Mating system and pollen gene flow in Mediterranean maritime pine

Heredity

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 390-399

  De Lucas, A I ^a,d   Robledo Arnuncio, J J ^b   Hidalgo, E ^a,d   Gonzalez Martinez S C ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^c Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

^d INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Correlated paternity; KinDist; Mediterranean forest; Outcrossing rates; Pinus pinaster; Pollen dispersal

Indexed keywords

ANEMOPHILY; BIOMETRY; CONIFEROUS TREE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GENE FLOW; GENE TRANSFER; GENETIC VARIATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OUTCROSSING; PATERNITY; PHENOLOGY; POLLEN;

ARTICLE; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SPAIN; TREE;

GENE FLOW; PINUS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SPAIN; TREES;

PINUS PINASTER;

EID: 41149167114     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801090     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adams WT, Burczyk J (2000). Magnitude and Implications of Gene Flow in Gene Conservation Reserves. CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Australia. pp 215-224.
2. Alía R, Gil L, Pardos JA (1995). Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster provenances on 5 locations in Central Spain. Silvae Genet 44: 75-81.
3. Alía R, Moro J, Denis JB (1997). Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Can J Forest Research 27: 1548-1559.
4. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE et al. (2004). Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13: 937-954.
5. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2001). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between Fft, pollen dispersal and interfemale distance. Genetics 157: 851-857.
6. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2002). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics 161: 355-363.
7. Boshier DH (2000). Mating systems. In: Boyle T, Boshier D, Young A (eds). Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Australia, 350pp.
8. Bucci G, González-Martínez SC, Le Provost G, Plomion C, Ribeiro MM, Sebastiani F et al. (2007). Range-wide phylogeography and gene zones in Pinus pinaster Ait. revealed by chloroplast microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 16: 2137-2153.
9. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffins AR (2002). Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol Ecol 11: 2379-2391.
10. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY (1996). Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand. Heredity 77: 251-260.
11. Burczyk J, DiFazio SP, Adams WT (2004). Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel? Forest Genet 11: 1-14.
12. Burdon JJ, Jarosz AM, Brown AHD (1988). Temporal patterns of reproduction and outcrossing in weedy populations of Echium plantagineum. Biol J Linn Soc 34: 81-92.
13. Chagné D, Chaumeil P, Ramboer A, Collada C, Guevara A, Cervera MT et al. (2004). Cross-species transferability and mapping of genomic and cDNA SSRs in pines. Theor Appl Genet 109: 1204-1214.
14. Chambel R (2006). Variabilidad adaptativa y plasticidad fenotípica en procedencias de pinos 8 ibéricos. PhD dissertation, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid.
15. Degen B, Bandou E, Caron H (2004). Limited pollen dispersal and biparental inbreeding in Symbhonia globulifera in French Guiana. Heredity 93: 585-591.
16. Derory J, Mariette S, González-Martínez SC, Chagné D, Madur D, Gerber S et al. (2002). What can nuclear microsatellites tell us about maritime pine genetic resources conservation and provenance certification strategies? Ann Forest Sci 59: 699-708.
17. Di-Giovanni F, Kevan PG (1991). Factors affecting pollen dynamics and its importance to pollen contamination: a review. Can J Forest Research 21: 1155-1170.
18. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998). Factors influencing male mating success in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. New Forest 15: 161-180.
19. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
20. Dyer RJ (2002). Contemporary pollen movement in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. PhD dissertation, University of Missouri, St Louis, MO.
21. El-Kassaby YA, Dunsworth BG, Krakowski J (2003). Genetic evaluation of alternative silvicultural systems in coastal montane forests: western hemlock and amabilis fir. Theor Appl Genet 107: 598-610.
22. El-Kassaby YA, Jaquish B (1996). Population density and mating pattern in western larch. J Hered 87: 438-443.
23. Farris MA, Mitton JB (1984). Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygote superiority in ponderosa pine. Evolution 38: 1151-1154.
24. Franceschinelli EV, Bawa KS (2000). The effect of ecological factors on the mating system of a South American shrub species (Helicteres brevispira). Heredity 84: 116-123.
25. Furnier GR, Adams WT (1986). Mating system in natural populations of Jeffrey pine. Am J Bot 73: 1008-1022.
26. García C, Arroyo M, Godoy A, Jordano P (2005). Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Mol Ecol 14: 1821-1830.
27. Gérard PR, Klein EK, Austerlitz F, Fernández- Manjarrés JF, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2006). Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population. BMC Evol Biol 6: 96.
28. Glémin S, Bazin E, Charlesworth D (2006). Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants. Proc R Soc B 273: 3011-3019.
29. González-Martínez SC, Burczyk J, Nathan R, Nanos N, Gil L, Alía R (2006). Effective gene dispersal and female reproductive success in Mediterranean maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton). Mol Ecol 15: 4577-4588.
30. González-Martínez SC, Cervera MT, Martínez-Zapater JM, Gil L, Alía R (2002). Seed gene flow and fine-scale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 104: 1290-1297.
31. Griffin CAM, Eckert CG (2003). Experimental analysis of biparental inbreeding in a self-fertilizing plant. Evolution 57: 1513-1519.
32. Hardy OJ, González-Martínez SC, Colas B, Fréville H, Mignot A, Olivieri I (2004). Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168: 1601-1614.
33. Holsinger KE (2000). Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 7037-7042.
34. Klein EK, Lavigne C, Gouyon P-H (2006). Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential. BMC Ecol 6: 1-12.
35. Knowles P, Furnier GR, Aleksiuk MA, Perry DJ (1987). Significant levels of self-fertilization in natural populations of tamarack. Can J Bot 65: 1087-1091.
36. Lindgren D, Paule L, Shen XH, Yazdani R, Segerström U, Wallin JE et al. (1995). Can viable pollen carry Scots pine genes over long distances? Grana 34: 64-69.
37. Miguel-Pérez I, González-Martinez SC, Alía R, Gil L (2002). Growth phenology and mating system of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in central Spain. Invest Agr: Sist Recur For 11: 195-204.
38. Murawski DA, Gunatilleke IAUN, Bawa KS (1994). The effects of selective logging on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri Lanka. Conserv Biol 8: 997-1002.
39. Nanos N, González-Martinez SC, Bravo F (2004). Studying within-stand structure and dynamics with geostatistical and molecular marker tools. Forest Ecol Manag 189: 223-240.
40. O'Connell LM, Mosseler A, Rajora OP (2006). Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (Picea glauca) at the landscape level. Heredity 97: 418-426.
41. O'Connell LM, Russell J, Ritland K (2004). Fine-scale estimation of outcrossing in western redcedar with microsatellite assay of bulked DNA. Heredity 93: 443-449.
42. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Austerlitz F (2005). Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Spatial patterns of pollen flow and variance in male reproductive success inferred from parent-offspring. Mol Ecol 14: 4441-4452.
43. Okubo A, Levin SA (1989). A theoretical framework for data analysis of wind dispersal of seed and pollen. Ecology 70: 329-338.
44. Plomion C, LeProvost G, Pot D, Vendramin GG, Gerber S, Decroocq S et al. (2001). Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites. Can J Forest Research 31: 1816-1825.
45. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
46. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Alía R, Gil L (2004a). Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol 13: 2567-2577.
47. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2006). A new indirect method of estimating the pollen dispersal curve, independently of effective density. Genetics 173: 1033-1045.
48. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005). Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L.) revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
49. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Smouse PE, Gil L, Alía R (2004b). Pollen movement under alternative silvicultural practices in native populations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in central Spain. Forest Ecol Manag 197: 245-255.
50. Schoen DJ, Brown AHD (1991). Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 4494-4497.
51. Schuster WSF, Mitton JB (2000). Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84: 348-361.
52. Shea KL (1987). Effects of population structure and cone production on outcrossing rates in Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir. Evolution 41: 124-136.
53. Smouse P, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55: 260-271.
54. Smouse P, Meagher TR, Kobak CJ (1999). Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J Evol Biol 12: 1069-1077.
55. Smouse P, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ (2005). Measuring the genetic structure of the pollen pool as the probability of paternal identity. Heredity 94: 640-649.
56. Smouse P, Sork VL (2004). Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. Forest Ecol Manag 197: 21-38.
57. Sork VL, Smouse PE (2006). Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landscape Ecol 21: 821-836.
58. Tapias R, Climent J, Pardos JA, Gil L (2004). Life histories of Mediterranean pines. Plant Ecol 171: 53-68.
59. Torres AM, Weeden NF, Martín A (1993). Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor Appl Genet 93: 613-617.
60. Tufto J, Engen S, Hindar K (1997). Stochastic dispersal processes in plant populations. Theor Popul Biol 52: 16-26.
61. Van Treuren R, Bulsma R, Ouborg NJ, Kwak MM (1994). Relationships between plant density, outcrossing rates and seed set in natural and experimental populations of Scabiosa columbaria. J Evol Biol 7: 287-302.
62. Verdú M, González-Martínez SC, Montilla AI, Mateu I, Pannell JR (2006). Ovule discounting in an outcrossing, cryptically dioecious tree. Evolution 60: 2056-2063.
63. Wasieliwska M, LKlemm M, Burczyk J (2005). Genetic diversity and mating system of Scots pine plus trees. Dendrobiology 53: 57-62.
64. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002). Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from s humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 2038-2042.
65. Wolff K, Frisco B, Van Damme JMM (1988). Outcrossing rates and male sterility in natural populations of Plantago coronopus. Theor Appl Genet 76: 190-196.