Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 247, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1019-1028

  Atisha, Dunya ^a,b   Alderman, Amy K ^a,c   Lowery, Julie C ^c   Kuhn, Latoya E ^c   Davis, Jenny ^c   Wilkins, Edwin G ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b ST JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c VA ANN ARBOR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT T TEST; TRANSVERSE RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44449121918     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1014-1025.
2. Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, et al. Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:940-947.
3. Al-Ghazal SK, Sully L, Falllowfield L, et al. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:17-19.
4. Al-Ghazal S, Fallowfield L, Blamey R. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy, and breast conservation. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938-1943.
5. Wellisch D, Schain W, Noone B, et al. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:713-718.
6. Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L. A prospective and randomized study "SVEA" comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:66-74.
7. Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R, et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:686-691.
8. Gylbert L, Asplund O, Jurell G. Capsular contracture after breast reconstruction with silicone-gel and saline-filled implants: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:373-377.
9. Alderman AK, Wilkins E, Kim M, et al. Complications in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: two year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
10. Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL, et al. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:29-36.
11. McCraw JB, Horton CE, Grossman JA, et al. An early appraisal of the methods of tissue expansion and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;18:93-113.
12. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction. II. TRAM flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1710-1716.
13. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1702-1709.
14. Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, et al. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:7-12.
15. Baker RR. The management of breast cancer with immediate or delayed reconstruction. Adv Surg. 1992;25:51-64.
16. Wenzel LB, Fairclough DL, Brady MJ, et al. Age related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment. Cancer. 1999;86:1768-1774.
17. Schover LR, Yetman RJ, Tuason IJ, et al. Partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction: a comparison of their effects on psychosocial adjustment, body image, and sexuality. Cancer. 1995;75:54-64.
18. Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1060-1068.
19. Roth R, Lowery J, Davis J, et al. Quality of life and affective distress in women seeking immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:993-1002.
20. Anderson SG, Rodin J, Ariyan S. Treatment consideration in postmastectomy reconstruction. Their relative importance and relationship to patient satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33:263-270.
21. Fung KW, Lay Y, Fielding R, et al. The impact of mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstruction on the quality of life in Chinese women. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:202-206.
22. Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:823-837.
23. Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, et al. Persistent pain following postmastectomy reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:371-376.
24. Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patient satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicle or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1142-1153.
25. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:769-776.
26. Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:455-462.
27. Kroll SS, Coffey JA, Winn RJ, et al. A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:860-864.
28. Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:49-62.
29. Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:63-70.