Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1061-1070

  Ashman, Tia Lynn ^a   Arceo Gómez, Gerardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Community assembly; Competition; Facilitation; Floral evolution; Heterospecific pollen receipt; Interspecific pollen transfer; Invasive species; Plant plant interactions; Pollinator sharing

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FITNESS; FLOWERING; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT COMMUNITY; POLLINATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY; COMPETITION; ECOSYSTEM; FACILITATION; FLORAL EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HETEROSPECIFIC POLLEN RECEIPT; INTERSPECIFIC POLLEN TRANSFER; INVASIVE SPECIES; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT-PLANT INTERACTIONS; POLLEN; POLLINATOR SHARING; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TIME;

COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY; COMPETITION; FACILITATION; FLORAL EVOLUTION; HETEROSPECIFIC POLLEN RECEIPT; INTERSPECIFIC POLLEN TRANSFER; INVASIVE SPECIES; PLANT-PLANT INTERACTIONS; POLLINATOR SHARING;

ANGIOSPERMS; ECOSYSTEM; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 84878879900     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200496     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Aguilar R., Ashworth L., Galetto L., and M A Aizen. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: Review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 9: 968-980.
2. Aizen, M. A., and D P Vázquez. 2006. Flowering phenologies of hummingbird plants from the temperate forest of southern South America: Is there evidence of competitive displacement? Ecography 29: 357-366.
3. Arceo-Gómez, G., and T.-L. Ashman. 2011. Heterospecific pollen deposition: Does diversity alter the consequences? New Phytologist 192: 738-746.
4. Armbruster, W. S., M. E. Edwards and E. M. Debevec. 1994. Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75: 315-329.
5. Bais H.P, Vepachedu R., Gilroy S., R. M. Callaway and J. M. V ivanco. 2003. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: From molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 301: 1377-1380.
6. Bartomeus I, J Bosch and M Vilà. 2008. High invasive pollen transfer, yet low deposition on native stigmas in a Carpobrotus-invaded community. Annals of Botany 102: 417-424.
7. Bascompte J and P J ordano. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38: 567-593.
8. Bascompte J, P Jordano, C J Melián and J. M. Olesen. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 9383-9387.
9. Bateson, W. 1909. Heredity and variation in modern lights. In A. C. Seward [ed], Darwin and modern science, 85-101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Bedinger P A., R T Chetelat, B McClure, L.C. Moyle, J.K. C. Rose, S. M. Stack E van der Knapp, et al. 2011. Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: Opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation. Sexual Plant Reproduction 24: 171-187.
11. Bell, J. M., J. D. Karron and R. J. Mitchell. 2005. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. Ecology 86: 762-771.
12. Bjerknes, A. L., Ø. Totland, S. J. Hegland and A Nielsen. 2007. Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biological Conservation 138: 1-12.
13. Brandvain Y and D Haig. 2005. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. American Naturalist 166: 330-338.
14. Brown, B. J., and R J Mitchell. 2001. Competition for pollination: Effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129: 43-49.
15. Callaway, R. N., and W. M. Ridenour. 2004. Novel weapons: Invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 436-443.
16. Campbell, D. R. 1985. Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellaria pubera: Competition for pollination. Ecology 66: 544-553.
17. Caruso, C. M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 1546-1557.
18. Covey, P. A., K. Kondo, L. Welch, E. Frank, S. Sianta, A. Kumar, R. Nuñez, et al 2010. Multiple features that distinguish unilateral incongruity and self-incompatibility in the tomato clade. Plant Journal 64: 367-378.
19. Dajoz I. I., T ill-Bottraud and P. H. Gouyon. 1991. Evolution of pollen morphology. Science 253: 66-68.
20. Dajoz I., I Till-Bottraud and P H Gouyon. 1993. Pollen aperature polymorphism and gametophyte performance in Viola diversifolia. Evolution 47: 1080-1093.
21. Da Silva, E. M., and R D Sargent. 2011. The effect of invasive Lythrum salicaria pollen deposition on seed set in the native species Decodon verticillatus. Botany 89: 141-146.
22. de Jager, M. L., L. L. Dreyer and A. G. Ellis. 2011. Do pollinators influence the assembly of flower colors within plant communities? Oecologia 166: 543-553.
23. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
24. Doyle, J. A., and C. L. Hotton. 1991. Diversification of early angio-sperm pollen in a cladistic context. In S. Blackmore and S. H. Barnes [eds.], Pollen and spores: Pattern of diversification, 165-195. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
25. Eaton, D. A. R., C. B. Fenster, J H ereford, S. Q. Huang and R. H. Ree. 2012. Floral diversity and community structure in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Ecology 93: S182-S194.
26. E dlund, A. F., R. Swanson and D P reuss. 2004. Pollen and stigma structure and function: The role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell 16: S84-S97.
27. Elle, E., S. L. Elwell and G. A. Gielens. 2012. The use of pollination networks in conservation. Botany 90: 525-534.
28. Elleman, C. J., V. Franklin-Tong and H. G. Dickinson. 1992. Pollination in species with dry stigmas: The nature of the early stigmatic response and the pathway taken by pollen tubes. New Phytologist 121: 413-424.
29. Fang Q and S.-Q. Huang. 2013. A directed network analysis of het-erospecific pollen transfer in a biodiverse community. Ecology doi:10.1890/12-1634.1.
30. Feinsinger, P., K. G. Murray, Kinsman S., and W. H. Busby. 1986. Floral neighborhood and pollination success in four hummingbird-pollinated cloud forest species. Ecology 67: 449-464.
31. F eldman, T., W. F. Morris and W G W ilson. 2004. When can two plant species facilitate each other's pollination? Oikos 105: 197-207.
32. Fishman L and R Wyatt. 1999. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53: 1723-1733.
33. Forrest, J., D. W. Inouye and J. D. Thomson. 2010. Flowering phenology in subalpine meadows: Does climate change variation influence community co-flowering patterns? Ecology 91: 431-440.
34. Furness, C. A., and P. J. Rudall. 2004. Pollen aperture evolution-A crucial factor for eudicot success? Trends in Plant Science 9: 154-158.
35. Galen C and T Gregory. 1989. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 81: 120-123.
36. Gao, X. Q., D. Zhu and X Zhang. 2010. Stigma factors regulating self-compatible pollination. Frontiers of Biology 5: 156-163.
37. Gardner M and M Macnair. 2000. Factors affecting the co-existence of the serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus Curran and its presumed progenitor, Mimulus guttatus Fischer ex DC. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 443-459.
38. Ghazoul, J. 2006. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. Journal of Ecology 94: 295-304.
39. Goodwillie C, S Kalisz and C G Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 47-79.
40. Goulson, D. 1994. A model to predict the influence of insect flower constancy on interspecific competition between insect pollinated plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 168: 309-314.
41. Haig, D. 2000. The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 9-32.
42. Harder, L. D., M. B. Cruzan and J. D. Thomson. 1993. Unilateral incompatibility and the effects of interspecific pollination for Erythronium americanum and Erythronium albidum (Liliaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 353-358.
43. Hedges, L. V., and I Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
44. Hegland, S. J., A. Nielsen, A Lázaro, A. L. Bjerknes and Ø Totland 2009. How does climate warming affect plant pollinator interactions? Ecology Letters 12: 184-195.
45. Herrera, C. M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: The spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35: 95-125.
46. Heslop-Harrison, J. 1975. Incompatibility and the pollen-stigma interaction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 26: 403-425.
47. Heslop-Harrison, J. 1979. Pollen walls as adaptive systems. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66: 813-829.
48. Heslop-Harrison, Y. 1981. Stigma characteristics and angiosperm taxonomy. Nordic Journal of Botany 1: 401-420.
49. Heslop-Harrison Y and K. R. Shivanna. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Annals of Botany 41: 1233-1258.
50. Hiscock S and H Dickinson. 1993. Unilateral incompatibility within the Brassicaceae: Further evidence for the involvement of the self-incompatibility (S)-locus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 8 6: 744-753.
51. Hiscock, S. J., and A. M. Allen. 2008. Diverse cell signaling pathways regulate pollen-stigma interactions: The search for consensus. New Phytologist 179: 286-317.
52. Hogenboom N and K Mather. 1975. Incompatibility and incongruity: Two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 188: 361-375.
53. Hopkins R and M. D. Rausher. 2012. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 335: 1090-1092.
54. Jennersten, O. 1988. Insect dispersal of fungal disease: Effects of Ustilago infection on pollinator attraction in Viscaria vulgaris. Oikos 51: 163-170.
55. Johnson, C. M., and D L Mulcahy. 1978. Male gametophyte in maize. II. Pollen vigor in inbred plants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 51: 211-215.
56. Kao, T., and T Tsukamoto. 2004. The molecular and genetic bases of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 16: S72-S83.
57. Kondoh M and M Higashi. 2000. Reproductive isolation mechanism resulting from resolution of intragenomic conflict. American Naturalist 156: 511-518.
58. Kwak, M. M., and O Jennersten. 1986. The significance of pollination time and frequency and of purity of pollen loads for seed set in Rhinanthus angustifolius (Scrophulariaceae) and Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oecologia 70: 502-507.
59. Kwak, M. M., and O J ennersten. 1991. Bumblebee visitation and seed-set in Melampyrum pratense and Viscaria vulgaris: Heterospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia 86: 99-104.
60. Lankinen Å and S K iboi. 2007. Pollen donor identity affects timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): A sexual conflict during pollen competition? American Naturalist 170: 854-863.
61. Lankinen Å and J. A. Madjidian. 2011. Enhancing pollen competition by delaying stigma receptivity: Pollen deposition schedules affect siring ability, paternal diversity and seed production in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: 1191-1200.
62. Lázaro A, R Lundgren and Ø Totland. 2009. Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos 118: 691-702.
63. Lee H, S S Huang, and T K ao. 1994. S proteins control rejection of incompatible pollen in Petunia inflata. Nature 367: 560-563.
64. Lewis D and L. K. Crowe. 1958. Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233-256.
65. Li W and R. T. Chetelat. 2010. A pollen factor linking inter-and in-traspecific pollen rejection in tomato. Science 330: 1827-1830.
66. Liedl B, S M cCormick, and M Mutschler. 1996. Unilateral incongruity in crosses involving Lycopersicon pennellii and L. esculentum is distinct from self-incompatibility in expression, timing and location. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9: 299-308.
67. Madjidian, J. A., S. Andersson and Å Lankinen. 2012. Estimation of heritability, evolvability and genetic correlations of two pollen and pistil traits involved in a sexual conflict over timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). Annals of Botany 110: 91-99.
68. Martin, F. W. 1970. Pollen germination on foreign stigmas. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 97: 1-6.
69. Matsumoto T K, I Takakura and T Nishida. 2010. Alien pollen grains interfere with the reproductive success of native congener. Biological Invasions 12: 1617-1626.
70. Mazer, S. J., A. A. Hove, B. S. Miller and M Barbet-Massin. 2010. The joint evolution of mating system and pollen performance: Predictions regarding male gametophytic evolution in selfers vs. outcrossers. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12: 31-41.
71. McClure B., F Cruz-Garcia and C. Romero. 2011. Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems. Annals of Botany 108: 647-658.
72. McEwen, J. R., and J. C. Vamosi. 2010. Floral colour versus phylogeny in structuring subalpine flowering communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 277: 2957-2965.
73. McLernon, S. M., S. D. Murphy and L. W. Aarssen. 1996. Heterospecific pollen transfer between sympatric species in a mid-successional old-field community. American Journal of Botany 83: 1168-1174.
74. Meiners, S. J., K. Chui-Hua, M. L. Ladwig, N. L. Pisula and K. A. Lang. 2012. Developing an ecological context for allelopathy. Plant Ecology 213: 1221-1227.
75. Memmott, J., P. G. Craze, N. M. Waser and M. V. Price. 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology Letters 10: 710-717.
76. Memmott, J., N. M. Waser and M. V. Price. 2004. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 271: 2605-2611.
77. Mitchell, R. J., R. J. Flanagan, B. J. Brown, N. M. Waser and J. D. Karron. 2009. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Annals of Botany 103: 1403-1413.
78. Montgomery, B. R., and B. J. Rathcke. 2011. Effects of floral restric-tiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community. Oecologia 168: 449-458.
79. Montgomery, B. R., D. M. Soper and L. F. Delph. 2010. Asymmetrical conspecific seed-siring advantage between Silene latifolia and S. dio-ica. Annals of Botany 105: 595-605.
80. Morales, C. L., and A Traveset. 2008. Interspecific pollen transfer: Magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 27: 221-238.
81. Morales, C. L., and A Traveset. 2009. A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co flowering native plants. Ecology Letters 12: 716-728.
82. Moyle, L. C., and T Nakazato. 2010. Hybrid incompatibility "snowballs" between Solanum species. Science 329: 1521-1523.
83. Moyle, L. C., M. S. Olson and P Tiffin. 2004. Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58: 1195-1208.
84. Muchhala N, Z Brown, W.S. Armbruster and M D Potts. 2010. Competition drives specialization in pollination systems through costs to male fitness. American Naturalist 176: 732-743.
85. Muller, H. J. 1940. Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. In J. S. Huxley [ed.], The new systematics, 185-268. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
86. Murfett, J., T. J. Strabala, D. M. Zurek, B Mou, B Beecher, and B. A. McClure. 1996. S-RNase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: Multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species. Plant Cell 8: 943-958.
87. Murphy, S. D. 2000. Field testing for pollen allelopathy: A review. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 2155-2172.
88. Németh, M. B., and N. L. Smith-Huerta. 2006. Effects of pollen load size and maternal plant on pollen performance and seedling vigor in Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). International Journal of Botany 2: 83-92.
89. Olesen, J. M., and P Jordano. 2002. Geographic patterns in plant-pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83: 2416-2424.
90. Ollerton J, R Winfree and S Tarrant. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120: 321-326.
91. Orr, H. A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: The evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139: 1805-1813.
92. Petanidou, T., S. A. Kallimanis, J Tzanopoulos, S. P. Sgardelis and J. D. Pantis. 2008. Long-term observation of a pollinator network: Fluctuations in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecology Letters 11: 564-575.
93. Pusey, P. L., D. R. Rudell, E. A. Curry and J. P. Mattheis. 2008. Characterization of stigma exudates in aqueous extracts from apple and pear flowers. Horticultural Science 43: 1471-1478.
94. Rathcke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In L. Real [ed.], Pollination biology, 305-329. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
95. Ressayre, A., C. Raquin A Mignot B Godelle and P. H. Gouyon 2002. Correlated variation in microtubule distribution, callose deposition during male post-meiotic cytokinesis, and pollen aperture number across Nicotiana species (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 393-400.
96. Rosenberg, M. S., D. C. Adams and J Gurevitch. 2000. MetaWin: Statistical software for meta-analysis, version 2.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
97. Sargent, R. D., and D. D. Ackerly. 2008. Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 123-130.
98. Sargent R. D., S. W. Kembel N C Emery, E. J. Forrestel and D. D. Ackerly. 2011. Effect of local community phylogenetic structure on pollen limitation in an obligately insect-pollinated plant. American Journal of Botany 98: 283-289.
99. Schuett, E. M., and J. C. Vamosi. 2010. Phylogenetic community context influences pollen delivery to Allium cernuum. Evolutionary Biology 37: 19-28.
100. Scopece G., A. Widmer and S. Cozzolino. 2008. Evolution of postzy-gotic reproductive isolation in a guild of deceptive orchids. American Naturalist 171: 315-326.
101. Smith, R. A., and M. D. Rausher. 2008. Experimental evidence that selection favors character displacement in the ivyleaf morning glory. American Naturalist 171: 1-9.
102. Smith-Huerta, N. 1996. Pollen germination and tube growth in selfing and outcrossing populations of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 157: 228-233.
103. Smith-Huerta, N. L. 1997. Pollen tube attrition in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: 519-524.
104. Strauss, S. Y., C. O. Webb and N Salamin. 2006. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 5841-5845.
105. Sukhada, K., and A Jayachandra. 1980. Pollen allelopathy-A new phenomenon. New Phytologist 84: 739-746.
106. Thomson, J. D., B. J. Andrews and R Plowright. 1981. The effect of a foreign pollen on ovule development in Diervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). New Phytologist 90: 777-783.
107. Travers S and K Shea. 2001. Individual variation, gametophytic competition and style length: Does size affect paternity? Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 729-745.
108. Traveset A., and D. M. Richardson. 2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 208-216.
109. Waser, N. M. 1978. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59: 934-944.
110. Willmer, P. 2012. Pollinator-plant synchrony tested by climate change. Current Biology 22: R131-R132.
111. Winkler, E. A. 2012. Comparative pollination biology of Potentilla glandulosa, P. gracilis, and the invasive exotic, P. recta (Rosaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
112. Yang, C. F., Y. H. Guo, R Gituru and S. G. Sun. 2002. Variation in stigma morphology-How does it contribute to pollination adaptation in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae)? Plant Systematics and Evolution 236: 89-98.
113. Zinkl, G. M., B. I. Zwiebel, D. G. Grier and D Preuss. 1999. Pollen- stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: A species-specific interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine. Development 126: 5431-5440.