Interactions of hybridization and mating systems: A case study in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1002-1013

  Goodwillie, Carol ^a   Ness, Jennifer M ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DAKOTA CONSULTING INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybridization; Leptosiphon; Polemoniaceae; Reproductive isolation; Self incompatibility; Selfing; SI SC rule

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; MATING SUCCESS; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; LEPTOSIPHON; PHYSIOLOGY; POLEMONIACEAE; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY; SELFING; SI × SC RULE;

HYBRIDIZATION; LEPTOSIPHON; POLEMONIACEAE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY; SELFING; SI × SC RULE;

ANGIOSPERMS; GENETIC MARKERS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; POLEMONIACEAE;

EID: 84878889284     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200616     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Abbott, R. J., and A. J. Lowe. 2004. Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 467-474.
2. Anderson, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
3. Arnaud J. F., S. Fenart, M Cordellier and J. Cuguen. 2010. Populations of weedy crop-wild hybrid beets show contrasting variation in mating system and population genetic structure. Evolutionary Applications 3: 305-318.
4. Arnold, M. L., E. S. Ballerini and A. N. Brothers. 2012. Hybrid fit-ness, adaptation and evolutionary diversification: Lessons learned from Louisiana irises. Heredity 108: 159-166.
5. Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the out-crossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 358: 991-1004.
6. Barrett, S. C. H. 2010. Understanding plant reproductive diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 365: 99-109.
7. Becerra J. X., and D. G. Lloyd. 1992. Competition-dependent abscission of self-pollinated flowers of Phormium tenax (Agavaceae): A second action of self-incompatibility at the whole flower level? Evolution 46: 458-469.
8. Bedinger, P. A., R. T. Chetelat, B M cclure, L. C. Moyle, J. K. C. Rose, S. M. Stack E Van Der Knaap et al. 2011. Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: Opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation. Sexual Plant Reproduction 24: 171-187.
9. Bleeker, W. 2004. Genetic variation and self-incompatibility within and outside a Rorippa hybrid zone (Brassicaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 246: 35-44.
10. Bleeker, W. 2007. Interspecific hybridization in Rorippa (Brassicaceae): Patterns and processes. Systematics and Biodiversity 5: 311-319.
11. Brandvain Y and D Haig. 2005. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. American Naturalist 166: 330-338.
12. Buerkle, C. 2005. Maximum-likelihood estimation of a hybrid index based on molecular markers. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 684-687.
13. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2: 8-13.
14. Campbell, D. R. 2004. Natural selection in Ipomopsis hybrid zones: Implications for ecological speciation. New Phytologist 161: 83-90.
15. Charlesworth D., and B Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-268.
16. Conner J. K., and S R ush. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105: 509-516.
17. Covey, P.A., K. Kondo, L Welch, E Frank, S Sianta, A Kumar, R Nuñez et al. 2010. Multiple features that distinguish unilateral incongruity and self-incompatibility in the tomato clade. Plant Journal 64: 367-378.
18. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
19. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
20. Cruden, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: A conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46.
21. Darwin, C. R. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London, UK.
22. DeMauro, M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conservation Biology 7: 542-550.
23. de Nettancourt, D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
24. Diaz, A., and M. R. Macnair. 1999. Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytologist 144: 471-478.
25. Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
26. Doyle J. J., and J L Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
27. Eckert, C. G., K. E. Samis and S Dart. 2006. Reproductive assurance and the evolution of uniparental reproduction in flowering plants. In L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett [eds.], Ecology and evolution of flowers, 183-203. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
28. Ellstrand, N. C., R. Whitkus and L. H. Rieseberg. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 5090-5093.
29. Ferguson, C. J., D. A. Levin and R. K. Jansen. 1999. Natural hybridization between an outcrossing and a selfing Phlox (Polemoniaceae): The maternal species of F 1 hybrids. Plant Systematics and Evolution 218: 153-158.
30. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11: 53-63.
31. Fishman L and J. H. Willis. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55: 1932-1942.
32. Fishman L and R W yat t. 1999. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53: 1723-1733.
33. Foxe, J. P., T. Slotte, E. A. Stahl B N euffer H H urka and S. I. W right. 2009. Recent speciation associated with the evolution of selfing in Capsella. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 5241-5245.
34. Goodwillie, C. 1997. The genetic control of self-incompatibility in Linanthus parviflorus (Polemoniaceae). Heredity 79: 424-432.
35. Goodwillie, C. 1999. Multiple origins of self-compatibility in Linanthus section Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): Phylogenetic evidence from internal-transcribed-spacer sequence data. Evolution 53: 1387-1395.
36. Goodwillie, C. 2000. Inbreeding depression and mating systems in two species of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae). Heredity 84: 283-293.
37. Goodwillie C, S K alisz and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 47-79.
38. Goodwillie C and M C Knight. 2006. Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: A comparison of three populations. Annals of Botany 98: 351-360.
39. Goodwillie C and J. M. Ness. 2005. Correlated evolution in floral morphology and the timing of self-compatibility in Leptosiphon jep-sonii (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 741-751.
40. Goodwillie, C., K. L. Partis and J W West. 2004. Transient self-incompatibility confers delayed selfing in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 387-394.
41. Goodwillie, C., R. D. Sargent, C. G. Eckert E E lle, M. A. Geber, M. O. Johnston S K alisz et al. 2010. Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation. New Phytologist 185: 311-321.
42. Grant, V. 1966. Selective origin of incompatibility barriers in the plant genus Gilia. American Naturalist 100: 99-118.
43. Grant, V. 1994. Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 3-10.
44. Grant V and K. A. Grant. 1965. Flower pollination in the phlox family. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
45. Harder, L. D., M. B. Cruzan and J. D. Thomson. 1993. Unilateral incompatibility and the effects of interspecific pollination for Erythronium americanum and Erythronium albidum (Liliaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 353-358.
46. Hiscock, S. J., and H. G. Dickinson. 1993. Unilateral incompatibility within the Brassicaceae: Further evidence for the involvement of the self-incompatibility (S)-locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 744-753.
47. James, J. K., and R. J. Abbott. 2005. Recent, allopatric, homoploid hybrid speciation: The origin of Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae) in the British Isles from a hybrid zone on Mount Etna, Sicily. Evolution 59: 2533-2547.
48. Kariyat, R. R., J. P. Sinclair, and E. M. Golenberg. 2013. Following Darwin's trail: Interactions affecting the evolution of plant mating systems. American Journal of Botany 100: 999-1001.
49. Kay, K. 2006. Reproductive isolation between two closely related hummingbird-pollinated neotropical gingers. Evolution 60: 538-552.
50. Kay K and D W Schemske. 2008. Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution 6 2: 2628-2642.
51. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado, USA.
52. Kelly J. K., A. Rasch and S. Kalisz. 2002. A method to estimate pollen viability from pollen size variation. American Journal of Botany 89: 1021-1023.
53. Koelling, V. A., and R M auricio. 2010. Genetic factors associated with mating system cause a partial reproductive barrier between two para-patric species of Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 97: 412-422.
54. Les, D. H., J. A. Reinartz and E. J. Esselman. 1991. Genetic consequences of rarity in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae), a threatened, self-incompatible plant. Evolution 45: 1641-1650.
55. Levin, D. A. 1967. Hybridization between annual species of Phlox: Population structure. American Journal of Botany 54: 1122-1130.
56. Levin, D. A. 2012. The long wait for hybrid sterility in flowering plants. New Phytologist 196: 666-670.
57. Lewis D and L. K. Crowe. 1958. Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233-256.
58. Li W and R. T. Chetelat. 2010. A pollen factor linking inter- and in-traspecific pollen rejection in tomato. Science 330: 1827-1830.
59. Lloyd, D. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-79.
60. Martin, F. W. 1958. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34: 125-128.
61. Martin, N. H., and J H Willis. 2007. Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61: 68-82.
62. Murfett J T, J S trabala, D. M. Zurek, B Mou, B Beecher and B. A. McClure. 1996. S-RNase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: Multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species. Plant Cell 8: 943-958.
63. Nagy, E. 1997. Frequency-dependent seed production and hybridization rates: Implications for gene flow between locally adapted plant populations. Evolution 51: 703-714.
64. Ness, J. M. 2007. The interacting effects of hybridization and breeding systems in two species of Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae). Masters thesis, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
65. Onus A. N., and B Pickersgill. 2004. Unilateral incompatibility in Capsicum (Solanaceae): Occurrence and taxonomic distribution. Annals of Botany 94: 289-295.
66. Ornduff, R. 1969. Reproductive biology in relatoin to systematics. Taxon 18: 121-133.
67. Peakall R and P. E. Smouse. 2006. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
68. Perret M A, Chautems R, S pichiger, T.G. Barraclough and V S avolainen. 2007. The geographical pattern of speciation and floral diversification in the neotropics: The tribe Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae) as a case study. Evolution 61: 1641-1660.
69. Pettengill, J. B., and D. A. Moeller. 2012. Tempo and mode of mating system evolution between incipient Clarkia species. Evolution 66: 1210-1225.
70. Pires, J.C., K.Y. Lim, A Kovarik, R Matyasek, A Boyd, A.R. Leitch, I. J. Leitch et al. 2004. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of recently evolved Tragopogon (Asteraceae) allopolyploids reveal a karyotype that is additive of the diploid progenitors. American Journal of Botany 91: 1022-1035.
71. Ramsey J, H Bradshaw and D Schemske. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57: 1520-1534.
72. Raven, P. 1976. Systematic botany and plant population biology. Systematic Botany 1: 284-316.
73. Rieseberg, L. H., and B K Blackman. 2010. Speciation genes in plants. Annals of Botany 106: 439-455.
74. Rieseberg L H, S Kim, R.A. Randell, K. D. Whitney, B. L. Gross, C. Lexer and K C lay. 2007. Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica 129: 149-165.
75. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. H. Willis. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317: 910-914.
76. Ruane, L. G. 2009. Mating system and the hybridization between self-compatible Phlox cuspidata and self-incompatible Phlox drummon-dii. Evolutionary Ecology 23: 791-805.
77. Ruhsam, M., P. M. Hollingsworth and R. A. Ennos. 2011. Early evolution in a hybrid swarm between outcrossing and selfing lineages in Geum. Heredity 107: 246-255.
78. Schemske, D. W., and C G oodwillie. 1996. Morphological and reproductive characteristics of Linanthus jepsonii (Polemoniaceae), a newly described, geographically restricted species from northern California. Madroño 43: 453-463.
79. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
80. Sobel, J. M., G. F. Chen, L. R. Watt and D W S chemske. 2010. The biology of speciation. Evolution 64: 295-315.
81. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
82. Tang, C. L., C. Toomajian, S S herman-Broyles, V P lagnol, Y L Guo, T. T. Hu, R M C lark et al. 2007. The evolution of selfing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317: 1070-1071.
83. Tiffin, P., M. S. Olson and L. C. Moyle. 2001. Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 268: 861-867.
84. PR Hogers, M Bleeker, M Reijans, T van de Lee, M Hornes, A Frijters, J Pot, J Peleman, M Kuiper and M Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 4407-4414.
85. Weber, J. J., and C Goodwillie. 2009. Evolution of the mating system in a partially self-incompatible species: Reproductive assurance and pollen limitation in populations that differ in the timing of self-compatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 885-893.