Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction

Cancer

Volumn 116, Issue 24, 2010, Pages 5584-5591

  McCarthy, Colleen M ^a   Klassen, Anne F ^b   Cano, Stefan J ^c   Scott, Amie ^a   Vanlaeken, Nancy ^d   Lennox, Peter A ^d   Alderman, Amy K ^e   Mehrara, Babak J ^a   Disa, Joseph J ^a   Cordeiro, Peter G ^a   Pusic, Andrea L ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; breast implants; breast reconstruction; breast surgery; mammoplasty; patient satisfaction; patient reported outcomes; saline; silicone

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NORTH AMERICA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILICONE PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SILICONES; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 78650148975     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25552     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants After In-Depth Evaluation. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006. Available at:. Accessed May 11, 2009.
2. Rohrich RJ, Reece EM., Breast augmentation today: saline versus silicone-what are the facts? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 669-672.
3. Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA,. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 768-779.; discussion 780-781.
4. Cordeiro PG,. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1590-1601.
5. European Medicines Agency. Reflection Paper on the Regulatory Guidance for the Use of the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2008. Available at:. Accessed May 11, 2009.
6. US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006. Available at:. Accessed May 11, 2009.
7. Revicki DA,. FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet. 2007; 369: 540-542.
8. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ,. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the Breast-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 345-353.
9. Dillman DA., Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2000.
10. Nissen MJ, Swenson KK, Kind EA,. Quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002; 29: 547-553.
11. [no authors listed]. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 193-205.
12. Cohen J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
13. Cohen J,. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159.
14. Aaron B, Kromrey JD, Ferron JM,. Equating r-Based and d-Based Effect-Size Indices: Problems With a Commonly Recommended Formula. Presented at: Florida Educational Research Association; November 2-4, 1998; Orlando, Florida.
15. Schain WS, Wellisch DK, Pasnau RO, Landsverk J,. The sooner the better: a study of psychological factors in woman undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. Am J Psychiatry. 1985; 142: 40-46.
16. Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP,. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983; 1: 459-462.
17. Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL,. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 46-54.
18. Pusic A, Thompson TA, Kerrigan CL, et al. Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 1325-1333.
19. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA,. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 769-776.
20. Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG,. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 7-12.
21. Cederna PS, Yates WR, Chang P, Cram AE, Ricciardelli EJ,. Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 35: 458-468.
22. Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M,. Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1142-1153. (Pubitemid 32280465)
23. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA,. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 757-767.
24. Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM, Newman MI, Hughes DB,. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 359-365.
25. Spear SL, Onyewu C,. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 930-942.
26. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 49: 713-721.
27. Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger BA, Rogers K, Messina P, Gayle LB,. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52: 465-470; discussion 470.
28. Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K,. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 877-881. (Pubitemid 39195747)
29. Olsen MA, Lefta M, Dietz JR, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 326-335.
30. Jhaveri JD, Rush SC, Kostroff K, et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72: 859-865.
31. Gui GP, Kadayaprath G, Tan SM, et al. Long-term quality-of-life assessment following one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional expander implants: the patient's perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 17-24.
32. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Nos C, Falcou MC,. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1702-1709.