Parentage versus two-generation analyses for estimating pollen-mediated gene flow in plant populations

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 2525-2537

  Burczyk, Jaroslaw ^a   Koralewski, Tomasz E ^a  

^a KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Effective number; Gene flow; NEIGHBORHOOD model; Paternity; Pollen dispersal; TWOGENER

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; PLANT; POLLEN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; POLLEN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 21244466394     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02593.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams WT (1992) Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. New Forests, 6, 217-240.
2. Adams WT, Birkes DS (1991) Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In: Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees (eds Fineschi S, Malvolti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH), pp. 157-172. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
3. Adams WT, Burczyk J (2000) Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. In: Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice (eds Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T), pp. 215-224. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
4. FT, pollen dispersal and interfemale distance. Genetics, 157, 851-857.
5. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2001b) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. III. Impact of adult population structure. Genetic Research, 78, 271-280.
6. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2002) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics, 161, 355-363.
7. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C et al. (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Molecular Ecology, 13, 937-954.
8. Boshier DH (2000) Mating systems. In: Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice (eds Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T), pp. 63-79. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
9. Burczyk J, Prat D (1997) Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco: the effect of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity, 79, 638-647.
10. Burczyk J, Chybicki IJ (2004) Cautions on direct gene flow estimation in plant populations. Evolution, 58, 956-963.
11. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY (1996) Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand. Heredity, 77, 251-260.
12. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2379-2391.
13. Burczyk J, DiFazio SP, Adams WT (2004a) Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel? Forest Genetics, 11, 179-192.
14. Burczyk J, Lewandowski A, Chalupka W (2004b) Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Forest Ecology and Management, 197, 39-48.
15. Chase M, Kesseli R, Bawa K (1996) Microsatellite markers for population and conservation genetics of tropical trees. American Journal of Botany, 83, 51-57.
16. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.
17. Devlin B, Ellstrand NC (1990) The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution, 44, 248-259.
18. Devlin B, Roeder K, Ellstrand NC (1988) Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76, 369-380.
19. DiFazio SP, Slavov GT, Burczyk J, Leonardi S, Strauss SH (2004) Gene flow from tree plantations and implications for transgenic risk assessment. In: Plantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century (eds Walter C, Carson M), pp. 405-422. Research Signpost, Kerala, India.
20. Di-Giovanni F, Kevan PG (1991) Factors affecting pollen dynamics and its importance to pollen contamination: a review. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 1155-1170.
21. Di-Giovanni F, Kevan PG, Arnold J (1996) Lower planetary boundary layer profiles of atmospheric conifer pollen above a seed orchard in northern Ontario, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 83, 87-97.
22. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998) High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. Journal of Heredity, 89, 62-70.
23. Dyer RJ, Sork VL (2001) Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Molecular Ecology, 10, 859-866.
24. Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL, Smouse PE (2004) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape V: a stepwise approach for extracting factors contributing to pollen structure. Heredity, 92, 204-211.
25. Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos, 63, 77-86.
26. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479-491.
27. Hamrick JL, Nason JD (2000) Gene flow in forest trees. In: Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice (eds Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T), pp. 81-90. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
28. Hedrick PW (1999) Genetics of Populations. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston.
29. Hjelmroos M (1991) Evidence of long-distance transport of Betula pollen. Grana, 30, 215-228.
30. Konuma A, Tsumura Y, Lee CT, Lee SL, Okuda T (2000) Estimation of gene flow in the tropical-rainforest tree Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae), inferred from paternity analysis. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1843-1852.
31. Latouche-Halle C, Ramboier A, Bandou E, Caron H, Kremer A (2004) Long-distance pollen flow and tolerance to selfing in a Neotropical tree species. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1055-1226.
32. Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 183-189.
33. Lian CL, Miwa M, Hogetsu T (2001) Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity, 87, 88-98.
34. Lindgren D, Paule L, Shen XH et al. (1995) Can viable pollen carry Scots pine genes over long distances? Grana, 34, 64-69.
35. Nason JD, Hamrick JL (1997) Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of Neotropical canopy trees. Journal of Heredity, 88, 264-276.
36. Nason JD, Herre EA, Hamrick JL (1998) The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature, 391, 685-687.
37. Oddou-Muratorio S, Houot M-L, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F (2003) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3427-3439.
38. Rieseberg LH, Burke JM (2001) The biological reality of species: gene flow, selection, and collective evolution. Taxon, 50, 47-67.
39. Ritland K (1989) Correlated matings in the partial selfer Mimulus guttatus. Evolution, 43, 848-859.
40. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity, 88, 221-228.
41. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Smouse PE, Gil L, Alia R (2004) Pollen movement under alternative silvicultural practices in native populations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in central Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 197, 245-255.
42. Rogers CA, Levetin E (1998) Evidence of long-distance transport of mountain cedar pollen into Tulsa, Oklahoma. International Journal of Biometeorology, 42, 65-72.
43. Schnabel A (1998) Parentage analysis in plants: mating systems, gene flow, and relative fertilities. In: Advances in Molecular Ecology (ed. Carvalho GR), pp. 173-189. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
44. Smith DB, Adams WT (1983) Measuring pollen contamination in clonal seed orchards with the aid of genetic markers. In: Proceedings of the 20th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, pp. 69-77, University of Georgia, Athens, Greece.
45. Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004) Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. Forest Ecology and Management, 197, 21-38.
46. Smouse PE, Meagher T, Kobak C (1999) Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12(6), 1069-1077.
47. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution, 55, 260-271.
48. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF (1999) Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14 (6), 219-224.
49. Sork VL, Davis F, Smouse PE et al. (2002a) Pollen movement in declining populations of California valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Molecular Ecology, 11, 1657-1668.
50. Sork VL, Dyer RJ, Davis FW, Smouse PE (2002b) Mating patterns in a savanna population of valley oak (Quercus lobata Neé). In: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Oak Woodlands: Oaks in California's Changing Landscape, October 22-25, 2001 (eds Standiford R, McCreary D, Purcell KL), pp. 427-439. Pacific SW Research Station, US Forest Service, USDA, San Diego, California.
51. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1999) Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecular Ecology, 8, 831-841.
52. Williams CG, Savolainen O (1996) Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. Forest Science, 42, 102-117.