The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: Further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 116-122

  Dhooge, Elisah ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Distractor frequency effect; Picture word interference task; Response exclusion hypothesis; Weaver++; Word production

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 79951854437     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0026-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia: CD-ROM.
2. Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(A), 1019-1038.doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1019
3. Catling, J. C., Dent, K., Johnston, R. A., & Balding, R. (2010). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1304-1317.doi:10.1080/17470210903380830
4. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
5. Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 878-891.doi:10.1037/a0019128
6. Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1187-1199.doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.6.1187
7. Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42, 790-796.
8. Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Modulating the masked congruence priming effect with the hands and the mouth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 894-918. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.894
9. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects on Stroop like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
10. Goldinger, S. D., Azuma, T., Abramson, M., & Jain, P. (1997). Open wide and say "Blah!": Attentional dynamics of delayed naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 190-216.
11. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. K. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113-157.
12. Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 249-256.doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249
13. Levelt, W. M. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
14. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
15. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-533.doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
16. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
17. McLeod, P., & Posner, M. I. (1984). Privileged loops from percept to act. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance (X) (pp. 55-66). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
18. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-252.doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228
19. Roelofs, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 10, 88-125.doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.001
20. Roelofs, A. (2005). From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 313-330). Hillsdale: LEA.
21. Severens, E., Van Lommel, S., Ratinckx, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119, 159-187.doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002
22. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production-picture word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.