The short-term psychological impact of complications after breast reconstruction

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 290-298

  Gopie, Jessica P ^a   Timman, Reinier ^b   Hilhorst, Medard T ^b   Hofer, Stefan O P ^c   Mureau, Marc A M ^b   Tibben, Aad ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

breast reconstruction; cancer; mastectomy; oncology; psychological well being; short term complications

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR FLAP; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT FAILURE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEROMA; SKIN NECROSIS; SURGICAL INFECTION; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ADULT; ANXIETY; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 84873406862     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.2089     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L,. A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 66-74.
2. Damen THC, Timman R, Kunst EH, et al,. High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 93-100.
3. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al,. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1014-1025.
4. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al,. Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, Latissimus Flap, and Implant Techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1585-1595.
5. Damen THC, Mureau MAM, Timman R, Rakhorst HA, Hofer SOP,. The pleasing end result after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a review of additional operations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 71-76.
6. Hofer SOP, Damen THC, Mureau MAM, Rakhorst HA, Roche NA,. A critical review of perioperative complications in 175 free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 137-142.
7. Sullivan SR, Fletcher DRD, Isom CD, Isik FF,. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 19-28.
8. Woerdeman LAE, Hage JJ, Hofland MMI, Rutgers EJT,. A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 455-463.
9. Potter S, Thomson HJ, Greenwood RJ, Hopwood P, Winters ZE,. Health-related quality of life assessment after breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 613-620.
10. Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, Djohan R, Nutter B, Lyons J, Dietz J,. Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 202-210.
11. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al,. Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1886-1892.
12. Delgado JF, Garcia-Guilarte RF, Palazuelo MR, Mendez JIS, Perez CC,. Immediate breast reconstruction with direct, anatomic, gel-cohesive, extra-projection prosthesis: 400 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1599-1605.
13. Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ, et al,. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 1477-1482.
14. Blondeel PN,. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg 1999; 52: 104-111.
15. Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MHC,. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 86-95.
16. Reefy S, Patani N, Anderson A, Burgoyne G, Osman H, Mokbel K,. Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 171-183.
17. Christante D, Pommier SJ, Diggs BS, et al,. Using complications associated with postmastectomy radiation and immediate breast reconstruction to improve surgical decision making. Arch Surg 2010; 145: 873-878.
18. Chew BK, Yip C, Malyon AD,. Becker expander implants: truly a long term single stage reconstruction? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 1300-1304.
19. Baumann DP, Lin HY, Chevray PM,. Perforator number predicts fat necrosis in a prospective analysis of breast reconstruction with free TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1335-1341.
20. Cimprich B,. Pretreatment symptom distress in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1999; 22: 185-194.
21. Kennedy F, Harcourt D, Rumsey N, White P,. The psychosocial impact of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a longitudinal prospective study. Breast 2010; 19: 382-387.
22. Montgomery GH, Bovbjerg DH,. Presurgery distress and specific response expectancies predict postsurgery outcomes in surgery patients confronting breast cancer. Health Psychol 2004; 23: 381-387.
23. Andersen BL, Farrar WB, Golden-Kreutz D, et al,. Stress and immune responses after surgical treatment for regional breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 30-36.
24. Angele MK, Faist E,. Clinical review: immunodepression in the surgical patient and increased susceptibility to infection. Crit Care 2002; 6: 298-305.
25. Allen RJ, Treece P,. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 32-38.
26. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP,. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370.
27. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PPA, Kempen GIJM, Speckens AEM, VanHemert AM,. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 363-370.
28. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D,. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52: 69-77.
29. van der Ploeg E, Mooren TTM, Kleber RJ, van der Velden PG, Brom D,. Construct validation of the Dutch version of the impact of event scale. Psychol Assess 2004; 16: 16-26.
30. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W,. Impact of event scale: measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979; 41: 209-218.
31. Joseph S,. Psychometric evaluation of Horowitz's impact of event scale: a review. J Trauma Stress 2000; 13: 101-113.
32. Horowitz MJ,. Stress response syndromes and their treatment. In, Goldberger L, Breznitz S, (ed.), Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. The Free Press: New York, 1982; 711-732.
33. Paice JA, Cohen FL,. Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity. Cancer Nurs 1997; 20: 88-93.
34. Kremer E, Atkinson JH, Ignelzi RJ,. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 1981; 10: 241-248.
35. Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, 1988.
36. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, et al,. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1711-1719.
37. Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, et al,. Bilateral breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: an experience with 280 flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52: 246-252.
38. Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J, Dobke MK,. Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain 1996; 66: 195-205.
39. Bar-Meir ED, Yueh JH, Hess PE, et al,. Postoperative pain management in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: identification of patients with poor pain control. Eplasty 2010; 10: 483-491.
40. Bresser PJC, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR, et al,. The course of distress in women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer due to an (identified) genetic susceptibility who opt for prophylactic mastectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 95-103.
41. Torer N, Nursal TZ, Caliskan K, et al,. The effect of the psychological status of breast cancer patients on the short-term clinical outcome after mastectomy. Acta Chir Belg 2010; 110: 467-470.
42. Lam WWT, Bonanno GA, Mancini AD, et al,. Trajectories of psychological distress among Chinese women diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 2010; 19: 1044-1051.
43. Lam WWT, Shing YT, Bonanno GA, Mancini AD, Fielding R,. Distress trajectories at the first year diagnosis of breast cancer in relation to 6 years survivorship. Psycho-Oncology 2010. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1876.
44. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R,. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol 1998; 53: 1209-1218.