Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric mimulus species

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 68-82

  Martin, Noland H ^a   Willis, John H ^b  

^a Texas State University   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Flowering phenology; Introgression; Natural hybridization; Phrymaceae; Reproductive asynchrony; Scrophulariaceae; Speciation

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; FLOWERING; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; PHENOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEED PRODUCTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FLOWER; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MIMULUS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIFORNIA; DEMOGRAPHY; FLOWERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MIMULUS; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

MIMULUS (ANGIOSPERM); MIMULUS GUTTATUS; MIMULUS NASUTUS; PHRYMACEAE; SCROPHULARIACEAE;

EID: 33947242909     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00006.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abbott, R. J., and A. J. Lowe. 2004. Origins, establishment, and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82:467-474.
2. Arathi, H. S., A. Rasch, C. Cox, and J. K. Kelly. 2002. Autogamy and floral longevity in Mimulus guttatus. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:567-573.
3. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
4. Arnold, M. L. 2006. Evolution through genetic exchange. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
5. Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 1995, Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 67-71.
6. Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 2005. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Tr. Ecol. Evol. 10:67-71.
7. Borchsenius, F. 2002. Staggered flowering in four sympatric varieties of Geonoma cuneata (Palmae). Biotropica 34:603-606.
8. Burgess, K. S., M. Morgan, L. Deverno, and B. C. Husband. 2005. Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Mol. Ecol. 14:3471-3483.
9. Chari, J., and P. Wilson. 2001. Factors limiting hybridization between Penstemon spectabilis and P. contranthifolius. Can. J. Bot. 79:1439-1448.
10. Coyne, J. A. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355:511-515.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
12. -. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
13. -. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
14. Cruden, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding system in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32-46.
15. Cruzan, M. B., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1993. Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47:925-934.
16. Diaz, A., and M. R. MacNair. 1998. The effect of plant size on the expression of cleistogamy in Mimulus nasutus. Func. Ecol. 12:92-98.
17. -. 1999. Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol. 144:471-478.
18. Dobzhansky, T. H. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
19. Dole, J. A., and K. Ritland. 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47:361-373.
20. Dudash, M. R., and K. Ritland. 1991. Multiple paternity and self-fertilization in relation to floral age in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78:1746-1753.
21. Fenster, C. B., and D. E. Carr. 1997. Genetics of sex allocation in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 10:641-661.
22. Fenster, C. B., P. K. Diggle, S. C. H. Barrett, and K. Ritland. 1995. The genetics of floral development differentiating two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Heredity 74:258-266.
23. Fishman, L., and D. A. Stratton. 2004. The genetics of floral divergence and postzygotic barriers between outcrossing and selfing populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 58:296-307.
24. Fishman, L., and J. H. Willis. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55:1932-1942.
25. -. 2006. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 60:1372-1381.
26. Fishman, L., J. A. Kelly, and J. H. Willis. 2002. Minor quantitative trait loci underlie floral traits associated with mating system divergence in Mimulus. Evolution 56:2138-2155.
27. Gardner, M., and M. MacNair. 2000. Factors affecting the co-existence of the serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus Curran and its presumed progenitor, Mimulus guttatus Fischer ex DC. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69:443-459.
28. Goodwillie, C. 1999. Multiple origins of self-compatibility in Linanthus section Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): phylogenetic evidence from internal-transcribed-spacer sequence data. Evolution 53:1387-1395.
29. Grant, A. L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gar. 11:99-389.
30. Hurt, C. R., M. Farzin, and P. W. Hedrick. 2005. Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered Sonoran Topminnow. Genetics 171:655-662.
31. Husband, B. C., and H. A. Sabara. 2004. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytol. 161:703-713.
32. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 2000. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. J. Ecol. 88:689-701.
33. Kay, K. M. 2006. Reproductive isolation between two closely related hummingbird-pollinated neotropical gingers. Evolution 60:538-552.
34. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inoue. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot.
35. Kelly, A. J., and J. H. Willis. 1998. Polymorphic microsatellite loci in Mimulus guttatus and related species. Mol. Ecol. 7:769-774.
36. Kiang, Y. T. 1973. Floral structure, hybridization and evolutionary relationship of two species of Mimulus. Rhodora 75:225-238.
37. Kiang, Y. T., and J. L. Hamrick. 1978. Reproductive isolation in the Mimulus guttatus-M. nasutus complex. Am. Midl. Nat. 100:269-276.
38. Koeniger, N., and G. Koeniger. 2000. Reproductive isolation among species of the genus Apis. Apidologie 31:313-339.
39. Kohn, J. R., S. W. Graham, B. Morton, J. J. Doyle, and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontedericaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:1454-1469.
40. Lamont, B. B., T. He, N. J. Enright, S. L. Krauss, and B. P. Miller. 2003. Anthropogenic disturbance promotes hybridization between Banksia species by altering their biology. J. Evol. Biol. 16:551-557.
41. Latta, R., and K. Ritland. 1994. The relationship between inbreeding depression and prior inbreeding among populations of four Mimulus taxa. Evolution 48:806-817.
42. Martin, N. H. 2004a. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus. (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6:777-782.
43. -. 2004b. Evolution, genetics, and maintenance of reproductive isolation in Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Duke University, Durham, NC.
44. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
45. -. 1947. Ecological factors in speciation. Evolution 1:263-288.
46. -. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. McIntosh, M. E. 2002. Flowering phenology and reproductive output in two sister species of Ferocactus (Cactaceae). Plant Ecol. 159:1-13.
48. Nosil, P., T. H. Vines, and D. J. Funk. 2006. Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants using divergent environments. Evolution 59:705-719.
49. Petit, C., P. Lesbros, X. Ge, and J. D. Thompson. 1997. Variation in flowering phenology and selfing rate across a contact zone between diploid and tetraploid Arrhenatherum elatius (Poaceae). Heredity 79:31-40.
50. Quinn, T. P., M. J. Unwin, and M. T. Kinnison. 2000. Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding by introduced Chinook salmon populations. Evolution 54:1372-1385.
51. Ramsey, J., H. D. Bradshaw, and D. W. Schemske. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520-1534.
52. Ritland, K. 1989. Correlated matings in the partial selfer, Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 43:848-859.
53. -. 1990. Inferences about inbreeding depression based on changes of the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 44:1230-1241.
54. Ritland, K., and F.R. Ganders. 1987. Covariation of selfing rates with parental gene fixation indices within populations of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 41:760-771
55. Ritland, K., and M. Leblanc. 2004. Mating system of four inbreeding monkeyflower (Mimulus) species revealed using 'progeny-pair' analysis of highly informative microsatellite markers. Plant Sp. Biol. 19:149-157.
56. Schemske, D. W. 2000. Understanding the origin of species. Evolution 54:1069-1073.
57. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372-380.
58. Schoen, D. J., M. O. Johnston, A. -M. L'Heureux, and J. V. Marsolais. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51:1090-1099.
59. Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:393-430.
60. -. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787-792.
61. Sweigart, A., K. Karoly, A. Jones, and J. H. Willis. 1999. The distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients and pairwise relatedness in a population of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83:625-632.
62. Sweigart, A. L., and J. H. Willis. 2003. Patterns of nucleotide diversity in two species of Mimulus are affected by mating system and asymmetric introgression. Evolution 57:2490-2506.
63. Sweigart A. L., L. Fishman, and J. H. Willis. 2006. A simple genetics incompatibility causes hybrid male sterility in Mimulus. Genetics 172:2465-2479.
64. Sweigart, A. L., A. R. Mason, and J. H. Willis. 2007. Natural variation for a hybrid incompatibility between two species of Mimulus. Evolution 60: In Press.
65. Ushimaru, A., and K. Nakata. 2002. The evolution of flower allometry in selfing species. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4:1217-1227.
66. Vickery, R. K., Jr. 1956. Data on interracial and interspecific hybridizations in the section Simiolus of the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Utah Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 33:45-64.
67. -. 1964. Barriers to gene exchange between members of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 18:52-69.
68. -. 1973. Crossing barriers in the yellow monkey flowers of the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Genet. Lect. 3:33-82.
69. -. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol. Biol. 11:405-507.
70. Wendt, T., M. B. F. Canela, D. E. Klein, and R. I. Rios. 2002. Selfing facilitates reproductive isolation among three sympatric species of Pitcairnia (Bromeliaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 232:201-212.
71. Whiteman, H. H., and R. D. Semlitsch. 2005. Asymmetric reproductive isolation among polymorphic salamanders. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 86:265-281.
72. Willis, J. H. 1993. Partial self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 71:145-154.