Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants

Social Science Research

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1207-1221

  Sutton, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Court; Cumulative disadvantage; Prosecution; Racial disparity; Sentencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878772660     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Albonetti C.A. Bail and judicial discretion in the district of columbia. Sociology and Social Research 1989, 74:40-47.
2. Albonetti C.A. Race and the probability of pleading guilty. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1990, 6:315-334.
3. Albonetti C.A. An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems 1991, 38:247-266.
4. Albonetti C.A. Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review 1997, 31:789-822.
5. Albonetti C.A. The avoidance of punishment: a legal-bureaucratic model of suspended sentences in federal white-collar cases prior to the federal sentencing guidelines. Social Forces 1999, 78:303-329.
6. Auerhahn K. Just another crime? Examining disparity in homicide sentencing. Sociological Quarterly 2007, 48:277-313.
7. Beckett K. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
8. Beckett K., Western B. Governing social marginality: welfare, incarceration, and the transformation in state policy. Punishment & Society 2001, 3:43-59.
9. Blumstein A. Prisons: a policy challenge. Crime: Public Policies for Crime Control 2002, 451-482. Institute for Contemporary Studies, Oakland, CA. J.Q. Wilson, J. Petersilia (Eds.).
10. Bridges G., Steen S. Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review 1998, 63:554-570.
11. Britt C.L. Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly 2000, 17:707-732.
12. Chen E.Y. Cumulative disadvantage and racial and ethnic disparities in California felony sentencing. Racial and Ethnic Politics in California 2008, 251-274. Institute of Government Studies Press, Berkeley, CA. B. Cain, J. Regalado, S. Bass (Eds.).
13. D'Alessio S.J., Stolzenberg L. A multilevel analysis of the relationship between labor surplus and pretrial incarceration. Social Forces 2002, 49:178-193.
14. Daly K. Rethinking judicial paternalism: gender, work-family relations, and sentencing. Gender and Society 1989, 3:9-36.
15. Demuth S. Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: a comparison of hispanic, black and white felony arrestees. Criminology 2003, 41:873-908.
16. Demuth S., Steffensmeier D. Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: comparisons among white, black, and hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly 2004, 85:994-1011.
17. Demuth S., Steffensmeier D. The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems 2004, 51:222-242.
18. DiPrete T.A., Eirich G.M. Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology 2006, 32:271-297.
19. Dixon J. The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology 1995, 100:1157-1198.
20. Eisenstein J., Jacob H. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts 1991, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.
21. Eitle D., Stolzenberg L., D'Alessio S.J. Police organizational factors, the racial composition of the police, and the probability of arrest. Justice Quarterly 2005, 22:30-57.
22. Emerson R.M. Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in Juvenile Court 1969, Aldine, Chicago.
23. Emerson R.M. Holistic effects in social control decision-making. Law & Society Review 1983, 17:425-455.
24. Farrell A., Ward G., Rousseau D. Race effects of representation among federal court workers: does black workforce representation reduce sentencing disparities?. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2009, 623:121-133.
25. Fearn N.E. A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly 2005, 22:452-487.
26. Feldmeyer B., Ulmer J.T. Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2011, 48:238-270.
27. Finkelstein M.O. A statistical analysis of guilty plea practices in the federal courts. Harvard Law Review 1975, 89:293-315.
28. Free M.D.J. Race and presentencing decisions in the United States: a summary and critique of the research. Criminal Justice Review 2002, 27:203-232.
29. Free M.D.J. Bail and pretrial release decisions: an assessment of the racial threat perspective. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 2004, 2:23-44.
30. Frenzel E.D., Ball J.D. Effects of individual characteristics on plea negotiations under sentencing guidelines. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 2007, 5:59-82.
31. Garfinkel H. 'Good' organizational reasons for 'bad' clinic records 1967, Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 189-207.
32. Gelman A., Hill J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
33. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2004, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
34. GeoLytics, 2006. CensusCD: Neighborhood Change Database (ncdb): 1970-2000 Tract Data. Geolytics, East Brunswick, NJ.
35. Goffman A. On the run: wanted men in a Philadelphia ghetto. American Sociological Review 2009, 74:339-357.
36. Hagan J. Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro-level and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1989, 26:116-135.
37. Hagan J. Crime and Disrepute 1994, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
38. Hagan J. Who Are the Criminals? The Politics of Crime Policy from the Age of Roosevelt to the Age of Reagan 2010, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
39. Hagan J., Zatz M.S. The social organization of criminal justice processing: an event history analysis. Social Science Research 1985, 14:103-125.
40. Helms R. Modeling the politics of punishment: a conceptual and empirical analysis of 'law in action' in criminal sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice 2009, 37:10-20.
41. Jacobs D., Carmichael J.T. The politics of punishment across time and space: a pooled time-series analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces 2001, 80:61-91.
42. Jacobs D., Helms R.E. Toward a political model of incarceration: a time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admission rates. American Journal of Sociology 1996, 102:323-357.
43. Jacobs D., Kleban R. Political institutions, minorities, and punishment: a pooled cross-national analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces 2003, 80:725-755.
44. Johnson B.D. Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology 2003, 41:449-490.
45. Johnson B.D. The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology 2006, 44:259-298.
46. Kautt P.M. Location, location, location: interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly 2002, 19:633-671.
47. Kautt P.M. Heuristic influences over offense seriousness calculations: a multilevel investigation of racial disparity under sentencing guidelines. Punishment & Society 2009, 11:191-218.
48. Kautt P.M. Is the offense serious axis free of extralegal influence? Assessing the predictors of a 'legally relevant' guideline criterion. American Journal of Criminal Justice 2009, 34:253-273.
49. Kellough G., Wortley S. Remand for plea. Bail decisions and plea bargaining as commensurate decisions. British Journal of Criminology 2001, 42:186-210.
50. Kessler D.P., Piehl A.M. The role of discretion in the criminal justice system. Journal of Law Economics & Organization 1998, 14:256-276.
51. King R.D., Johnson K.R., McGeever K. Demography of the legal profession and racial disparities in sentencing. Law & Society Review 2010, 44:1-32.
52. Kleck G. Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: a critical-evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty. American Sociological Review 1981, 46:783-805.
53. Klein S., Petersilia J., Turner S. Race and imprisonment decisions in California. Science 1990, 247:812-816.
54. Kramer J.H., Ulmer J.T. Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly 1996, 13:81-106.
55. Kramer J.H., Ulmer J.T. Sentencing Guidelines : Lessons from Pennsylvania 2009, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.
56. Kruttschnitt C., McCarthy D. Familial social control and pretrial sanctions: does sex really matter?. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 1985, 76:151-175.
57. LaFree G.D. Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: a comparison of guilty pleas and trials. Criminology 1985, 23:289-312.
58. Massey D.S., Eggers M.L. The ecology of inequality: minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970-1980. American Journal of Sociology 1990, 95:1153-1188.
59. McDavid J.C., Stipak B. Simultaneous scaling of offense seriousness and sentence severity through canonical correlation analysis. Law & Society Review 1982, 16:147-162.
60. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations 1973, 439-459. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. N.W. Storer (Ed.).
61. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 1977, 83:340-363.
62. Miethe T., Moore C. Racial differences in criminal processing: the consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment. Sociological Quarterly 1986, 27:217-237.
63. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2003. Drug Use Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities. NIDA, Bethesda, MD.
64. Pardoe I., Weidner R.R. Sentencing convicted felons in the United States: a Bayesian analysis using multilevel covariates. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2006, 136:1433-1455.
65. Petee T.A. Recommended for release on recognizance: factors affecting pretrial release recommendations. Journal of Social Psychology 1994, 134:375-382.
66. Piehl A.M., Bushway S.D. Measuring and explaining charge bargaining. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2007, 23:105-125.
67. Rios V.M. Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys 2011, New York University Press, New York.
68. Rodriguez G., Goldman N. An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 1995, 158:73-89.
69. Rodriguez G., Goldman N. Improved estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary response: a case study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 2001, 164:339-355.
70. Sampson R.J., Laub J.H. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life 1993, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
71. Sampson R.J., Laub J.H. Structural variations in juvenile court processing: inequality, the underclass, and social-control. Law & Society Review 1993, 27:285-311.
72. Sampson R.J., Laub J.H. A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency Transaction 1997, 133-162. New Brunswick, NJ. T.P. Thornberry (Ed.).
73. Sampson R.J., Lauritsen J.L. Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice 1997, 21:311-374.
74. Sampson R.J., Wilson W.J. Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. Crime and Inequality 1995, 37-54. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. J. Hagan, R.D. Peterson (Eds.).
75. Savelsberg J.J. Law that does not fit society: sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology 1992, 97:1346-1381.
76. Schlesinger T. Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly 2005, 22:170-192.
77. Schlesinger T. The cumulative effects of racial disparities in criminal processing. Journal of the Institute of Justice & International Studies 2007, 7:268-285.
78. Scott R.E., Stuntz W.J. Plea bargaining as contract. The Yale Law Journal 1992, 101:1909-1968.
79. Spohn C. Thirty years of sentencing reform: the quest for a racially neutral sentencing policy. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal 2000, 3:427-501.
80. Spohn C., DeLone M. When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race effects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance 2000, 2:3-37.
81. Spohn C., Holleran D. The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and hispanic male offenders. Criminology 2000, 38:281-306.
82. Spohn C., Spears J.W. Gender and case processing decisions: a comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women and Criminal Justice 1997, 8:29-59.
83. Standen J. Plea bargaining in the shadow of the guidelines. California Law Review 1993, 81:1471-1538.
84. Steen S., Engen R.L., Gainey R.R. Images of danger and culpability: racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology 2005, 43:435-468.
85. Steffensmeier D., Demuth S. Ethnicity and sentencing in U.S. Federal courts: who is punished more harshly?. American Sociological Review 2000, 65:705-729.
86. Steffensmeier D., Kramer J., Streifel C. Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology 1993, 31:411-446.
87. Steffensmeier D., Ulmer J., Kramer J. The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: the punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology 1998, 36:763-798.
88. Stolzenberg L., D'Alessio S.J., Eitle D. A multilevel test of racial threat theory. Criminology 2004, 42:673-698.
89. Stuntz W.J. The uneasy relationship between criminal procedure and criminal justice. Yale Law Journal 1997, 107:1-76.
90. Stuntz W.J. The pathological politics of criminal law. Michigan Law Review 2001, 100:505-600.
91. Sudnow D. Normal crimes: sociological features of the penal code in the public defender's office. Social Problems 1964, 12:255-275.
92. Sutton J.R. Doing time: dynamics of imprisonment in the reformist state. American Sociological Review 1987, 52:612-630.
93. Sutton J.R. The political economy of imprisonment in affluent western democracies. American Sociological Review 2004, 69:170-189.
94. Sutton J.R. Imprisonment and opportunity structures: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis. European Sociological Review 2012, 28:12-27.
95. Tonry M. Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
96. U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007. State Court Processing Statistics, 1990-2004: Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties. ICPSR, Ann Arbor, MI.
97. Ulmer J.T. Social Worlds of Sentencing : Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines 1997, State University of New York Press, Albany.
98. Ulmer J.T. Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly 2012, 29:1-40.
99. Ulmer J.T., Bradley M.S. Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses. Criminology 2006, 44:631-670.
100. Ulmer J.T., Johnson B. Sentencing in context: a multilevel analysis. Criminology 2004, 42:137-177.
101. Ulmer J.T., Kramer J.H. Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology 1996, 34:383-408.
102. Ulmer J.T., Kurlychek M.C., Kramer J.H. Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2007, 44:427-458.
103. Ulmer J.T., Eisenstein J., Johnson B.D. Trial penalties in federal sentencing: extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly 2010, 27:560-592.
104. Wacquant L. The new 'peculiar institution': on the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theoretical Criminology 2000, 4:377-389.
105. Weidner R.R., Frase R.S. Legal and extralegal determinants of intercounty differences in prison use. Criminal Justice Policy Review 2003, 14:377-400.
106. Weidner R.R., Frase R.S., Pardoe I. Explaining sentence severity in large urban counties: a multilevel analysis of contextual and case-level factors. Prison Journal 2004, 84:184-207.
107. Weidner R.R., Frase R.S., Schultz J.S. The impact of contextual factors on the decision to imprison in large urban jurisdictions: a multilevel analysis. Crime & Delinquency 2005, 51:400-424.
108. Weiss R., Berk R., Li W., Farrell-Ross M. Death penalty charging in Los Angeles County: An illustrative data analysis using skeptical priors. Sociological Methods and Research 1999, 28:91-115.
109. Wooldredge J. Neighborhood effects on felony sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2007, 44:238-263.
110. Wooldredge J., Griffin T., Rauschenberg F. (Un)anticipated effects of sentencing reform on the disparate treatment of defendants. Law & Society Review 2005, 39:835-874.
111. Zatz M.S. Pleas, priors, and prison: racial/ethnic differences in sentencing. Social Science Research 1985, 14:169-193.
112. Zatz M.S. The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1987, 24:69-92.
113. Zatz M.S. The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender and class on court decisionmaking: looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal 2000, 3:503-552.