Mating patterns of a subdivided population of the Andean oak (Quercus humboldtii Bonpl., Fagaceae)

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 635-643

  Fernandez M J F ^a   Sork, V L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOMBIA; COMPARATIVE GENE MAPPING; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; FAGACEAE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE; MATING SYSTEM; OAK; PLANT REPRODUCTION; PLANT SEED; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; SAMPLE; SOUTH AMERICA; SPECIES COMPARISON; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

FAGACEAE; QUERCUS;

EID: 27944480915     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi104     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Apsit VJ, Hamrick JL, and Nason JD, 2001. Breeding population size of a fragmented population of a Costa Rican dry forest tree species. J Hered 92:415-420.
2. ft, pollen dispersal and interfemale distance. Genetics 157:851-857.
3. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, and Kremer A, 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution 50:900-908.
4. Barrett SC, Husband BC, and Cole WW, 1993. Variation in outcrossing rates in Eichhornia paniculata: temporal changes in populations of contrasting style morph structure. Plant Species Biol 8:141-148.
5. Collevatti RG, Grattapaglia D, and Hay JD, 2001. High resolution microsatellite based analysis of the mating system allows the detection of significant biparental inbreeding in Caryocar brasiliense, an endangered tropical tree species. Heredity 86:60-67.
6. DeWoody JA, DeWoody YD, Fiumera AC, and Avise JC, 2000a. On the number of reproductives contributing to a half-sib progeny array. Genet Res 75:95-105.
7. DeWoody JA, Walker D, and Avise JC, 2000b. Genetic parentage in large half-sib clutches: theoretical estimates and empirical appraisals. Genetics 154:1909-1912.
8. Doligez A and Joly HI, 1997. Mating system of Carapa procera (Meliaceae) in the French Guiana tropical forest. Am J Bot 84:461-470.
9. Dutech C, Sork VL, Irwin AJ, Smouse PE, and Davis FW, 2005. Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind-pollinated tree species, Quercus lobata (Fagaceaee). Am J Bot 92:252-261.
10. El-Kassaby YA and Jaquish B, 1996. Population density and mating pattern in western larch. J Hered 87:438-443.
11. Fernández JF, 2002, Genetic structure of the Andean oak Quercus humboldtii Bonpl. (Fagaceae) in fragmented populations (PhD dissertation). St. Louis: University of Missouri.
12. Fernández JF, Sork VL, Gallego G, Lopez J, Bohorques A, and Tohme J, 2000. Cross-amplification of microsatellite loci in a neotropical Quercus species and standardization of DNA extraction from mature leaves dried in silica gel. Plant Mol Biol Rep 18:397.
13. Fiumera AC, DeWoody YD, DeWoody JA, Asmussen MA, and Avise JC, 2001. Accuracy and precision of methods to estimate the number of parents contributing to a half-sib progeny array. J Hered 92:120-126.
14. González-Astorga J, Cruz-Angon A, Flores-Palacios A, and Vovides AP, 2004. Diversity and genetic structure of the Mexican endemic epiphyte Tillandsia achyrostachys E. Morr. ex Baker var. achyrostachys (Bromeliaceae). Ann Bot 94:541-551.
15. Hall P, Orrell LC, and Bawa KS, 1994. Genetic diversity and mating system in a tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Am J Bot 81:1104-1111.
16. Hoebee SE and Young AG, 2001. Low neighbourhood size and high interpopulation differentiation in the endangered shrub Grevillea iaspicula McGill (Proteaceae). Heredity 86:489-496.
17. Hooghiemstra H and Sarmiento G, 1991. Long continental pollen record from a tropical intermontane basin: late Pliocene and Pleistocene history from a 540-meter core. Episodes 14:107-115.
18. Kitamura K, Rahman MB, Ochiai Y, and Yoshimaru H, 1994. Estimation of the outcrossing rate on Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. f. in primary and secondary forests in Brunei, Borneo, Southeast Asia. Plant Species Biol 9:37-41.
19. Ledig F, Capo-Arteaga TM, Hodgskiss PD, Sbay H, Flores-Lopez C, Conkle MT, and Bermejo-Velazquez B, 2001. Genetic diversity and the mating system of a rare Mexican piñon, Pinus pinceana, and a comparison with Pinus maximartinezii (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 88:1977-1987.
20. Nason JD and Hamrick JL, 1997. Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of neotropical canopy trees. J Hered 88:264-276.
21. Nixon KC, 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann Sci For 50(suppl 1):S25-S34.
22. Raijmann LN, Van-Leeuwen C, Kersten R, Oostermeijer GB, and Den-Nijs HCM, 1994. Genetic variation and outcrossing rate in relation to population size in Gentiana pneumontane L. Conserv Biol 8:1014-1026.
23. Rajora OP, Mosseler A, and Major JE, 2002, Mating system and reproductive fitness traits of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in large, central versus small, isolated, marginal populations. Can J Bot 80:1173-1184.
24. Raven PH and Axelrod DI, 1974. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 61:539-673.
25. Ritland K, 1989. Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43:848-859.
26. Ritland K, 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88:221-228.
27. Schwarzmann JF and Gerhold HD, 1991. Genetic structure and mating system of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Pennsylvania. For Sci 37:1376-1389.
28. Smouse, PE, Dyer JF, Westfall R, and Sork VL, 2001. Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55:260-271.
29. Smouse PE and Sork VL, 2004. Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. For Manage Ecol 197:21-38.
30. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ, 1995. Biometry. New York: WH Freeman.
31. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernández-M JF, and Kuhn B, 2002a. Pollen movement in declining populations of California valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11:1657-1669.
32. Sork VL, Dyer RJ, Davis FW, and Smouse PE, 2002b. Mating system in California valley oak, Quercus lobata Neé. In: Proceedings of the fifth symposium on oak woodlands: oaks in California's changing landscape, October 22-25, 2001, San Diego, CA (Standiford R and McCreary D, eds). General Technical Report PSW-GTR-184. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 427-440.
33. n microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol Biol 33:1093-1096.
34. White GM, Boshier DH, and Powell W, 2002. Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2038-2042.
35. Wright S, 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Volume 2: The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Young AG, Boyle T, and Brown T, 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413-418.
37. Young AG, Merriam HG, and Warwick SI, 1993. The effects of forest fragmentation on genetic variation in Acer saccharum Marsh. (sugar maple) populations. Heredity 71:277-289.