The impact of contextual factors on the decision to imprison in large urban jurisdictions: A multilevel analysis

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 400-424

  Weidner, Robert R ^a   Frase, Richard S ^b   Schultz, Jennifer S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual factors; County sentencing variations; Multilevel modeling; Prison sentences

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744437093     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128704271467     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Albonetti, C. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2. Arvanites, T. M. (1992). Increasing imprisonment: A function of crime or socio-economic factors? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 19-38.
3. Bowers, D. A. (1998). Giving people what they want: An exploratory analysis of felony sentencing in 49 states. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 22, 119-130.
4. Bowers, D. A., & Waltman, J. L. (1993). Do conservative states impose harsher felony sentences? An exploratory analysis of 32 states. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 61-70.
5. Britt, C. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
6. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1996). National assessment of structured sentencing. Washington, DC: Author.
8. Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1998). National survey of state sentencing structures. Washington, DC: Author.
9. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Annual survey of jails: Jurisdiction-level data, 1998 [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
10. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2002). State court processing statistics, 1990-1998: Felony defendants in large urban counties [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
11. Carroll, L., & Doubet, M. (1983). U.S. social structure and imprisonment. Criminology, 27(3), 449-456.
12. Chiricos, T. G. (1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29(4), 701-724.
13. Chiricos, T. G., & Crawford, C. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp. 281-309). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Crawford, C. (2000). Gender, race and habitual offender sentencing in Florida. Criminology, 38(1), 263-280.
15. Crawford, C., Chiricos, T., & Kleck, G. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36(3), 481-512.
16. Davis, R. C., & Smith, B. E. (1994). The effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions: A test in an urban setting. Justice Quarterly, 11(3), 453-512.
17. Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1157-1198.
18. Durose, M. R., Levin, D. J., & Langan, P. A. (2001). Felony sentences in state courts, 1998 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
19. Eisenstein, J., Flemming, R. B., & Nardulli, P. F. (1999). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. New York: University Press of America.
20. Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
21. Engen, R., & Gainey, R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38(4), 1207-1230.
22. Engen, R., Gainey, R., Crutchfield, R., & Weis, J. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology, 47, 99-130.
23. Frase, R. (1993). Implementing commission-based sentencing guidelines: The lessons of the first ten years in Minnesota. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2(2), 279-337.
24. Frase, R. (1995). State sentencing guidelines: Still going strong. Judicature, 78, 173-179.
25. Frase, R. (1999). Sentencing guidelines in Minnesota, other states, and the federal courts: A twenty-year retrospective. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 12, 69-82.
26. Greenberg, D., & West, V. (2001). State prison populations and their growth, 1971-1991. Criminology, 39(3), 615-654.
27. Harrison, P. M., & Karberg, J. C. (2003). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2002 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
28. Holleran, D., & Spohn, C. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42(1), 211-240.
29. Huang, W. S., Finn, M. A., Ruback, R. B., & Friedmann, R. R. (1996). Individual and contextual influences on sentence lengths: Examining political conservatism. The Prison Journal, 76(4), 398-419.
30. Kautt, P. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633-671.
31. Kautt, P., & Spohn, C. (2002). Cracking down on Black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders' race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 1-35.
32. Kennedy, P. (1993). A guide to econometrics (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kritzer, H. M. (1979). Political cultures, trial courts, and criminal cases. In P. F. Nardulli (Ed.), The study of criminal courts: Political perspectives (pp. 131-169). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
34. Marvell, T. B. (1995). Sentencing guidelines and prison population growth. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 696-709.
35. McCarthy, S. R. (1990). A micro-level analysis of social structure and social control: Intrastate use of jail and prison confinement. Justice Quarterly, 7(2), 326-340.
36. McGarrell, E. F. (1993). Institutional theory and the stability of a conflict model of the incarceration rate. Justice Quarterly, 70(1), 7-28.
37. Mears, D. P. (1998). The sociology of sentencing: Reconceptualizing decision making processes and outcomes. Law and Society Review, 32(3), 667-724.
38. Mears, D. P., & Field, S. H. (2000). Theorizing sanctioning in a criminalized juvenile court. Criminology, 38(4), 983-1020.
39. Michalowski, R. J., & Pearson, M. A. (1990). Punishment and social structure at the state level: A cross-sectional comparison of 1970 and 1980. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(1), 52-78.
40. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Nardulli, P. F., Fleming, R. B., & Eisenstein, J. (1988). The tenor of justice: Criminal courts and the guilty plea process. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
43. Peterson, R. D., & Hagan, J. (1984). Changing conceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings of sentencing research. American Sociological Review, 49, 56-70.
44. Raudenbush, S., Byrk, A., Cheong, Y., & Congdon, R. (2001). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
45. Reaves, B. (2001). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 1998. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
46. Sorensen, J., & Sternen, D. (2002). The effect of state sentencing policies on incarceration rates. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 456-475.
47. Spohn, C. (1999). Gender and the sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9(3/4), 365-399.
48. Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In J. Horney (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 427-502). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
49. Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149-184.
50. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281-306.
51. Spohn, C., & Spears, J. W. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions: A comparison of case outcomes for male and female defendants charged with violent felonies. Women and Criminal Justice, 8(3), 29-59.
52. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705-729.
53. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions: HispanicBlack-White comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-178.
54. Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 37(3), 411-446.
55. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763-798.
56. Taggart, W. A., & Winn, R. G. (1993). Imprisonment in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 74(4), 736-749.
57. Taylor, M. C. (1998). How White attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63, 512-535.
58. Tonry, M. (1999). Why are U.S. incarceration rates so high? Crime & Delinquency, 45(4), 419-437.
59. Turk, A. T. (1969). Criminality and legal order. Chicago: Rand McNally.
60. Ulmer, J. T. (1997). The social worlds of sentencing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61. Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137-178.
62. Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34(3), 383-407.
63. Weidner, R. R., & Frase, R. (2001). A county-level comparison of the propensity to sentence felons to prison. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 7(1), 1-22.
64. Weidner, R. R., & Frase, R. (2003). Legal and extralegal determinants of inter-county differences in prison use. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14(3), 377-400.
65. Weidner, R. R., Frase, R., & Pardoe, I. (2004). Explaining sentence severity in large urban counties: A multilevel analysis of contextual and case-level factors. The Prison Journal, 84(2), 184-207.
66. Wooldredge, J., & Gordon, J. (1997). Predicting the estimated use of alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13(2), 121-142.
67. Wooldredge, J., Griffin, T., & Pratt, T. (2001). Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data. Justice Quarterly, 78(1), 203-231.