Effect of local community phylogenetic structure on pollen limitation in an obligately insect-pollinated plant

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 283-289

  Sargent, Risa D ^a,b   Kembel, Steven W ^a,c   Emery, Nancy C ^a,d   Forrestel, Elisabeth J ^a,e   Ackerly, David D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Ecosystem services; Facilitation; Phylogenetic community structure; Pollen limitation; Pollination

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENTOMOPHILY; FACILITATION; OBLIGATE BEHAVIOR; PALYNOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; SEED SET; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASTERACEAE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; INSECT; PHYLOGENY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ASTERACEAE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC FITNESS; INSECTS; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SEEDS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; ASTERACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 79851494290     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000329     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agren, J. 1996. Population size, pollinator limitation, and seed set in the self-incompatible herb Lythrum salicaria. Ecology 77: 1779-1790.
2. Anselin, L. I. Syabri and Y. Kho. 2006. GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Geographical Analysis 38: 5-22.
3. Ashman, T. L., T. M. Knight, J. A. Steets, P. Amarasekare, M. Burd, D. R. Campbell, M. R. Dudash, et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: 2408-2421.
4. Bascompte, J. 2009. Disentangling the web of life. Science 325: 416-419.
5. Biesmeijer, J. C., S. P. M. Roberts, M. Reemer, R. Ohlemuller, M. Edwards, T. Peeters, A. P. Schaffers, et al. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313: 351-353.
6. Bremer, B., K. Bremer, M. W. Chase, J. L. Reveal, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, P. F. Stevens, et al. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
7. Brown, B. J., and R. J. Mitchell. 2001. Competition for pollination: Effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129: 43-49.
8. Cadotte, M., B. J. Cardinale, and T. H. Oakley. 2008. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 17012-17017.
9. Cariveau, D. P., and A. P. Norton. 2009. Spatially contingent interactions between an exotic and native plant mediated through flower visitors. Oikos 118: 107-114.
10. Chan, R. B. G. Baldwin, and R. Ornduff. 2001. Goldfields revisited: A molecular phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of Lasthenia (Compositae: Heliantheae sensu lato). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1347-1360.
11. Corbet, S. A., I. H. Williams, and J. L. Osborne. 1991. Bees and the pollination of crops and flowers in the European Community. Bee World 72: 47-59.
12. Davies, T. J., T. G. Barraclough, M. W. Chase, P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and V. Savolainen. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 1904-1909.
13. Emery, N. C. 2009. Ecological limits and fitness consequences of crossgradient pollen movement in Lasthenia fremontii. American Naturalist 174: 221-235.
14. Faith, D. P. 1994. Phylogenetic diversity: A general framework for the prediction of feature diversity. In P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, and R. I. Vane-Wright [eds.], Systematics and conservation education. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Geber, M. A., and D. A. Moeller. 2006. Pollinator responses to plant communities and implications for reproductive character evolution. In L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett [eds.], Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
16. Gerhardt, F., and S. K. Collinge. 2007. Abiotic constraints eclipse biotic resistance in determining invasibility along experimental vernal pool gradients. Ecological Applications 17: 922-933.
17. Ghazoul, J. 2004. Alien abduction: Disruption of native plant-pollinator interactions by invasive species. Biotropica 36: 156-164.
18. Goulson, D., M. E. Hanley, B. Darvill, and J. S. Ellis. 2005. Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biological Conservation 122: 1-8.
19. Hegland, S. J., and O. Totland. 2008. Is the magnitude of pollen limitation in a plant community affected by pollinator visitation and plant species specialisation levels? Oikos 117: 883-891.
20. Hickman, J. C. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
21. Holland, R. F., and S. K. Jain. 1981. Insular biogeography of vernal pools in the Central Valley of California. American Naturalist 117: 24-37.
22. Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3-35.
23. Kembel, S. W., P. D. Cowan, M. R. Helmus, W. K. Cornwell, H. Morlon, D. D. Ackerly, S. P. Blomberg, and C. O. Webb. 2010. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26: 1463-1464.
24. Knight, T. M. 2003. Floral density, pollen limitation, and reproductive success in Trillium grandiflorum. Oecologia 137: 557-563.
25. Knight, T. M., J. A. Steets, J. C. Vamosi, S. J. Mazer, M. Burd, D. R. Campbell, M. R. Dudash, et al. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36: 467-497.
26. Lichstein, J. W., T. R. Simons, S. A. Shriner, and K. E. Franzreb. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecological Monographs 72: 445-463.
27. Moeller, D. A. 2004. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 85: 3289-3301.
28. Moeller, D. A., and M. A. Geber. 2005. Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: Population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 59: 786-799.
29. Morales, C. L., and A. Traveset. 2009. A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecology Letters 12: 716-728.
30. Motten, A. F. 1986. Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecological Monographs 56: 21-42.
31. R Development Core Team, 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2.12. http://www.R-project.org.
32. Sargent, R. D., and D. D. Ackerly. 2008. Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 123-130.
33. Schemske, D. W., M. F. Willson, M. N. Melampy, L. J. Miller, L. Verner, K. M. Schemske, and L. B. Best. 1978. Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59: 351-366.
34. Schuett, E. M., and J. C. Vamosi. 2010. Phylogenetic community context influences pollen delivery to Allium cernuum. Evolutionary Biology 37: 19-28.
35. Schultheis, L. M. 2001. Systematics of Downingia (Campanulaceae) based on molecular sequence data: Implications for floral and chromosome evolution. Systematic Botany 26: 603-621.
36. Spigler, R. B., and S. M. Chang. 2009. Pollen limitation and reproduction varies with population size in experimental populations of Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Botany-Botanique 87: 330-338.
37. Strauss, S. Y., C. O. Webb, and N. Salamin. 2006. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 5841-5845.
38. Thorp, R. W. 1990. Vernal pool flowers and host-specific bees. In D. H. Ikeda and R. A. Schlising [eds.], Studies from the herbarium, California State University, Chico, number 8. The University Foundation, Chico, California, USA.
39. Thorp, R. W., and J. M. Leong. 1998. Specialist bee pollinators of showy vernal pool flowers. In C. W. Whitham, E. T. Bauder, D. Belk, W. R. Ferren Jr., and R. Ornduff [eds.], Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems, 169-179. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California, USA.
40. Vamosi, J. C., T. M. Knight, J. A. Steets, S. J. Mazer, M. Burd, and T.-L. Ashman. 2006. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 956-961.
41. Webb, C. O., D. D. Ackerly, and S. W. Kembel. 2008. Phylocom: Software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24: 2098-2100.
42. Webb, C. O., D. D. Ackerly, M. A. McPeek, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 475-505.
43. Webb, C. O., G. S. Gilbert, and M. J. Donoghue. 2006. Phylodiversitydependent seedling mortality, size structure, and disease in a Bornean rain forest. Ecology 87: 123-131.
44. Wiens, J. J., D. D. Ackerly, A. P. Allen, B. L. Anacker, L. B. Buckley, H. V. Cornell, E. I. Damschen, et al. 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters 13: 1310-1324.
45. Winfree, R., N. M. Williams, H. Gaines, J. S. Ascher, and C. Kremen. 2008. Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land-use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 793-802.