; POLLEN; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84879174815     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/est029     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE, Sork VL. 2004. Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol. 13:937-954
2. Austerlitz F, Dutech C, Smouse PE, Davis F, Sork VL. 2007. Estimating anisotropic pollen dispersal: A case study in Quercus lobata. Heredity. 99:193-204
3. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE. 2001. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between Φ(ft), pollen dispersal and interfemale distance. Genetics. 157:851-857
4. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE. 2002. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics. 161:355-363
5. Balding DJ. 2003. Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theor Popul Biol. 63:221-230
6. Balding DJ, Nichols RA. 1995. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica. 96:3-12
7. Beaumont MA. 2005. Adaptation and speciation: What can Fst tell us? Trends Ecol Evol. 20:435-440
8. Beaumont MA, Balding DJ. 2004. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol. 13:969-980
9. Beaumont MA, Rannala B. 2004. The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 5:251-261
10. Burczyk J, Koralewski TE. 2005. Parentage versus two-generation analyses for estimating pollen-mediated gene flow in plant populations. Mol Ecol. 14:2525-2537
11. Chen MH, Shao QM, 1999. Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat. 8:69-92
12. Craft KJ, Ashley MV. 2010. Pollen-mediated gene flow in isolated and continuous stands of bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae). Am J Bot. 97:1999-2006
13. de-Lucas AI, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Hidalgo E, González- Martínez SC. 2008. Mating system and pollen gene flow in Mediterranean maritime pine. Heredity. 100:390-399
14. Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL, Smouse PE. 2004. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape V: A stepwise approach for extracting factors contributing to pollen structure. Heredity. 92:204-211
15. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 131:479-491
16. Fernández-Manjarrés JF, Sork VL. 2005. Mating patterns of a subdivided population of the andean oak (Quercus humboldtii Bonpl., Fagaceae). J Hered. 96:635-643
17. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. 2006. Identifying the environmental factors that determine the genetic structure of populations. Genetics. 174:875-891
18. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. 2008. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: A Bayesian perspective. Genetics. 180:977-993
19. Gaggiotti OE, Foll M. 2010. Quantifying population structure using the F-model. Mol Ecol Resour. 10:821-830
20. Gérard PR, Klein EK, Austerlitz F, Fernández- Manjarrés JF, Frascaria-Lacoste N. 2006. Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population. BMC Evol Biol. 6:96
21. Gonzales E, Hamrick JL, Smouse PE, Dyer RJ. 2006. Pollen-mediated gene dispersal within continuous and fragmented populations of a forest understorey species, Trillium cuneatum. Mol Ecol. 15:2047-2058
22. Hardy OJ, González-Martínez SC, Colas B, Fréville H, Mignot A, Olivieri I. 2004. Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics. 168:1601-1614
23. Hoff PD, 2009. A first course in Bayesian statistical methods. New York: Springer
24. Holsinger KE, 1999. Analysis of genetic diversity in geographically structured populations: A Bayesian perspective. Hereditas. 130:245-255
25. Holsinger KE, Weir BS. 2009. Genetics in geographically structured populations: Defining, estimating and interpreting Fst. Nat Rev Genet. 10:639-650
26. Hufford MB, Gepts P, Ross-Ibarra J. 2011. Influence of cryptic population structure on observed mating patterns in the wild progenitor of maize (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis). Mol Ecol. 20:46-55
27. Irwin AJ, Hamrick JL, Godt MJ, Smouse PE. 2003. A multiyear estimate of the effective pollen donor pool for Albizia julibrissin. Heredity. 90:187-194
28. Kitada S, Hayashi T, Kishino H. 2000. Empirical Bayes procedure for estimating genetic distance between populations and effective population size. Genetics. 156:2063-2079
29. Lesaffre E, Lawson AB. 2012. Bayesian biostatistics. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
30. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Kawahara T, Manabe T, Yamamoto S. 2004. Patterns of pollen flow and genetic differentiation among pollen pools in Quercus salicina in a warm temperate old-growth evergreen broadleaved forest. Silvae Genet. 53:258-264
31. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Manabe T, Yamamoto S. 2005. Interannual genetic heterogeneity of pollen pools accepted by Quercus salicina individuals. Mol Ecol. 14:4469-4478
32. Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve HK. 2003. Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol. 12:3157-3164
33. Ritland K. 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity. 88:221-228
34. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Austerlitz F, Smouse PE. 2006. A new method of estimating the pollen dispersal curve independently of effective density. Genetics. 173:1033-1045
35. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Austerlitz F, Smouse PE. 2007. POLDISP: A software package for indirect estimation of contemporary pollen dispersal. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:763-766
36. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Smouse PE, Gil L, Alía R. 2004. Pollen movement under alternative silvicultural practices in native populations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in central Spain. For Ecol Manage. 197:245-255
37. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL. 2001. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution. 55:260-271
38. Smouse PE, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ. 2005. Measuring the genetic structure of the pollen pool as the probability of paternal identity. Heredity. 94:640-649
39. Sork VL, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD. 2005. A two-generation analysis of pollen pool genetic structure in flowering dogwood, Cornus florida (Cornaceae), in the Missouri Ozarks. Am J Bot. 92:262-271
40. Wright S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations. Ann Eugen. 15: 323-354 IUVENTUS Plus programme)