Patterns of use and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction among obese patients: Results from a population-based study

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 263-270

  Kulkarni, Anita R ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Katz, Steven ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Hamilton, Ann S ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Graff, John J ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Alderman, Amy K ^a,b,c,d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Department of Surgery ^*

^c Section of Plastic Surgery   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LOS ANGELES; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 84864963746     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182589af7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010;303:235-241.
2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549-1555.
3. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. Pooled analysis ofprospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am JEpidemiol. 2000;152:514-527.
4. Aderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complica-tions in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year re-sults of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265-2274.
5. Greco JA III, Castaldo ET, Nanney LB, et al. Autologous breast reconstruction: The Vanderbilt experience (1998 to 2005) ofindependent predictors ofdispleasing outcomes. JAm Coll Surg. 2008;207:49-56.
6. Mc Carthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, et al. Predicting com-plications following expander/implant breast reconstruc-tion: An outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1886-1892.
7. Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84:886-892.
8. Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Taylor N. Effect ofobesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:788-795.
9. Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1954-1960; discussion 1961-1962.
10. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap forbreast reconstruc-tion in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:447-457.
11. Atisha DM,Alderman AK, Kuhn LE,Wilkins EG. Theimpact of obesity on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1893-1899.
12. Kulkarni AR, Atisha DM, Alderman AK, Wilkins EG The effect of obesity on post-operative body image in women undergoing breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122:162-163.
13. Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Correlates ofbreast reconstruction: Results from a population-based study. Can-cer 2005;104:2340-2346.
14. Dillman D. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley; 1978.
15. Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Zemencuk JK. Correlates ofsurgical treat-ment type for women with noninvasive and invasive breast cancer. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:659-670.
16. Katz SJ, Lantz PM,Janz NK, et al. Patterns and correlates of local therapyforwomenwith ductal carcinoma-in-situ.J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3001-3007.
17. Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, et al. Patient satisfac- tionwithhealthcare decisions: The satisfactionwith decision scale. Med Decis Making 1996;16:58-64.
18. Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making2003;23:281-292.
19. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124:345-353.
20. Puhl R Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:788-805.
21. Beahm EK, Walton RL, Chang DW. Breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:15-16.
22. Brodie DA, Slade PD. The relationship between body-image and body-fat in adult women. Psychol Med. 1988;18:623-631.
23. Legenbauer T, Vocks S, Betz S, et al. Differences in the nature of body image disturbances between female obese individuals with versus without a comorbid binge eating dis-order: An exploratory study including static and dynamic aspects ofbodyimage. Behav Modif. 2011;35:162-186.
24. Street RL Jr, Voigt B. Patient participation in decidingbreast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making 1997;17:298-306.
25. Moyer A, Salovey P. Patient participation in treatment deci-sion making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery. Womens Health 1998;4:103-116.
26. Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Aderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: Do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options?J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1067-1073.