Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 165-187

  Wurm, Lee H ^a,b   Samuel, Arthur G ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031067485     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2482     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814.
2. CONNINE, C. M., BLASKO, D. G., & TITONE, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.
3. CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. G. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New Approaches to Language Mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland.
5. FOSS, D. J. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 457-462.
6. FOSS, D. J., & LYNCH, R. H., JR. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure on decision times. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 145-148.
7. FOSS, D. J., & BLANK, M. A. (1980). Identifying the speech codes. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 1-31.
8. FRAUENFELDER, U. H., SEGUI, J., & DIJKSTRA, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 77-91.
9. GANONG, W. F. III. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110-125.
10. GROSJEAN, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.
11. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes (pp. 125-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. MARSLEN-WILSON, W., & WELSH, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
13. MASSARO, D. W. (1988). Some criticisms of connectionist models of human performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 213-234.
14. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
15. MORTON, J. A. (1969). Interaction of information in word perception. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
16. NORRIS, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
17. PASHLER, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
18. PITT, M. A., & SAMUEL, A. G. (1990). Attentional allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 611-632.
19. POSNER, M. I., & BOIES, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
20. RUBIN, P., TURVEY, M. T., & VAN GELDER, P. (1976). Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 394-398.
21. SAMUEL, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
22. SAMUEL, A. G. (in press). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
23. TYLER, L. K., & WESSELS, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 409-420.
24. WURM, L. H., & SAMUEL, A. G. (1995). [Phoneme-and frequency modulation monitoring times as a function of nonword type.] Unpublished raw data.