Heuristic influences over offense seriousness calculations: A multilevel investigation of racial disparity under sentencing guidelines

Punishment and Society

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 191-218

  Kautt, Paula ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision making; Discretion; Federal sentencing; Heuristics; Offense seriousness; Sentencing guidelines

Indexed keywords

EID: 64749083835     PISSN: 14624745     EISSN: 17413095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1462474508101492     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Albonetti, C.A. (1991) 'An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion', Social Problems 38(2), 247-66.
2. Albonetti, C.A. (1992) 'Charge reduction: An analysis of prosecutorial discretion in burglary and robbery cases', Journal of Quantitative Criminology 8(3), 317-33.
3. Albonetti, C.A. (1997) 'Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses', Law and Society Review 31(4), 789-822.
4. Albonetti, C.A. (1998) 'The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white-collar offense under the federal sentencing guidelines', in J.T. Ulmer (ed.) Sociology of crime, law, and deviance, vol. 1, pp. 3-48. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Albonetti, C.A. and J.R. Hepburn (1996) 'Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendants' ascribed and achieved status characteristics', Journal of Quantitative Criminology 12(1): 63-81.
6. Albonetti, C.A., R.M. Hauser, J. Hagan and I.H. Nagel (1989) 'Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release', Journal of Quantitative Criminology 5(1): 57-82.
7. AOUSC (2001) Court and community: The U.S. probation and pretrial services system. Ed. U.P.a.P. Services. Washington, DC: Administrative Office of the US Courts.
8. Bontranger, S., W. Bales and T. Chiricos (2005) 'Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons', Criminology 43(3): 589-622.
9. Brandstätter, E., G. Gigerenzer and R. Hertwig (2006) 'The priority heuristics: Making choices without trade-offs', Psychological Review 113(2): 409-32.
10. Bridges, G. and S. Steen (1998) 'Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms', American Sociological Review 63(4): 554-70.
11. Church, T. (1995) 'Plea bargaining and local legal culture', in L. Epstein (ed.) Contemplating courts, pp. 132-54. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
12. Clogg, C.C., E. Petkova and A. Haritou (1995) 'Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models', American Journal of Sociology 100(5): 1261-93.
13. Cohen, L.J. (1981) 'Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4(3): 317-70.
14. Cosgrove, E.J. (1994) 'Robo-PO: The life and times of a federal probation officer', Federal Probation 58(3): 29-30.
15. D'Anca, A.R. (2001) 'Role of the federal probation officer in the guidelines sentencing system', Federal Probation 65(3): 20-3.
16. Dhami, M.K. and P. Ayton (2001) 'Bailing and jailing the fast and frugal way', Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 14(2): 141-68.
17. Engen, R.L. and R.R. Gainey (2000) 'Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed', Criminology 38(4): 1207-30.
18. Engen, R., R. Gainey, R. Crutchfield and J. Weis (2003) 'Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives', Criminology 41(1): 99-129.
19. Frank, J., S.G. Brandl, F.T. Cullen and A. Stichman (1996) 'Reassessing the impact of race on citizens' attitudes toward the police: A research note', Justice Quarterly 13(2): 321-34.
20. Gelman, A. (2007) Comparing the results from multilevel models fit to two groups. Available at http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/blog/
21. Gigerenzer, G. (2005) 'I think, therefore I err', Social Research 72(1): 195-218.
22. Gigerenzer, G. and D.G. Goldstein (1996) 'Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality', Psychological Review 103(4): 650-69.
23. Greene, W.H. (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Guthrie, C., J.J. Rachlinski and A.J. Wistrich (2001) 'Inside the judicial mind', Cornell Law Review 86(4): 777-830.
25. Guthrie, C., J.J. Rachlinski and A.J. Wistrich (2002) 'Judging by heuristic: Cognitive illusions in judicial decision making', Judicature 86(1): 44-50.
26. Hofer, P.J., C. Loeffler, K. Blackwell and P. Valentino (2004) Fifteen years of guideline sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. Ed. USS Commission. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
27. Hoffman, P.D. (2003) History of the federal parole system. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
28. Johnson, B.D. (2003) 'Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction', Criminology 41(2): 449-90.
29. Kahneman, D. (2003) 'A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality', American Psychologist 58(9): 697-720.
30. Kautt, P.M. (2009) 'Is the offense seriousness axis free of extralegal influence? Assessing the predictors of a "legally relevant" criterion', American Journal of Criminal Justice (in press).
31. Kautt, P. and C. Spohn (2002) 'Cracking down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions between offender race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences', Justice Quarterly 19(1): 1-35.
32. Klein, G. (1998) Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kramer, J. and D. Steffensmeier (1993) 'Race and imprisonment decisions', Sociological Quarterly 34(2): 357-76.
34. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1980) Applied regression: An introduction, vol. 22. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
35. Moerbeck, M. (2004) 'The consequence of ignoring a level of nesting in multilevel analysis', Multivariate Behavioral Research 39(1): 129-49.
36. Moore, C.A. and T.D. Miethe (1986) 'Regulated and unregulated sentencing decisions: An analysis of first year practices under Minnesota's felony sentencing guidelines', Law and Society Review 20(2): 253-77.
37. PSC (1997) Sentencing guidelines implementation manual. Pennsylvania: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing.
38. Raudenbush, S.W. and A.S. Bryk (2002) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn, vol. 1. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
39. Ruback, R.B. and J. Wroblewski (2001) 'The federal sentencing guidelines: Psychological and policy reasons for simplification', Psychology, Public Policy and Law 7(4): 739-75.
40. Rubin, A.B. and L.B. Bartell (1989) Law clerk handbook (No. FJC-M-89-2). Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
41. Schlesinger, T. (2005) 'Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing', Justice Quarterly 22(2): 170-92.
42. SCWG (2008) A structured sentencing framework and sentencing commission. London: Sentencing Commission Working Group: Judiciary of England and Wales.
43. Simon, H.A. (1983) Reason in human affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Spears, J.W. and C. Spohn (1997) 'The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases', Justice Quarterly 14(3): 501-24.
45. Spohn, C. (1990) 'Decision making in sexual assault cases: Do black and female judges make a difference?', Women and Criminal Justice 2(1): 83-105.
46. Spohn, C. (1992) 'An analysis of the "jury trial penalty" and its effect on black and white offenders', The Justice Professional 7(1): 93-112.
47. Spohn, C. (1994) 'Crime and the social control of blacks: Offender/ victim race and the sentencing of violent offenders', in G.S. Bridges and M.A. Myers (eds) Inequality, crime, and social control, pp. 249-68. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
48. Spohn, C. (2000) 'Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process', in J. Horney (ed.) Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system, vol. 3, pp. 427-501. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
49. Spohn, C. and J. Spears (1996) 'The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions', Justice Quarterly 13(4): 649-79.
50. Spohn, C., D. Beichner, E. Davis Frenzel and D. Holleran (2002) Prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases: A multi-site study, final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
51. Stanovich, K.E. and R.F. West (2000) 'Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5): 645-65.
52. Steen, S., R.L. Engen and R.R. Gainey (2005) 'Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing and criminal sentencing', Criminology 43(2): 435-67.
53. Steffensmeier, D. and S. Demuth (2000) 'Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in us federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?', American Sociological Review 65(5): 705-29.
54. Steffensmeier, D. and S. Demuth (2001) 'Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons', Criminology 39(1): 145-78.
55. Steffensmeier, D., J. Kramer and J. Ulmer (1995) 'Age differences in sentencing', Justice Quarterly 12(3): 583-601.
56. Steffensmeier, D., J. Ulmer and J. Kramer (1998) 'The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male', Criminology 36(4): 763-98.
57. Thaler, R.H., A. Tversky, D. Kahneman and A. Schwartz (1997) 'The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test', Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 647-770.
58. Tisdell, C. (1996) Bounded rationality and economic evolution: A contribution to decision making, economics and management. Northampton: Elgar.
59. Tonry, M.H. (1987) Sentencing reform impacts. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
60. Tonry, M. (1996) Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974) 'Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases', Science 185(4157): 1124-31.
62. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1981) 'The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice', Science 211(4481): 453-8.
63. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1984) 'Judgement of and by representativeness', in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds) Judgement under uncertainty: Hueristics and biases, pp. 84-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. USPPS (2001) The U.S. probation and pretrial services system. Court and Community. Washington, DC: USPPS.
65. Ulmer, J.T. (1997) Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
66. Ulmer, J.T. (2005) 'The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. District Courts: Evidence of processual order', Symbolic Interaction 28(2): 255-79.
67. Ulmer, J.T. and M.S. Bradley (2006) 'Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses', Criminology 44(3): 631-70.
68. Ulmer, J.T. and J.H. Kramer (1996) 'Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality', Criminology 34(3): 383-408.
69. Ulmer, J.T., M.C. Kurlychek and J.H. Kramer (2007) 'Prosecutorial discretion and the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences', Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 44(4): 427-58.
70. USSC (1999) United States Sentencing Commission, guidelines manual. §3e1.1 (Nov. 1999). Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
71. USSC (2000) United States Sentencing Commission, guidelines manual. §3e1.1 (Nov. 2000). Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
72. USSC (2001) United States Sentencing Commission, guidelines manual. §3e1.1 (Nov. 2001). Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
73. USSC (2002) United States Sentencing Commission, guidelines manual. §3e1.1 (Nov. 2002). Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
74. Wilmot, K.A. and C. Spohn (2004) 'Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines', Criminal Justice Policy Review 15(3): 324-43.
75. Wooldredge, J. and T. Griffin (2005) 'Displaced discretion under Ohio sentencing guidelines', Journal of Criminal Justice 33(4): 301-16.
76. Zatz, M.S. (1987) 'The changing forms of racial/ethnic bias in sentencing', Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 24(1): 69-92.