Measuring the genetic structure of the pollen pool as the probability of paternal identity

Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 640-649

  Smouse, P E ^a,b   Robledo Arnuncio, J J ^b,c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

^c Ciudad Universitaria s n   (Spain)

Author keywords

Correlated paternity; Genetic diversity; Paternal analysis; Paternal identity; Pollen flow; Pollen structure

Indexed keywords

GENETIC STRUCTURE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; POLLEN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; SCOTS PINE;

MODELS, GENETIC; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; POLLEN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; SELECTION BIAS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 20444475850     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800674     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein E, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE et al (2004). Using genetic markers for the estimation of the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13: 937-954.
2. ft, pollen dispersal, and inter-female distance. Genetics 157: 851-857.
3. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2001b). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. III. Impact of within-population structure. Genet Res 78: 271-280.
4. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2002). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics 161: 355-363.
5. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002). Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighborhood model. Mol Ecol 11: 2379-2391.
6. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu J (1996). Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand. Heredity 77: 251-260.
7. Chakraborty R, Meagher T, Smouse PE (1988). Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118: 527-536.
8. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1993). Estimation of gene flow from F-statistics. Evolution 47: 855-863.
9. Crawford TJ (1984). The estimation of neighborhood parameters for plant populations. Heredity 52: 273-283.
10. Devlin B, Ellstrand NC (1990). The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution 44: 248-259.
11. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
12. Franco-Múgica F, Garcia-Antón M, Maldonado-Ruiz J, MorlaJuriasti C, Sainz-Ollero H (2001). The Holocene history of Pinus forests in the Spanish Northern Meseta. Holocene 11: 343-358.
13. Hardy OJ, González-Martínez SC, Colas B, Fréville H, Mignot A, Olivieri I (2004). Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae) II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168: 1601-1614.
14. Harju AM, Nikkanen T (1996). Reproductive success of orchard and nonorchard pollen during different stages of pollen shedding in a Scots pine seed orchard. Can J For Res 26: 1096-1102.
15. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995). Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82: 1420-1425.
16. Malécot G (1969). The Mathematics of Heredity. Freeman: San Fransisco.
17. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
18. Morton NE (1977). Isolation by distance in human populations. Ann Hum Genet 40: 361-365.
19. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press: New York.
20. Nei M, Roychoudhury AK (1974). Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76: 379-390.
21. Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve K (2003). Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol 12: 3157-3164.
22. Pamilo P (1993). Polyandry and allele frequency differences between the sexes in the ant Formica aquilonia. Heredity 70: 472-480.
23. Provan J, Soranzo N, Wilson NJ, Goldstein DB, Powell W (1999). A low mutation rate for chloroplast microsatellites. Genetics 153: 943-947.
24. Ritland K (1989). Correlated-matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43: 848-859.
25. Ritland K (2002). Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88: 221-228.
26. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Alía R, Gil L (2004). Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol 13: 2567-2577.
27. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005). Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
28. Rousset F (1997). Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 1219-1228.
29. Slatkin M (1993). Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution 47: 264-279.
30. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55: 260-271.
31. Smouse PE, Meagher TR (1994). Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136: 313-322.
32. Smouse PE, Meagher TR, Kobak CJ (1999). Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.): why do some males have disproportionate reproductive contributions? J Evolut Biol 12: 1056-1068.
33. Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004). Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: a comparison of alternative approaches. Forest Ecolo Manag 197: 21-38.
34. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1999). Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
35. Wright S (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
36. Wright S (1946). Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31: 39-59.