A pollen factor linking inter-and intraspecific pollen rejection in tomato

Science

Volumn 330, Issue 6012, 2010, Pages 1827-1830

  Li, Wentao ^a   Chetelat, Roger T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULLIN; CULLIN1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DICOTYLEDON; FRUIT; HYBRIDIZATION; POLLEN; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CULTIVATED SPECIES; DNA POLYMORPHISM; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; INBREEDING; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC RELATIONSHIP; INTRASPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; LOSS OF FUNCTION MUTATION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PETUNIA; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SOLANUM; TOMATO;

ALLELES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BASE SEQUENCE; CROSSES, GENETIC; CULLIN PROTEINS; FLOWERS; GENES, PLANT; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INTRONS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; POLLEN; POLLINATION; RIBONUCLEASES; RNA, MESSENGER; RNA, PLANT; SEQUENCE DELETION; SOLANUM;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PETUNIA; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM;

EID: 78650636361     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1197908     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. B. A. McClure, J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1069 (2009).
2. B. A. McClure et al., Nature 342, 955 (1989).
3. P. Sijacic et al., Nature 429, 302 (2004).
4. D. Lewis, L. K. Crowe, Heredity 12, 233 (1958).
5. R. T. Chetelat, J. W. DeVerna, Theor. Appl. Genet. 82, 704 (1991).
6. D. Bernacchi, S. D. Tanksley, Genetics 147, 861 (1997).
7. J. Murfett et al., Plant Cell 8, 943 (1996).
8. N. G. Hogenboom, Euphytica 22, 219 (1973).
9. J. J. Hardon, Genetics 57, 795 (1967).
10. B. E. Liedl, S. McCormick, M. A. Mutschler, Sex. Plant Reprod. 9, 299 (1996).
11. P. A. Covey et al., Plant J. 64, 367 (2010).
12. C. M. Rick, in Plant Evolutionary Biology, L. D. Gottlieb, S. K. Jain, Eds. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1988), pp. 133-147.
13. M. A. Mutschler, B. E. Liedl, in Genetic Control of Self-Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants, E. G. Williams, A. C. Clarke, R. B. Knox, Eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1994), pp. 164-188.
14. C. M. Rick, J. W. De Verna, R. T. Chetelat, M. A. Stevens, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 3580 (1986).
15. W. Li, S. Royer, R. T. Chetelat, Genetics 185, 1069 (2010).
16. Z. Hua, T. H. Kao, Plant Cell 18, 2531 (2006).
17. L. Zhao et al., Plant J. 62, 52 (2010).
18. C. Cenciarelli et al., Curr. Biol. 9, 1177 (1999).
19. D. Twell, J. Yamaguchi, S. McCormick, Development 109, 705 (1990).
20. C. M. Rick, J. F. Fobes, M. Holle, Plant Syst. Evol. 127, 139 (1977).
21. N. Zheng et al., Nature 416, 703 (2002).
22. H. Qiao et al., Plant Cell 16, 582 (2004).
23. K. Kubo et al., Science 330, 796 (2010).
24. J. Royo et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6511 (1994).
25. A. W. van Heusden et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 1068 (1999).
26. T. M. Fulton, R. Van der Hoeven, N. T. Eannetta, S. D. Tanksley, Plant Cell 14, 1457 (2002).
27. C. M. Rick, in Solanaceae Biology and Systematics, W. G. D'Arcy, Ed. (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1986), pp. 475-495.
28. J. Y. Ho et al., Plant J. 2, 971 (1992).
29. A. J. Monforte, S. D. Tanksley, Genome 43, 803 (2000).
30. M. A. Canady, V. Meglic, R. T. Chetelat, Genome 48, 685 (2005).
31. We thank J. DeVerna, P. March, K. Smith, and the C. M. Rick Tomato Genetics Resource Center (TGRC) staff for providing seed or cuttings of key genotypes; P. March for photos of fruit; B. McClure and P. Bedinger for comments on the manuscript; and S. Tanksley for providing seed of S. habrochaites introgression lines. Supported by NSF grant DBI 0605200. Sequence data have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HQ610200 and HQ610201. Seed requests submitted to the TGRC are subject to a material transfer agreement (http://tgrc.ucdavis.edu/MTA/TGRC-MTA.pdf).