A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 452-487

  Fearn, Noelle E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community context; Multilevel analysis; Sentencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444439568     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820500364668     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Albonetti, C. A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision-making in felony case processing. Criminology, 23, 623-644.
2. Albonetti, C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-265.
3. Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offenses, 1991 1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789 824.
4. Albonetti, C. A. (1998). The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white-collar offense under the federal sentencing guidelines. Sociology of Crime, Law, & Deviance, 1, 3-48.
5. American Religion Data Archive (ARDA 2000). The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Sociology. Retrieved January 15, 2003, from http://www.thearda.com
6. Applegate, B., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. Prison Journal, 77, 237-258.
7. Applegate, B., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. (2002). Public views toward crime and correctional policies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 89 100.
8. Applegate, B., Cullen, F. T., Turner, M., & Sundt, J. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you're-out laws: Global versus specific attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 517-534.
9. Austin, R. L., & Allen, M. D. (2000). Racial disparity in arrest rates as an explanation of racial disparity in commitment to Pennsylvania's prisons. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 200-220.
10. Austin, J., & Irwin, J. (2001). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11. Bailey, W. C. (1981). Inequality in the legal order: Some further analysis and commentary. Social Problems, 29, 51-60.
12. Baumer, E. P., Messner, S. T., & Felson, R. B. (2000). The role of victim characteristics in the disposition of murder cases. Justice Quarterly, 17, 281-308.
13. Beaulieu, M., & Messner, S. F. (1999). Race, gender, and outcomes in first degree murder cases. Journal of Poverty, 3, 47-68.
14. Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
15. Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386-398.
16. Berk, R. A., & Ray, S. C. (1982). Selection biases in sociological data. Social Science Research, 11, 352-398.
17. Black, D. (1989). Sociological justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Blalock, H. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.
19. Bohm, R. M. (1991). The death penalty in America: Current research. Cincinnati, OH: Andersen.
20. Borg, M. J. (1997). Southern subculture of punitiveness? Regional variation in support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 25-45.
21. Borg, M. J. (1998). Vicarious homicide victimization and support for capital punishment: A test of Black's theory of law. Criminology, 36, 537-567.
22. Bowers, D., Jr. (1998). Giving people what they want: An exploratory analysis of felony sentencing in 49 states. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 22, 119-130.
23. Box, S., & Hale, C. (1982). Economic crisis and the rising prisoner population in England and Wales. Crime and Social Justice, 17, 20-35.
24. Box, S., & Hale, C. (1985). Unemployment, imprisonment, and prison overcrowding. Contemporary Crises, 9, 209-228.
25. Box, S., & Hale, C. (1986). Unemployment, crime, and imprisonment, and the enduring problem of prison overcrowding. In R. Matthews & J. Young (Eds.), Confronting crime (pp. 72-96). London: Sage.
26. Bridges, G. S., & Crutchfield, R. D. (1988). Law, social standing, and racial disparities in imprisonment. Social Forces, 66, 699-724.
27. Britt, C. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
28. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Carroll, L., & Doubet, M. (1983). US social structure and imprisonment. Criminology, 21, 449456.
30. Chambliss, W. J., & Seidman, R. B. (1971). Law, order and power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Chiricos, T. G. (1987). Rates of crime and unemployment: An analysis of aggregate research evidence. Social Problems, 34, 187-212.
32. Chiricos, T. G., & Crawford, C. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and spaces (chap. 13). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. Demuth, S. H. (2000). The processing of white, black, and Hispanic defendants in large urban courts: Main and interactive effects of race and ethnicity on case-process decision-making. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61 (08), 3359. (UMI No. AAT 9982307)
34. DiPrete, T., & Forristal, J. (1994). Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 331-357.
35. Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157-1198.
36. Eisenstein, J., Flemming, R., & Nardulli, P. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
37. Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of felony courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
38. Farrell, R. A., & Holmes, M. D. (1991). The social and cognitive structure of legal decision-making. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 529-542.
39. Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Department of Justice. (1997). Crime in the United States, 1997. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
40. Fine, G. A. (1984). Negotiated orders and organizational cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 239-262.
41. Flanagan, T. J., a Longmire, D. R. (1996). American's view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Flemming, R., Nardulli, P., & Eisenstein, J. (1992). The craft of justice: Work and politics in criminal court communities. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43. Galster, G. C., & Scaturo, L. A. (1985). The US criminal justice system: Unemployment and the severity of punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 163-189.
44. Garland, D. (2000). The culture of high crime societies: Some preconditions of recent "law and order" politics. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 347-375.
45. Gerber, J., & Engelhardt-Greer, S. (1996). Just and painful: Attitudes toward sentencing criminals. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (chap. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Hagan, J. (1977). Criminal justice in rural and urban communities: A study of the bureaucratization of justice. Social Forces, 55, 595-612.
47. Hagan, J. (1993). Crime in social and legal context. Law & Society Review, 27, 255262.
48. Hagan, J., & Bumiller, K. (1983). Making sense of sentencing: A review and critique of sentencing research. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S. E. Martin, & M. H. Tonry (Eds.), Research on sentencing: The search for reform (Vol. 2, pp. 1-54). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. Hartman, R. (1991). A Monte Carlo analysis of alternative estimators in models involving selectivity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9, 41-49.
50. Hawkins, D. F. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment. Social Forces, 65, 719-745.
51. Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475-492.
52. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.
53. Heinz, A., Jacob, H., & Lineberry, R. L. (1983). Crime in city politics. New York: Longman.
54. Helms, R., & Jacobs, D. (2002). The political context of sentencing: An analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81, 577-604.
55. Holleran, D., & Spohn, C. C. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42, 211-240.
56. Holmes, M., Hosch, H., Daudistel, H., Perez, D., & Graves, J. (1996). Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two southwestern jurisdictions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 11-30.
57. Holmes, M. D. (2000). Minority threat and police brutality: Determinants of civil rights criminal complaints in US municipalities. Criminology, 38, 343-367.
58. Huang, W. S. W., Finn, M. A., Ruback, B. R., & Friedmann, R. R. (1996). Individual and contextual influences on sentence lengths: Examining political conservatism. Prison Journal, 76, 398-419.
59. Jackson, P. I. (1989). Minority group threat, crime, and policing. New York: Praeger.
60. Jackson, P. I., & Carroll, L. (1981). Race and the war on crime: The sociopolitical determinants of municipal police expenditures in 90 non-southern US cities. American Sociological Review, 46, 290-305.
61. Jacobs, D. (1978). Inequality and the legal order: An ecological test of the conflict model. Social Problems, 25, 515-530.
62. Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. M. (1996). Toward a political model of incarceration: A time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admissions rates. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 323-357.
63. Jancovic, I. 1977. Labour market and imprisonment. Crime and Social Justice, 8, 17-31.
64. Kautt, P. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19, 633-671.
65. Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 401-425.
66. Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and space? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922-963.
67. Liska, A. E. (1992). Introduction to the study of social control. In A. E. Liska (Ed.), Social threat and social control (chap. 1). Albany: State University of New York Press.
68. Liska, A. E., & Chamlin, M. B. (1984). Social structure and crime control among macrosocial units. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 383-395.
69. Liska, A. E., Lawrence, J. J., & Benson, M. (1981). Perspectives on the legal order: The capacity for social control. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 413-426.
70. Marenin, O., Pisciotta, A. W., & Juliani, T. J. (1983). Economic conditions and social control: An empirical assessment of the relationship between unemployment and incarceration in the USA, 1958-1978. Criminal Justice Review, 8, 43-53.
71. Michalowski, R. J., & Pearson, M. A. (1990). Punishment and social structure at the state level: A cross-sectional comparison of 1970 and 1980. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 52-78.
72. Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer.
73. Nardulli, P. F., Eisenstein, J., & Flemming, R. B. (1988). The tenor of justice: Criminal courts and the guilty plea process. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
74. Parker, R. N., & Horwitz, A. V. (1986). Unemployment, crime and imprisonment: A panel approach. Criminology, 24, 751-773.
75. Payne, B. K., Gainey, R. R., Triplett, R. A., & Danner, M. J. E. (2004). What drives punitive beliefs? Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 195-206.
76. Reaves, B. A. (2001). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 1998. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 187232.
77. Rosenstone, S. J., Kinder, D. R., Miller, W. E., & the National Election Studies. (2000). American national election study, 1996: Pre- and post-election survey [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 1999. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
78. Rossi, P., & Berk, R. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
79. Rottman, D. B., Flango, C. R., Cantrell, M. T., Hansen, R., & LaFountain, N. (2000). State court organization, 1998. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 178932.
80. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime, class, and community: An emerging paradigm. Law and Society Review, 27, 255-359.
81. Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Ethnicity, crime, and immigration: Comparative and cross-national perspectives (pp. 311-374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
82. Savelsberg, J. (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines and substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.
83. Savelsberg, J. (1994). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950-1990. Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews, 23, 862-863.
84. Sellin, T. (1928). The negro criminal: A statistical note. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 140, 52-64.
85. Snell, T. L. (2001). Capital punishment, 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 190598.
86. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Spohn, C. C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In The National Institute of Justice (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000, (Vol. 3, pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
88. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
89. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black white comparisons. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
90. Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J. H., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
91. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-793.
92. Stolzenberg, R., & Relles, D. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62, 494-507.
93. Sutton, J. (2000). Imprisonment and social classification in five common law democracies, 1955-1985. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 350-386.
94. Ulmer, J. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany: State University of New York Press.
95. Ulmer, J., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
96. Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383-408.
97. Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The use and transformation of formal decision-making criteria: Sentencing guidelines, organizational contexts, and case processing strategies. Social Problems, 45, 248-267.
98. US Census Bureau. (2000a). Census of population and housing, summary tape file 3. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
99. US Census Bureau. (2000b). County and city data book: 2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
100. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2000). State court processing statistics, 1998: Felony defendants in large urban counties [Computer file]. Conducted by Pretrial Services Resource Center. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
101. Williams, K. R., & Drake, S. (1980). Social structure, crime and criminalization: An empirical examination of the conflict perspective. The Sociological Quarterly, 21, 563-575.
102. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
103. Wilson, W. J. (1991). Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research. American Sociological Review, 56, 1-14.
104. Wong, G. Y., & Mason, W. M. (1985). The hierarchical logistic regression model for multilevel analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 513-524.
105. Wooldredge, J. D. (1998). Analytical rigor in studies of disparities in criminal case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 155-179.
106. Zatz, M. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender and class on court decision-making: Looking toward the 21st century. In The National Institute of Justice (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 503-552). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
107. Zimring, F. E. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.