Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation

New Phytologist

Volumn 185, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 311-321

  Goodwillie, Carol ^a   Sargent, Risa D ^b   Eckert, Christopher G ^c   Elle, Elizabeth ^d   Geber, Monica A ^e   Johnston, Mark O ^f   Kalisz, Susan ^g   Moeller, David A ^h   Ree, Richard H ⁱ   Vallejo Marin, Mario ^j   Winn, Alice A ^k  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^f DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

ⁱ FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^k FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Floral display; Flower size; Mating system evolution; Resource allocation; Sex allocation; Trade off

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; AUTOGAMY; DATABASE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; PHYLOGENETICS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX ALLOCATION; TRADE-OFF;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION;

ANGIOSPERMS; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 71249132000     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03043.x     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aide TM. 1986. The influence of wind and animal pollination on variation in outcrossing rates. Evolution 40 : 434 435.
2. Allard RW, Jain SK, Workman P. 1968. The genetics of inbreeding populations. Advances in Genetics 14 : 55 131.
3. Armbruster WS, Mulder CPH, Baldwin BG, Kalisz S, Wessa B, Nute H. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in Tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae SL). American Journal of Botany 89 : 37 49.
4. Baker HG. 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24 : 177 191.
5. Barrett SCH, Eckert CG. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In : Kawano S, ed. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. London, UK : Academic Press, 229 254.
6. Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Worley AC. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 351 : 1271 1280.
7. Bawa KS, Webb CJ. 1984. Flower, fruit and seed abortion in tropical forest trees: implications for the evolution of paternal and maternal reproductive patterns. American Journal of Botany 71 : 736 751.
8. Belaoussoff S, Shore JS. 1995. Floral correlates and fitness consequences of mating system variation in Turnera ulmifolia. Evolution 49 : 545 556.
9. Bell G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 224 : 223 265.
10. Bertin RI, Newman CM. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Botanical Review 59 : 112 159.
11. Brown AHD. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theoretical Population Biology 15 : 1 42.
12. Brunet J. 1992. Sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7 : 79 84.
13. Brunet J, Eckert CG. 1998. Effects of floral morphology and display on outcrossing in Blue Columbine, Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Functional Ecology 12 : 596 606.
14. Brunet J, Sweet HR. 2006. Impact of insect pollinator group and floral display size on outcrossing rate. Evolution 60 : 234 246.
15. Caruso CM. 2006. Adaptive evolution: the ecological genetics of floral traits. Heredity 97 : 86 87.
16. Charlesworth D. 1989. Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource-allocation and genetic load. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4 : 289 292.
17. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female function in hermaphrodites. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 15 : 57 74.
18. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. Evolution 41 : 948 968.
19. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1995. Quantitative genetics in plants: the effect of the breeding system on genetic variability. Evolution 49 : 911 920.
20. Charlesworth D, Morgan MT. 1991. Allocation of resources to sex functions in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 332 : 91 102.
21. Charnov EL. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, NJ, USA : Princeton University Press.
22. Conner JK, Rush S. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105 : 509 516.
23. Cruden RW. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31 : 32 46.
24. Cruden RW, Lyon DL. 1985. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems. Oecologia 66 : 299 306.
25. Darwin CH. 1876. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. London, UK : John Murray.
26. Davies TJ, Barraclough TG, Chase MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101 : 1904 1909.
27. Dejong G. 1993. Covariances between traits deriving from successive allocations of a resource. Functional Ecology 7 : 75 83.
28. Dejong TJ, Waser NM, Klinkhamer PGL. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8 : 321 325.
29. Delaguerie P, Olivieri I, Atlan A, Gouyon PH. 1991. Analytic and simulation-models predicting positive genetic correlations between traits linked by trade-offs. Evolutionary Ecology 5 : 361 369.
30. Eckhart VM. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 5 : 370 384.
31. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35 : 375 403.
32. Garland T, Harvey PH, Ives IR. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41 : 18 32.
33. Gleason HA, Cronquist A. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Bronx, NY, USA : New York Botanical Garden.
34. Glover DE, Barrett SCH. 1986. Variation in the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng) Solms (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 40 : 1122 1131.
35. Goodwillie C. 1999. Multiple origins of self-compatibility in Linanthus section Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): phylogenetic evidence from internal-transcribed-spacer sequence data. Evolution 53 : 1387 1395.
36. Goodwillie C. 2000. Inbreeding depression and mating systems in two species of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae). Heredity 84 : 283 293.
37. Goodwillie C, Ness J. 2005. Correlated evolution in floral morphology and the timing of self-compatibility in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 166 : 741 751.
38. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert C. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36 : 47 79.
39. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1995. Mating costs of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373 : 512 515.
40. Harder LD, Cruzan MB. 1990. An evaluation of the physiological and evolutionary influences of inflorescence size and flower depth on nectar production. Functional Ecology 4 : 559 572.
41. Harder LD, Johnson SD. 2005. Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272 : 2651 2657.
42. Harder LD, Jordan CY, Gross WE, Routley MB. 2004. Beyond floricentrism: the pollination function of inflorescences. Plant Species Biology 19 : 137 148.
43. Igic B, Kohn JR. 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60 : 1098 1103.
44. Johnston MO, Schoen DJ. 1996. Correlated evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression: an experimental study of nine populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 50 : 1478 1491.
45. Kennedy BF, Elle E. 2008. The reproductive assurance benefit of selfing: importance of flower size and population size. Oecologia 155 : 469 477.
46. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39 : 24 40. (Pubitemid 16276773)
47. Lloyd DG. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions of the Gray Herbarium Harvard University 195 : 3 134.
48. Lloyd DG. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113 : 67 79.
49. Lloyd DG. 1987. Allocations to pollen, seeds and pollination mechanisms in self-fertilizing plants. Functional Ecology 1 : 83 89.
50. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15 : 65 95.
51. Lyons EE, Antonovics J. 1991. Breeding system evolution in Leavenworthia: breeding system variation and reproductive success in natural populations of Leavenworthia crassa (Cruciferae). American Journal of Botany 78 : 270 287.
52. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2009. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6. http://mesquiteproject.org
53. Midford PE, Garland T, Maddison WP. 2008. PDAP Package of Mesquite. Version 1.14. http://mesquiteproject.org/pdap-mesquite/
54. Muller H. 1883. The fertilization of flowers. London, UK : MacMillan.
55. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20 : 289 290.
56. Parker IM, Nakamura RR, Schemske DW. 1995. Reproductive allocation and the fitness consequences of selfing in two sympatric species of Epilobium (Onagraceae) with contrasting mating systems. American Journal of Botany 82 : 1007 1016.
57. Primack RB. 1985. Longevity of individual flowers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16 : 15 37.
58. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria : R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
59. Ritland C, Ritland K. 1989. Variation of sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 76 : 1731 1739.
60. Routley MB, Husband BC. 2003. The effect of protandry on siring success in Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). Evolution 57 : 240 248.
61. Sakai S, Harada Y. 2001. Sink-limitation and the size-number trade-off of organs: production of organs using a fixed amount of reserves. Evolution 55 : 467 476.
62. Sargent RD, Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Ree RA. 2007. Phylogenetic evidence for a flower size and number trade-off. American Journal of Botany 94 : 2059 2062.
63. Sato H. 2002. The role of autonomous self-pollination in floral longevity in varieties of Impatiens hypophylla (Balsaminaceae). American Journal of Botany 89 : 263 269.
64. Schemske DW, Lande R. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 2. Empirical observations. Evolution 39 : 41 52.
65. Schemske DW, Lande R. 1986. Mode of pollination and selection on mating system: a comment on Aide's paper. Evolution 40 : 436 436.
66. Schemske DW, Lande R. 1987. On the evolution of plant mating systems: a reply to Waller. American Naturalist 130 : 804 806.
67. Schoen DJ, Ashman TL. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49 : 131 139.
68. Sutherland S. 1986. Floral sex-ratios, fruit-set, and resource allocation in plants. Ecology 67 : 991 1001.
69. Takebayashi N, Morrell PL. 2001. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. American Journal of Botany 88 : 1143 1150.
70. Tomimatsu H, Ohara M. 2006. Evolution of hierarchical floral resource allocation associated with mating system in an animal-pollinated hermaphroditic herb, Trillium camschatcense (Trilliaceae). American Journal of Botany 93 : 134 141.
71. Vallejo-Marin M, Barrett SCH. 2009. Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. Annals of Botany 103 : 951 962.
72. Vogler DW, Kalisz S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55 : 202 204.
73. Waller DM. 1986. Is there disruptive selection for self-fertilization. American Naturalist 128 : 421 426.
74. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. 2008. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24 : 2098 2100. http://phylodiversity.net/phylocom
75. Weber JJ, Goodwillie C. 2007. Timing of self-compatibility, flower longevity, and potential for male outcross success in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 94 : 1338 1343.
76. Willson MF, Price PW. 1977. The evolution of inflorescence size in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31 : 495 511.
77. Worley AC, Barrett SCH. 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54 : 1533 1545.
78. Worley AC, Baker AM, Thompson JD, Barrett SCH. 2000. Floral display in Narcissus: variation in flower size and number at the species, population, and individual levels. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 : 69 79.
79. Worley AC, Houle D, Barrett SCH. 2003. Consequences of hierarchical allocation for the evolution of life-history traits. American Naturalist 161 : 153 167.
80. Wyatt R. 1984. The evolution of self-pollination in granite outcrop species of Arenaria (Caryophyllaceae). 1. Morphological correlates. Evolution 38 : 804 816. (Pubitemid 16276912)