Distractor frequency effects in picture-word interference tasks with vocal and manual responses

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 615-632

  Hutson, James ^a   Damian, Markus F ^a   Spalek, Katharina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distractor frequency; Language production; Response exclusion; Speaking; Word production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; DISTRACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84879172860     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.605599     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abdel Rahman, R. and Aristei, S. 2010. Now you see it,... and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17: 657 - 661.
2. Abdel Rahman, R. and Melinger, A. 2009. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24: 713 - 734.
3. Alario, F.-X., Segui, J. and Ferrand, L. 2000. Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A: 741 - 764.
4. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. and Bates, D. M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59: 390 - 412.
5. Bates, D. 2005. Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5: 27 - 30.
6. Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Szekely, A., Andonova, E. Devescovi, A. 2003. Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10: 344 - 380.
7. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A. and Chalard, M. 2003. A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35: 158 - 167.
8. Caramazza, A. 1997. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 177 - 208.
9. Caramazza, A. and Costa, A. 2000. The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Does the response set matter?. Cognition, 75: B51 - B64.
10. Connine, C. M. and Titone, D. 1996. Phoneme monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11: 635 - 645.
11. Cook, A. E. and Meyer, A. S. 2008. Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34: 886 - 899.
12. Costa, A., Alario, F.-X. and Caramazza, A. 2005. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12: 125 - 131.
13. Damian, M. F. and Abdel Rahman, R. 2003. Semantic priming in the name retrieval of objects and famous faces. British Journal of Psychology, 94: 517 - 527.
14. Damian, M. F. and Martin, R. C. 1999. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25: 345 - 361.
15. Davis, C. J. 2005. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37: 65 - 70.
16. Dell, G. S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 3: 283 - 321.
17. Dhooge, E. and Hartsuiker, R. J. 2010. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36: 878 - 891.
18. Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. 2011. The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: Further evidence for response exclusion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18 1, 116 - 122.
19. Dyer, F. N. 1973. The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition, 1: 106 - 120.
20. Ferreira, V. S. and Pashler, H. 2002. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28: 1187 - 1199.
21. Finkbeiner, M. and Caramazza, A. 2006. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stoop-like task. Cortex, 6: 790 - 796.
22. Forster, K. I. and Forster, J. C. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35: 116 - 124.
23. Foss, D. J. 1969. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8: 457 - 462.
24. Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E. and Steinman, R. J. 1971. Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91: 59 - 65.
25. Frauenfelder, U. H. and Segui, J. 1989. Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects. Memory & Cognition, 17: 134 - 140.
26. Glaser, W. R. 1992. Picture naming. Cognition, 42: 61 - 106.
27. Glaser, W. R. and Düngelhoff, F.-J. 1984. The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10: 640 - 654.
28. Glaser, M. O. and Glaser, W. R. 1982. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8: 875 - 894.
29. Hartsuiker, R. J. and Kolk, H. H. J. 2001. Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42: 113 - 157.
30. Huang, J., Carr, T. H. and Cao, Y. 2001. Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 15: 39 - 53.
31. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z. and Caramazza, A. 2008. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34: 249 - 256.
32. Jescheniak, J. D. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20: 824 - 843.
33. Klein, G. S. 1964. Semantic power measured through the interference ofwords with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77: 576 - 588.
34. La Heij, W. 1988. Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16: 400 - 410.
35. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1 - 75.
37. Lupker, S. J. 1979. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7: 485 - 495.
38. Lupker, S. J. and Katz, A. N. 1981. Input, decision, and response factors in picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7: 269 - 282.
39. MacLeod, C. M. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 163 - 203.
40. Mahon, B., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, R. A. and Caramazza, A. 2007. Lexical selection is not competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33: 503 - 533.
41. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88: 375 - 407.
42. Miozzo, M. and Caramazza, A. 2003. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132: 228 - 252.
43. Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D. and Ellis, A. W. 1997. Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A: 528 - 559.
44. Morton, J. 1969. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76: 165 - 178.
45. Oldfield, R. C. and Wingfield, A. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17: 273 - 281.
46. Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. 2010. Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Memory & Cognition. 38 8, 1147 - 1160
47. Oppenheim, G. M. and Dell, G. S. 2008. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106: 528 - 537.
48. Özdemir, R., Roelofs, A. and Levelt, W. J. M. 2007. Perceptual uniqueness point effects in monitoring internal speech. Cognition, 105: 457 - 465.
49. Pashler, H. and Johnston, J. C. 1989. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A: 19 - 45.
50. Protopapas, A. 2007. CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavioral Research Methods, 39: 859 - 862.
51. Rapp, B. and Goldrick, M. 2000. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107: 460 - 499.
52. Roelofs, A. 1992. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42: 107 - 142.
53. Roelofs, A. 2003. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110: 88 - 125.
54. Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M. and Kukish, K. S. 1975. Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46: 247 - 253.
55. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1990. Exploring the time course of lexical access in production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 86 - 102.
56. Schweinberger, S. R., Burton, A. M. and Kelly, S. W. 2001. Priming the access to names of famous faces. Journal of British Psychology, 92: 303 - 317.
57. Simon, S. J. and Sudalaimuthu, P. 1979. Effects of S mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5: 176 - 187.
58. Singh, A., & Damian, M. F. 2009. How much do we rely on phonology in orthographic word production? A grapheme-monitoring task. Unpublished manuscript.
59. Snodgrass, J. G. and Vanderwart, M. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6: 174 - 215.
60. Stadthagen-Gonzales, H. and Davis, C. 2006. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38: 598 - 605.
61. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1995. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21: 686 - 698.
62. Starreveld, P. A. and La Heij, W. 1996. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 869 - 918.
63. Stemberger, J. P. 1985. " An interactive activation model of language production ". In Progress in the psychology of language, Edited by: Ellis, A. W. Vol. 1, 143 - 186. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Van Casteren, M. and Davis, M. H. 2007. Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 38: 584 - 589.
65. Wheeldon, L. 2000. " Generating prosodic structure ". In Aspects of language production, Edited by: Wheeldon, L. R. 249 - 274. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
66. Wheeldon, L. and Lahiri, A. 1997. Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37: 356 - 381.
67. Wheeldon, L. R. and Levelt, W. J. M. 1995. Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34: 311 - 334.
68. Wheeldon, L. R. and Morgan, J. L. 2002. Phoneme monitoring in internal and external speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17: 503 - 535.
69. Wurm, L. H. and Samuel, A. G. 1997. Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 36: 165 - 187.