Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 673-681

  Fingeret, Michelle Cororve ^a   Nipomnick, Summer W ^a   Crosby, Melissa A ^a   Reece, Gregory P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Body image; Breast reconstruction; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY DISORDER; BODY IMAGE; BODY MASS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER THERAPY; COGNITION; COMORBIDITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COST CONTROL; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MASTECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL WELLBEING; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUAL WELLBEING; SEXUALITY; SMOKING; SOCIAL WELLBEING; WELLBEING;

BODY IMAGE; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 84878900729     PISSN: 03057372     EISSN: 15321967     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.010     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Chen C.M., Cano S.J., Klassen A.F., et al. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Breast J 2010, 16:587-597.
2. Ching S., Thoma A., McCabe R.E., Antony M.M. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:469-480. [discussion 81-2].
3. Lee C., Sunu C., Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 2009, 209:123-133.
4. Pockaj B.A., Degnim A.C., Boughey J.C., et al. Quality of life after breast cancer surgery: what have we learned and where should we go next?. J Surg Oncol 2009, 99:447-455.
5. Pusic A.L., Chen C.M., Cano S., et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 120:823-837. [discussion 38-9].
6. Winters Z.E., Benson J.R., Pusic A.L. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient- reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg 2010, 252:929-942.
7. Anderson R.C., Cunningham B., Tafesse E., Lenderking W.R. Validation of the breast evaluation questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 118:597-602.
8. Baxter N.N., Goodwin P.J., McLeod R.S., Dion R., Devins G., Bombardier C. Reliability and validity of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire. Breast J 2006, 12:221-232.
9. Dalton E.J., Rasmussen V.N., Classen C.C., et al. Sexual Adjustment and Body Image Scale (SABIS): a new measure for breast cancer patients. Breast J 2009, 15:287-290.
10. Hopwood P., Fletcher I., Lee A., Ghazal S. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2001, 37:189-197.
11. Pusic A.L., Klassen A.F., Scott A.M., Klok J.A., Cordeiro P.G., Cano S.J. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009, 124:345-353.
12. Temple C.L., Cook E.F., Ross D.C., Bettger-Hahn M., MacDermid J. Development of a breast reconstruction satisfaction questionnaire (BRECON): dimensionality and clinical importance of breast symptoms, donor site issues, patient expectations, and relationships. J Surg Oncol 2010, 101:209-216.
13. Morrow M., Pusic A.L. Time for a new era in outcomes reporting for breast reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011, 103:5-7.
14. Engel G.L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977, 196:129-136.
15. Borrell-Carrio F., Suchman A.L., Epstein R.M. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2004, 2:576-582.
16. Linder-Pelz S.U. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 1982, 16:577-582.
17. Sitzia J., Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997, 45:1829-1843.
18. Pruzinsky T., Cash T.F. Integrative themes in body-image development, deviance and change. Body images: development, deviance and change 1990, Guilford Press, New York. T.F. Cash, T. Pruzinsky (Eds.).
19. Cella D. Quality-of-life measurement in oncology. Psychosocial intervnetions for cancer 2001, 57-76. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. A. Baum, B.L. Andersen (Eds.).
20. Klassen A.F., Pusic A.L., Scott A., Klok J., Cano S.J. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2009, 9:11.
21. Avis M., Bond M., Arthur A. Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. Journal of advanced nursing 1995, 22:316-322.
22. Carr-Hill R.A. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med 1992, 14:236-249.
23. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?. Soc Sci Med 1994, 38:509-516.
24. Contant C.M., van Wersch A.M., Wiggers T., Wai R.T., van Geel A.N. Motivations, satisfaction, and information of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patient Educ Couns 2000, 40:201-208.
25. Waljee J.F., Hawley S., Alderman A.K., Morrow M., Katz S.J. Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter?. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:3694-3698.
26. Waljee J.F., Hu E.S., Newman L.A., Alderman A.K. Correlates of patient satisfaction and provider trust after breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 2008, 112:1679-1687.
27. Avis M., Bond M., Arthur A. Questioning patient satisfaction: An empirical investigation in two outpatient clinics. Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:85-92.
28. Williams B., Coyle J., Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998, 47:1351-1359.
29. Mazor K.M., Clauser B.E., Field T., Yood R.A., Gurwitz J.H. A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys. Health Serv Res 2002, 37:1403-1417.
30. Cohen G., Forbes J., Garraway M. Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys. BMJ 1996, 313:841-844.
31. Pruzinsky T. Enhancing quality of life in medical populations: a vision for body image assessment and rehabilitation as standards of care. Body Image 2004, 1:71-81.
32. White C.A. Body image dimensions and cancer: a heuristic cognitive behavioural model. Psychooncology 2000, 9:183-192.
33. Cash T.F., Labarge A.S. Development of the Appearance Schemas Inventory: A new cognitive body-image assessment. Cogn Ther Res 1996, 20:37-50.
34. Cash T.F. Cognitive-behavioral perspectives on body image. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice 2011, 39-47. The Guilford Press, New York. T.F. Cash, L. Smolak (Eds.).
35. Fingeret M.C. Psychosocial impact of breast cancer treatment. Advanced therapy of breast disease 2012, 1289-1304. People's Medical Publishing House, Shelton (CT, USA). 3rd ed. G. Babiera, F.J. Esteva, R. Skoracki (Eds.).
36. Fingeret M.C. Body image and disfigurement. MD Anderson manual of psychosocial oncology 2010, 271-288. McGraw Hill, New York. J. Duffy, A. Valentine (Eds.).
37. Annunziata M.A., Giovannini L., Muzzatti B. Assessing the body image: relevance, application and instruments for oncological settings. Support Care Cancer 2012, 20:901-907.
38. Velikova G., Stark D., Selby P. Quality of life instruments in oncology. Eur J Cancer 1999, 35:1571-1580.
39. Cella D.F. Measuring quality of life in palliative care. Semin Oncol 1995, 22:73-81.
40. Schover L.R. The impact of breast cancer on sexuality, body image, and intimate relationships. CA Cancer J Clin 1991, 41:112-120.
41. Ussher J.M., Perz J., Gilbert E. Changes to sexual well-being and intimacy after breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 2012, 456-465.
42. Al-Ghazal S.K., Fallowfield L., Blamey R.W. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 2000, 36:1938-1943.
43. Hartl K., Janni W., Kastner R., et al. Impact of medical and demographic factors on long-term quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2003, 14:1064-1071.
44. Han J., Grothuesmann D., Neises M., Hille U., Hillemanns P. Quality of life and satisfaction after breast cancer operation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010, 282:75-82.
45. Nicholson R.M., Leinster S., Sassoon E.M. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast 2007, 16:396-410.
46. Cocquyt V.F., Blondeel P.N., Depypere H.T., et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg 2003, 56:462-470.
47. Heneghan H.M., Prichard R.S., Lyons R., et al. Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy - a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011, 37:937-943.
48. Atisha D., Alderman A.K., Lowery J.C., Kuhn L.E., Davis J., Wilkins E.G. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 2008, 247:1019-1028.
49. Elder E.E., Brandberg Y., Bjorklund T., et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 2005, 14:201-208.
50. Wilkins E.G., Cederna P.S., Lowery J.C., et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 106:1014-1025. [discussion 26-7].
51. Al-Ghazal S.K., Sully L., Fallowfield L., Blamey R.W. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000, 26:17-19.
52. Nano M.T., Gill P.G., Kollias J., Bochner M.A., Carter N., Winefield H.R. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. ANZ J Surg 2005, 75:445-453. [discussion 371-2].
53. Alderman A.K., Kuhn L.E., Lowery J.C., Wilkins E.G. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg 2007, 204:7-12.
54. Alderman A.K., Wilkins E.G., Lowery J.C., Kim M., Davis J.A. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 106:769-776.
55. Saulis A.S., Mustoe T.A., Fine N.A. A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 119:1669-1676. [discussion 77-8].
56. Cordeiro P.G., Pusic A.L., Disa J.J., McCormick B., VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004, 113:877-881.
57. McCarthy C.M., Klassen A.F., Cano S.J., et al. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants. Cancer 2010, 116:5584-5591.
58. Nava M.B., Pennati A.E., Lozza L., Spano A., Zambetti M., Catanuto G. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 128:353-359.
59. Colakoglu S., Khansa I., Curtis M.S., et al. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 127:1428-1436.
60. Buck D.W., Shenaq D., Heyer K., Kato C., Kim J.Y. Patient-subjective cosmetic outcomes following the varying stages of tissue expander breast reconstruction: the importance of completion. Breast 2010, 19:521-526.
61. Kulkarni A.R., Katz S., Hamilton A.S., Graff J.J., Alderman A.K. Patterns of use and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction among obese patients: results from a population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012, 130:263-270.
62. Momeni A., Ahdoot M.A., Kim R.Y., Leroux E., Galaiya D.J., Lee G.K. Should we continue to consider obesity a relative contraindication for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012, 65:420-425.
63. Atisha D.M., Alderman A.K., Kuhn L.E., Wilkins E.G. The impact of obesity on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008, 121:1893-1899.
64. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999, 11:319-328.
65. Harcourt D.M., Rumsey N.J., Ambler N.R., et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:1060-1068.
66. Roth R.S., Lowery J.C., Davis J., Wilkins E.G. Psychological factors predict patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 119:2008-2015. [discussion 16-7].
67. Brunault P., Suzanne I., Trzepidur-Edom M., et al. Depression is associated with some patient-perceived cosmetic changes, but not with radiotherapy-induced late toxicity, in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.3038. [Epub ahead of print].
68. Baucom D.H., Porter L.S., Kirby J.S., Gremore T.M., Keefe F.J. Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer. Breast disease 2005, 23:103-113.
69. Fobair P., Stewart S.L., Chang S., D'Onofrio C., Banks P.J., Bloom J.R. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006, 15:579-594.
70. Girotto J.A., Schreiber J., Nahabedian M.Y. Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life. Ann Plast Surg 2003, 50:572-578.
71. Ellsworth W.A., Bass B.L., Skoracki R.J., Heller L. Breast reconstruction in women under 30: a 10-year experience. Breast J 2011, 17:18-23.
72. Nelson J.A., Nelson P., Tchou J., Serletti J.M., Wu L.C. The ethnic divide in breast reconstruction: a review of the current literature and directions for future research. Cancer Treat Rev 2012, 38:362-367.
73. Christian C.K., Niland J., Edge S.B., et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg 2006, 243:241-249.
74. Chen J.Y., Malin J., Ganz P.A., et al. Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction. J Gen Int Med 2009, 24:99-104.
75. Chen C.L., Shore A.D., Johns R., Clark J.M., Manahan M., Makary M.A. The impact of obesity on breast surgery complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 128:395e-402e.
76. Chang D.W., Reece G.P., Wang B., et al. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 105:2374-2380.
77. Gritz E.R., Fingeret M.C., Vidrine D.J., Lazev A.B., Mehta N.V., Reece G.P. Successes and failures of the teachable moment: smoking cessation in cancer patients. Cancer 2006, 106:17-27.
78. Cash T.F., Smolak L. Body image: a handbook of theory, research and clinical practice 2011, The Guilford Press, New York. 2nd ed.
79. Salgarello M., Rochira D., Barone-Adesi L., Farallo E. Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Skin- or Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Previously Augmented Patients: A Personal Technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012, 106:313-322.
80. Bellino S., Fenocchio M., Zizza M., Rocca G., Bogetti P., Bogetto F. Quality of life of patients who undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy: effects of personality characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 127:10-17.
81. Shridharani S.M., Magarakis M., Manson P.N., Rodriguez E.D. Psychology of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic clinical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 126:2243-2251.
82. Gopie J.P., Timman R., Hilhorst M.T., Hofer S.O., Mureau M.A., Tibben A. The short-term psychological impact of complications after breast reconstruction. Psychooncology 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.2089. [Epub ahead of print].
83. Krishnasamy M. Social support and the patient with cancer: a consideration of the literature. J Adv Nurs 1996, 23:757-762.
84. Rumsey N., Harcourt D. The psychology of appearance 2005, Open University Press, Berkshire.
85. Rumsey N., Byron-Daniel J., Charlton R., et al. Identifying the psychosocial factors and processes contributing to successful adjustment to disfiguring conditions 2008, Appearance Research Collaboration, Bristol (England).
86. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping 1984, Springer Publishing Company, New York.
87. Stanton A.L., Danoff-Burg S., Cameron C.L., et al. Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000, 68:875-882.
88. Schroevers M.J., Teo I. The report of posttraumatic growth in Malaysian cancer patients: relationships with psychological distress and coping strategies. Psychooncology 2008, 17:1239-1246.
89. Ueda S., Tamaki Y., Yano K., et al. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surgery 2008, 143:414-425.
90. Didier F., Radice D., Gandini S., et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009, 118:623-633.
91. Fuller S., Anderson R.C. Adjustment issues related to bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at elevated risk of developing breast cancer. Plast Surg Nurs 2009, 29:33-38.
92. den Heijer M., Seynaeve C., Timman R., et al. Body image and psychological distress after prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Eur J Cancer 2012, 48:1263-1268.
93. Macadam S.A., Ho A.L., Cook E.F., Lennox P.A., Pusic A.L. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 125:761-771.
94. Craft R.O., Colakoglu S., Curtis M.S., et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 127:1417-1424.
95. Abu-Nab Z., Grunfeld E.A. Satisfaction with outcome and attitudes towards scarring among women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 66:243-249.
96. De Morgan S., Redman S., D'Este C., Rogers K. Knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Patient Educ Couns 2011, 84:62-68.
97. Thomson H.J., Potter S., Greenwood R.J., et al. A prospective longitudinal study of cosmetic outcome in immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and the influence of radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008, 15:1081-1091.
98. Kim M.S., Sbalchiero J.C., Reece G.P., Miller M.J., Beahm E.K., Markey M.K. Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008, 121:186e-194e.
99. Lowery J.C., Wilkins E.G., Kuzon W.M., Davis J.A. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg 1996, 36:601-606. [discussion 7].
100. Potter S., Harcourt D., Cawthorn S., et al. Assessment of cosmesis after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:813-823.
101. Dabeer M., Fingeret M.C., Merchant F., Reece G.P., Beahm E.K., Markey M.K. A research agenda for appearance changes due to breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 2008, 2:1-3.
102. Galdino G.M., Nahabedian M., Chiaramonte M., Geng J.Z., Klatsky S., Manson P. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002, 110:58-70.
103. Liu C., Luan J., Mu L., Ji K. The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 126:2125-2132.
104. Udpa N, Sampat MP, Kim MS, Reece GP, Markey MK. Objective assessment of the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: toward automatic localization of fiducial points on digital photographs. Medical Imaging 2007: Computer-aided Diagnosis, Proceedings of the SPIE 6514: 65142O1-9 2007.
105. White C.A. Body images in oncology. Body image: A handbook of theory, research and clinical practice 2002, 379-386. The Guilford Press, New York. T.F. Cash, T. Pruzinsky (Eds.).
106. Fingeret M.C., Yuan Y., Urbauer D., Weston J., Nipomnick S., Weber R. The nature and extent of body image concerns among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology 2012, 21:836-844.
107. Spector D., Mayer D.K., Knafl K., Pusic A. Not what I expected: informational needs of women undergoing breast surgery. Plast Surg Nurs 2010, 30:70-74. [quiz 5-6].
108. Snell L., McCarthy C., Klassen A., et al. Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 126:1825-1830.
109. Pusic A.L., Klassen A.F., Snell L., et al. Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012, 12:149-158.