Constitutional privileging

Virginia Law Review

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 683-752

  Coenen, Michael ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878768451     PISSN: 00426601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Ernest A. Young, The Constitution Outside the Constitution, 117 Yale L.J. 408, 461 (2007)
2. Josh Blackman, The Constitutionality of Social Cost, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 951, 962 (2011)
3. James Edward Wicht III, There Is No Such Thing as a Harmless Constitutional Error: Returning to a Rule of Automatic Reversal, 12 BYU J. Pub. L. 73, 99 (1997).
4. Robert G. Bone, The Process of Making Process: Court Rulemaking, Democratic Legitimacy, and Procedural Efficacy, 87 Geo. L.J. 887, 936 n.241 (1999).
5. Alexander M. Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics 111-98 (1962).
6. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., The Linkage Between Justiciability and Remedies - And Their Connections to Substantive Rights, 92 Va. L. Rev. 633, 699 (2006)
7. Christopher M. Fairman, Heightened Pleading, 81 Tex. L. Rev. 551, 553 (2002)
8. Steven S. Gensler, Judicial Case Management: Caught in the Crossfire, 60 Duke L.J. 669, 706 (2010)
9. Tara Leigh Grove, The Structural Safeguards of Federal Jurisdiction, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 869, 904 n.193 (2011)
10. Wayne R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 26.1(b) (5th ed. 2009).
11. Recent Case, D.C. Circuit Holds Claims of Harms to Native Inhabitants of the British Indian Ocean Territory Caused by the Construction of a U.S. Military Base Nonjusticiable: Bancoult v. McNamara, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 860, 864 (2007)
12. Fred O. Smith, Jr., Note, Crawford's Aftershock: Aligning the Regulation of Nontestimonial Hearsay with the History and Purposes of the Confrontation Clause, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 1497, 1525 (2008)
13. Roger J. Traynor, The Riddle of Harmless Error 55 (1970).
14. David R. Dow & James Rytting, Can Constitutional Error Be Harmless?, 2000 Utah L. Rev. 483, 484;
15. Steven H. Goldberg, Harmless Error: Constitutional Sneak Thief, 71 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 421, 441-42 (1980);
16. John H. Blume & Stephen P. Garvey, Harmless Error in Federal Habeas Corpus After Brecht v. Abrahamson, 35Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 163, 164 (1993).
17. William J. Stuntz, The Uneasy Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Criminal Justice, 107 Yale L.J. 1, 14 n.46 (1997)
18. Daniel J. Meltzer, Harmless Error and Constitutional Remedies, 61 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1, 28 (1994).
19. Richard H. Fallon, Jr. & Daniel J. Meltzer, New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies, 104 Harv. L. Rev. 1731, 1772 n.222 (1991).
20. Charles Alan Wright & Sarah N. Welling, Federal Practice and Procedure § 625 (4th ed. 2011);
21. Henry P. Monaghan, Constitutional Fact Review, 85 Colum. L. Rev. 229, 230 (1985).
22. Adam Hoffman, Note, Corralling Constitutional Fact: De Novo Fact Review in the Federal Appellate Courts, 50 Duke L.J. 1427, 1445-50 (2001) (recounting this history).
23. A. Christopher Bryant, Foreign Law as Legislative Fact in Constitutional Cases, 2011 BYU L. Rev. 1005, 1011 (2011)
24. Steven Alan Childress, Constitutional Fact and Process: A First Amendment Model of Censorial Discretion, 70 Tul. L. Rev. 1229, 1240 (1996).
25. Eugene Volokh & Brett McDonnell, Freedom of Speech and Independent Judgment Review in Copyright Cases, 107 Yale L.J. 2431, 2460 n.167 (1998)
26. Dan T. Coenen, A Constitution of Collaboration: Protecting Fundamental Values with Second-Look Rules of Interbranch Dialogue, 42 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1575, 1813, 1823 (2001).
27. David A. Sklansky, The Private Police, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1165, 1266 (1999)
28. George E. Dix, Nonconstitutional Exclusionary Rules in Criminal Procedure, 27 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 53, 63-82 (1989).
29. John F. Duffy, Administrative Common Law in Judicial Review, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 113, 194 (1998)
30. Ernest A. Young, Constitutional Avoidance, Resistance Norms, and the Preservation of Judicial Review, 78 Tex. L. Rev. 1549, 1593 (2000)
31. David A. Strauss, The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1457, 1486-90 (2001);
32. Adrian Vermeule, The Constitutional Law of Congressional Procedure, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 361, 366 (2004)
33. Frederick Schauer, Judicial Supremacy and the Modest Constitution, 92 Calif. L. Rev. 1045, 1056 (2004).
34. Daryl J. Levinson, Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 657, 687-88 (2011).
35. John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport, Our Supermajoritarian Constitution, 80 Tex. L. Rev. 703, 791-805 (2002)
36. John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport, A Pragmatic Defense of Originalism, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 383, 385 (2007)
37. John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport, Symmetric Entrenchment: A Constitutional and Normative Theory, 89 Va. L. Rev. 385, 418 (2003)
38. John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport, Originalism and the Good Constitution, 98 Geo. L.J. 1693, 1736-37 (2010).
39. Ethan J. Leib, Why Supermajoritarianism Does Not Illuminate the Interpretive Debate Between Originalists and Non-Originalists, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1905, 1909 n.19 (2007).
40. Pauline Maier, Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788, at 59-64 (2010)
41. Michael J. Klarman, The Founding Revisited, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 544, 557 (2011)
42. Daniel Okrent, Last Call: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition 104-05 (2010)
43. Andrew B. Coan, Talking Originalism, 2009 BYU L. Rev. 847, 852 (2009);
44. Michael J. Klarman, Antifidelity, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev. 381, 383-85 (1997).
45. Mitchell N. Berman, Originalism Is Bunk, 84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1, 81 n.202 (2009).
46. Akhil Reed Amar, The Supreme Court, 1999 Term - Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 26, 42 (2000)
47. Adrian Vermeule, Veil of Ignorance Rules in Constitutional Law, 111 Yale L.J. 399, 416, 416-19 (2001)
48. Lawrence G. Sager, The Incorrigible Constitution, 65 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 893, 951 (1990)
49. William N. Eskridge, Jr. & John Ferejohn, Super-Statutes, 50 Duke L.J. 1215, 1231 (2001).
50. Michael J. Gerhardt, Ackermania: The Quest for a Common Law of Higher Lawmaking, 40 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1731, 1748 (1999)
51. John H. Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial 261-62 (2003).
52. Mitchell N. Berman, Constitutional Decision Rules, 90 Va. L. Rev. 1, 35 (2004);
53. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., The Supreme Court, 1996 Term - Foreword: Implementing the Constitution, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 56, 57 (1997);
54. Henry P. Monaghan, The Supreme Court, 1974 Term - Foreword: Constitutional Common Law, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 2-3 (1975).
55. Lawrence Lessig, Fidelity in Translation, 71 Tex. L. Rev. 1165 (1993);
56. David Strauss, The Living Constitution (2010);
57. John F. Preis, Constitutional Enforcement by Proxy, 95 Va. L. Rev. 1663, 1696-703 (2009)
58. Evan J. Criddle, When Delegation Begets Domination: Due Process of Administrative Lawmaking, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 117, 177 (2011)
59. Michael Kammen, A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture 381-82 (1986);
60. Sanford Levinson, Constitutional Faith 9-17 (1988)
61. Steven G. Calabresi, "A Shining City on a Hill": American Exceptionalism and the Supreme Court's Practice of Relying on Foreign Law, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1335, 1397-404 (2006)
62. Jamal Greene, On the Origins of Originalism, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 79-81 (2009)
63. Thomas C. Grey, The Constitution As Scripture, 37 Stan. L. Rev. 1, 3 (1984)
64. Richard Primus, Constitutional Expectations, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 91, 95 (2010);
65. Adam M. Samaha, Talk About Talking About Constitutional Law, 2012 U. Ill. L. Rev. 783, 785
66. Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement, 93 Yale L.J. 1073, 1085 (1984)
67. Abram Chayes, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1281, 1284 (1976);
68. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Some Confusions About Due Process, Judicial Review, and Constitutional Remedies, 93 Colum. L. Rev. 309, 372 (1993)
69. Orin S. Kerr, The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 801, 840 (2004)
70. Cass R. Sunstein, The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More than Ever (2004);
71. Robin West, The Limits of Process, in Getting to the Rule of Law 32, 48 (James E. Fleming ed., 2011);
72. Frank I. Michelman, Constitutional Essentials 7 (Harvard Law Sch. Pub. Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 12-06, 2011), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1976580.
73. David A. Sklansky, Quasi-Affirmative Rights in Constitutional Criminal Procedure, 88 Va. L. Rev. 1229, 1238-39 (2002).
74. William J. Stuntz, The Collapse of American Criminal Justice 212 (2012)
75. Louis Kaplow, Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke L.J. 557 (1992);
76. Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1685, 1687-713 (1976);
77. Kathleen M. Sullivan, The Supreme Court, 1991 Term - Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards, 106 Harv. L. Rev. 22 (1992);
78. Cass R. Sunstein, Problems with Rules, 83 Calif. L. Rev. 953 (1995).
79. Seana Valentine Shiffrin, Inducing Moral Deliberation: On the Occasional Virtues of Fog, 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1214, 1217 (2010).
80. Frank I. Michelman, The Supreme Court, 1985 Term - Foreword: Traces of Self-Government, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 34 (1986)
81. Kermit Roosevelt III, Constitutional Calcification: How the Law Becomes What the Court Does, 91 Va. L. Rev. 1649, 1692-93 (2005)
82. Guido Calabresi, The Exclusionary Rule, 26 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 111, 112 (2003)