Multiple origins of self-compatibility in Linanthus section Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): Phylogenetic evidence from internal-transcribed-spacer sequence data

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1387-1395

  Goodwillie, Carol ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Character evolution; Convergence; Linanthus; Polemoniaceae; Self incompatibility; Selfing

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

EMBRYOPHYTA; LINANTHUS; LINANTHUS BICOLOR; POLEMONIACEAE;

EID: 0032721017     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05403.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Armbruster, W. S. 1991. Phylogeny and the evolution of plant-animal interactions. BioScience 42:12-20.
2. Baker, H. G. 1959. Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 24:177-190.
3. Baldwin, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 1:3-16.
4. Barrett, S. C. H., L. D. Harder, and A. C. Worley. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351:1271-1280.
5. Bell, C. D. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae). M.Sc. thesis, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
6. Buxton, E. G. 1994. Linanthus latisectus (Polemoniaceae), a newly described species from the California North Coast Ranges. Madrono 41:178-184.
7. Charlesworth, D. 1985. Distribution of dioecy and self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Pp. 237-268 in P. J. Greenwood, and M. Slatkin, eds. Evolution: essays in honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
8. _. 1988. Evolution of homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 60:445-453.
9. Cruden, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32-46.
10. de Nettancourt, D. 1977. Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics 3. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
11. Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43:1137-1156.
12. Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP: phylogenetic inference package. Vers. 3.2. Cladistics 5:164-165.
14. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11:53-63.
15. Goodwillie, C. 1997a. The genetic control of self-incompatibility in Linanthus parviflorus (Polemoniaceae). Heredity 79:424-432.
16. _. 1997b. Self-incompatibility and mating system evolution in Linanthus section Leptosiphon. Ph.D. diss., University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
17. Grant, V. 1959. Natural history of the Phlox family. Vol. 1. Systematic botany. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands.
18. _. 1998. Primary classification and phylogeny of the Polemoniaceae, with comments on molecular cladistics. Am. J. Bot. 85:741-752.
19. Grant, V., and K. A. Grant. 1965. Flower pollination in the Phlox family. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
20. Higgens, D. G., A. J. Bleasby, and R. Fuchs. 1992. CLUSTAL. V. Improved software for multiple sequence alignment. CABIOS 8:189-191.
21. Hitchcock, C. L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the pacific northwest: an illustrated manual. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.
22. Hodges, S. A., and M. L. Arnold. 1995. Spurring plant diversification: Are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 262:343-348.
23. Holtsford, T. P., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1990. Inbreeding effects in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae) populations with different natural outcrossing rates. Evolution 44:231-246.
24. Husband, B., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1993. Multiple origins of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): inferences from style morph and isozyme variation. J. Evol. Biol. 6:591-608.
25. Johnson, L. A., J. L. Schultz, D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis. 1996. Monophyly and generic relationships of Polemoniaceae based on matK. sequences. Am. J. Bot. 83:1207-1224.
26. Johnston, M. O., and D. J. Schoen. 1996. Correlated evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression: an experimental study of nine populations of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 50:1478-1491.
27. Kim, S., D. J. Crawford, and R. K. Jansen. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of the subtribe Sonchinae (Asteraceae): evidence from ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 21:417-432.
28. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum-likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data and the branching order in Hominidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
29. Kohn, J. R., S. W. Graham, B. Morton, J. J. Doyle and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chlorophast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50:1454-1469.
30. Kuhner, M. K., and J. Felsenstein. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:459-468.
31. Lloyd, D. G. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility in racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herbarium Harv. Univ. 195:3-134.
32. _. 1980. Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms. Pp. 67-88 in O. T. Solbrig, ed. Demography and evolution in plant populations. Blackwell, Oxford.
33. Maddison, W., and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
34. Maddison, W. P., M. J. Donoghue, and D. R. Maddison. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 33:83-103.
35. Martin, F. W. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34:125-128.
36. Mason, H. L. 1948. Some additional notes on Polemoniaceae. Madrono 9:249-255.
37. McDade, L. A. 1991. Pollinator relationships, biogeography, and phylogenetics. BioScience 42:21-27.
38. Moore, D. M., and H. Lewis. 1965. The evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xaniiana. Evolution 19:104-114.
39. Ornduff, R. 1969. Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 18:121-133.
40. Patterson, R. 1993. Polemoniaceae. Pp. 824-852 in J. C. Hickman, ed. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
41. Porter, J. M. 1996. Phylogeny of Polemoniaceae based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer DNA sequences. Aliso 15:57-77.
42. Richards, A. J. 1997. Plant breeding systems. 2d ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
43. Schemske, D. W., and C. Goodwillie. 1996. Morphological and reproductive characteristics of Linanthus jepsonii (Polemoniaceae), a newly described, geographically restricted species from Northern California. Madrono 43:453-463.
44. Schoen, D. J. 1982. The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characterstics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36:352-360.
45. Schoen, D. J., M. O. Johnston, A. L'Heureux, and J. V. Marsolais. 1997. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51:1090-1099.
46. Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, S. G. Weller, A. K. Sakai, and W. L. Wagner. 1996. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Hawaiian endemics Schieden and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae). Syst. Bot. 21:365-379.
47. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
48. _. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in higher plants. Am. Nat. 41:337-354.
49. _. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP Vers. 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
51. Weller, S. G., M. J. Donoghue, and D. Charlesworth. 1995a. The evolution of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: a phylogenetic approach. Pp. 355-382 in P. C. Hoch and A. G. Stephenson, eds. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO.
52. Weller, S. G., W. L. Wagner, and A. K. Sakai. 1995b. A phylogenetic analysis of Schiedea and Alsinidendron (Caryophyllaceae: Alsinoideae): implications for the evolution of dioecy. Syst. Bot. 2:315-337.
53. Wendel, J. F., and J. J. Doyle. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Pp. 265-296 in P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, eds. Molecular systematics of plants. 2d ed. Chapman and Hall, New York.
54. White, T. J., T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in M. Innis, D. Gefand, J. Sninsky, and T. White, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and amplification. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
55. Wyatt, R. 1986. Ecology and evolution of self-pollination in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). J. Ecol. 74:403-418.
56. _. 1988. Phylogenetic aspects of evolution of self-pollination. Pp. 109-131 in L. D. Gottleib and S. K. Jain, eds. Plant evolutionary biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.