Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 691-702

  Lázaro, Amparo ^a   Lundgren, Rebekka ^a   Totland, Ørjan ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATOR; SELECTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 65449127074     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17168.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aigner, P. A. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness tradeoffs: when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95 : 177 184. (Pubitemid 33072974)
2. Aldridge, G. Campbell, D. R. 2007. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate Evolution 61 : 99 110. (Pubitemid 46417345)
3. Alexandersson, R. Johnson, S. D. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 631 636. (Pubitemid 34303999)
4. Andersson, S. Widén, B. 1993. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits in a synthetic population of Senecio integrifolius (Asteraceae) Oikos 66 : 72 79. (Pubitemid 23400522)
5. Armbruster, W. S. 2006. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of specialized pollination: views from the Artic to the tropics Waser, N. M. Ollerton, J. Plant-pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. Univ. of Chicago Press 260 282.
6. Bascompte, J. et al. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 9383 9387. (Pubitemid 37033937)
7. Bell, J. M. et al. 2005. Competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens Ecology 86 : 762 771. (Pubitemid 40383873)
8. Bosch, M. Waser, N. M. 2001. Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs Oecologia 126 : 76 83. (Pubitemid 32442514)
9. Brown, B. J. et al. 2002. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener Ecology 83 : 2328 2336. (Pubitemid 36524769)
10. Callaway, R. M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants Bot. Rev. 61 : 306 349. (Pubitemid 3025221)
11. Caruso, C. M. 1999. Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): effects of intra- vs interspecific competition Am. J. Bot. 86 : 663 668.
12. Caruso, C. M. 2002. Influence of plant abundance on pollination and selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata Ecology 83 : 241 254. (Pubitemid 34067693)
13. Chittka, L. Waser, N. M. 1997. Why red flowers are not invisible to bees Isr. J. Plant Sci. 45 : 169 183. (Pubitemid 27471602)
14. Chittka, L. Thomson, J. D. 2001. Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Chittka, L. Raine, N. E. 2006. Recognition of flowers by pollinators Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9 : 428 435. (Pubitemid 43914527)
16. Chittka, L. et al. 1996. Foraging dynamics of bumble bees: correlates of movements within and between plant species Behav. Ecol. 8 : 239 249.
17. Chittka, L. et al. 1999. Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution Naturwissenschaften 86 : 361 377. (Pubitemid 29399546)
18. Clarke, K. R. Gorley, R. N. 2001. Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. Primer-E, Plymouth.
19. Devoto, M. et al. 2005. Patterns of interaction between plants and pollinators along an environmental gradient Oikos 109 : 461 472. (Pubitemid 40534534)
20. Emlen, J. M. 1966. Role of time and energy in food preference Am. Nat. 100 : 611 617.
21. Faegri, K. van der Pijl, L. 1966. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon.
22. Feinsinger, P. et al. 1991. Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? - Field experiments Ecology 72 : 1953 1963.
23. Fenster, C. B. Dudash, M. R. 2001. Spatiotemporal variation in the role of hummingbirds as pollinators of Silene virginica Ecology 82 : 844 851. (Pubitemid 32175329)
24. Fenster, C. B. et al. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 : 375 403. (Pubitemid 40059725)
25. Gegear, R. J. Laverty, T. M. 1998. How many flower types can bumble bees work at the same time? Can. J. Zool. 76 : 1358 1365. (Pubitemid 128450920)
26. Ghazoul, J. 2006. Floral diversity and the facilitation in pollination J. Ecol. 94 : 295 304.
27. Gómez, J. M. Zamora, R. 1999. Generalization vs specialization in the pollination system of Hormatophylla spinosa (Cruciferae) Ecology 80 : 796 805. (Pubitemid 29188318)
28. Grindeland, J. M. et al. 2005. Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea Funct. Ecol. 19 : 383 390. (Pubitemid 41112583)
29. Gurevitch, J. et al. 2006. Community properties and mechanisms. The ecology of plants, 2nd ed. Sinauer 205 223.
30. Hegland, S. J. Totland, Ø. 2005. Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland Oecologia 145 : 586 594. (Pubitemid 41437694)
31. Hegland, S. J. Boeke, L. 2006. Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community Ecol. Entomol. 31 : 532 538. (Pubitemid 44379210)
32. Herrera, C. M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35 : 95 125.
33. Herrera, C. M. 2005. Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon? Am. J. Bot. 92 : 13 20. (Pubitemid 40113102)
34. Hersch, E. I. Roy, B. A. 2007. Context-dependent pollinator behavior: an explanation for patterns of hybridization among three species of Indian paintbrush Evolution 61 : 111 124. (Pubitemid 46417346)
35. Horvitz, C. C. Schemske, D. W. 1990. Spatiotemporal variation in insect mutualists of a neotropical herb Ecology 71 : 1085 1097. (Pubitemid 20429007)
36. Inouye, D. W. 1978. Resource portioning in bumblebees: experimental studies of foraging behavior Ecology 59 : 672 678.
37. Johnson, S. D. Steiner, K. E. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 : 140 143. (Pubitemid 30151590)
38. Johnson, S. D. et al. 2003. Pollination success in a deceptive orchid is enhanced by co-occurring rewarding magnet plants Ecology 84 : 2919 2927. (Pubitemid 38261440)
39. Jordano, P. 1987. Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries and coevolution Am. Nat. 129 : 657 677. (Pubitemid 18285365)
40. Kudo, G. Harder, L. D. 2005. Floral and inflorescence effects on variation in pollen removal and seed production among six legume species Funct. Ecol. 19 : 245 254. (Pubitemid 40802113)
41. Kunin, W. E. 1993. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behaviour effects on seed-set Ecology 74 : 2145 2160. (Pubitemid 24408639)
42. Kunin, W. E. 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber J. Ecol. 85 : 225 234. (Pubitemid 27206893)
43. Kunin, W. E. Iwasa, Y. 1996. Pollinator foraging strategies in mixed floral arrays: density effects and floral constancy Theor. Popul. Biol. 49 : 232 263. (Pubitemid 26310416)
44. Kwak, M. M. et al. 1991. Pollination of the rare species Phyteuma nigrum (Campanulaceae): flight distances of bumblebees Proc. Exp. Appl. Entomol. (Amsterdam) 2 : 131 136.
45. MacArthur, R. H. Pianka, E. R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment Am. Nat. 100 : 603 609.
46. Memmott, J. 1999. The structure of a plant-pollinator food web Ecol. Lett. 2 : 276 280. (Pubitemid 294563-1)
47. Memmott, J. et al. 2004. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 : 2605 2611. (Pubitemid 40502595)
48. Moeller, D. A. 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators Ecology 85 : 3289 3301. (Pubitemid 40084778)
49. Olesen, J. M. Jordano, P. 2002. Geographic patterns in plant-pollinator mutualistic networks Ecology 83 : 2416 2424. (Pubitemid 36524728)
50. Palmer, T. M. et al. 2003. Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds Am. Nat. 162 : S63 S79. (Pubitemid 37425178)
51. Petanidou, T. et al. 2008. Long-term observation of the pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization Ecol. Lett. 11 : 564 575.
52. Potts, S. G. et al. 2003. Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure plant communities? Ecology 84 : 2628 2642. (Pubitemid 38261153)
53. Price, M. V. et al. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study Ecology 86 : 2106 2116. (Pubitemid 41117481)
54. Rathcke, B. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination Real, L. A. Pollination biology. Academic Press 305 329.
55. Ricketts, T. H. et al. 2008. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol. Lett. 11 : 1121 1121.
56. Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. Santamaría, L. 2004. Why are so many hummingbird flowers red? PloS Biol. 2 : 12 15. (Pubitemid 39532907)
57. Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. Santamaría, L. 2005. Resource partitioning among flower visitors and evolution of nectar concealment in multi-species communities Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272 : 187 192. (Pubitemid 40502753)
58. Sahli, H. F. Conner, J. K. 2006. Characterizing ecological generalization in plant-pollination systems Oecologia 148 : 365 372. (Pubitemid 43800443)
59. Schueller, S. K. 2007. Island-mainland difference in Nicotiana glauca (Solanaceae) corolla length: a product of pollinator-mediated selection? Evol. Ecol. 21 : 81 98. (Pubitemid 46180127)
60. Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity Nature 163 : 688.
61. Stang, M. et al. 2006. Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant-flower visitor web Oikos 112 : 111 121.
62. Steffan-Dewenter, I. Tscharntke, T. 1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set Oecologia 121 : 432 440.
63. Stephens, D. W. Krebs, J. R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press.
64. Stout, J. C. et al. 1998. The influence of relative plant density and floral morphological complexity on the behavior of bumblebees Oecologia 117 : 547 550. (Pubitemid 29055386)
65. Ter Brak, C. J. F. Smilauer, P. 2002. Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (v. 4.5). Microcomputer Power, New York.
66. Thomson, J. D. 1982. Patterns of visitation by animal pollinators Oikos 39 : 241 250. (Pubitemid 13283496)
67. Thompson, J. N. 1999. The raw material for coevolution Oikos 84 : 5 16. (Pubitemid 29100993)
68. Toräng, P. et al. 2006. Facilitation in an insect pollinated herb with a floral display dimorphism Ecology 87 : 2113 2117. (Pubitemid 44215736)
69. Valido, A. et al. 2002. Native birds and insects, and introduced honey bees visiting Echinium wildpretii (Boraginaceae) in the Canary Islands Acta Oecol. 23 : 413 419. (Pubitemid 36028948)
70. Vázquez, D. P. Aizen, M. A. 2004. Asymmetric specialization: a pervasive feature of plant-pollinator interactions Ecology 85 : 1251 1257. (Pubitemid 39188081)
71. Vogel, S. 1954. Blütenbiologische Typen als Elemente der Sippengliederung, dargestellt anhand der Flora Südafrikas Bot. Stud. 1 : 1 338.
72. Waser, N. M. 1983. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of evidence Jones, C. E. Little, R. J. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 277 293.
73. Waser, N. M. 1986. Flower constancy: definition, cause and measurement Am. Nat. 127 : 593 603.
74. Waser, N. M. Ollerton, J. 2006. Plant-pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization. Univ. of Chicago Press.
75. Waser, N. M. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters Ecology 77 : 279 296. (Pubitemid 27282589)