Talk about talking about constitutional law

University of Illinois Law Review

Volumn 2012, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 783-800

  Samaha, Adam M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867122841     PISSN: 02769948     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. Gary Lawson, On Reading Recipes ... and Constitutions, 85 GEO. L.J. 1823,1823-24 (1997)
2. Lawrence B. Solum, Semantic Origination 27-30
3. Univ. of 111. Coll. of Law, 111. Pub. Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, No. 07-24, 2008, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1120244.
4. Paul Brest, The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding, 60 B.U. L. REV. 204,218-22 (1980).
5. Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) (No. 437).
6. THE Black Panthers Speak 1,3 (Philip S. Foner ed., 1970).
7. Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson, Democracy and Disagreement ch. 8 (1996).
8. Benjamin R. Barber, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New age (1984).
9. Larry D. Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism AND JUDICIAL REVIEW (2004)
10. Barry Friedman, Mediated Popular Constitutionalism, 101 MICH. L. REV. 2596, 2602 (2003)
11. Reva B. Siegel, Text in Contest: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 297 (2001).
12. Neil K. Komesar, Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, ECONOMICS, and Public POLICY 3-5 (1994)
13. Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, Interpretation and Institutions, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 885, 886 (2003)
14. Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism 3 (2011) [hereinafter Balkin, Living Originalism]
15. Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (2011).
16. RONALD DwORKIN, Law's EMPIRE 70-72 (1986)
17. RONALD Dworkin, JUSTICE in Robes 120-23 (2006)
18. Paul Brest, The Fundamental Rights Controversy: The Essential Contradictions of Normative Constitutional Scholarship, 90 YALE L.J. 1063, 1091-92 (1981)
19. Laurence H. Tribe & Michael C. Dorf, Levels of Generality in the Definition of Rights, 57 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1057,1061-63 (1990)
20. Randy E. Barnett, Restoring the Lost CoNSTmrnoN: The Presumption of LIBERTY 118-23 (2004)
21. Lawrence B. Solum, The Interpretation-Construction Distinction, 27 CONST. COMMENT. 95, 100-08 (2010)
22. Keith E. Whittington, Constructing a New American Constitution, 27 CONST. COMMENT. 119, 120-29 (2010)
23. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Implementing the Constitution ix (2001)
24. Mitchell N. Berman, Constitutional Constructions and Constitutional Decision Rules: Thoughts on the Carving of Implementation Space, 27 CONST. COMMENT. 39, 39, 42 (2010).
25. Roderick M. Hills, Jr., The Pragmatist's View of Constitutional Implementation and Constitutional Meaning, 119 Harv. L. Rev. F. 173,175 (2006).
26. Laurence H. Tribe, America's Constitutional Narrative, DAEDALUS, Winter 2012, at 1,5,15-16
27. Louis Michael Seidman, Our Unsettled Constitution: a New Defense of Constitutionalism and Judicial Review 8, 55 (2001) (discussing the legitimizing function of constitutional claims in the United States when used to contest the existing order).
28. Adrian Vermeule, Constitutional Amendments and the Constitutional Common Law, in THE Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State 229 (Richard W. Bauman & Tsvi Kahana eds., 2006) (comparing judicial updating to formal amendment).
29. Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (2006), while directing excessive attention to a few vague clauses and principles. I will charitably assume that enforcement decisions regarding vague standards in the U.S. Constitution are socially significant, or that debate over those standards can have legitimating effects regardless of the social consequences following their enforcement.
30. BALKIN, Living Originalism, at 64-65 (distinguishing sociological.
31. Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Legitimacy and the Constitution, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1787,1795-96 (2005)
32. Adam M. Samaha, Dead Hand Arguments and Constitutional Interpretation, 108 COLUM. L. REV. 606, 625 (2008).
33. David Markell et al., What Has Love Got to Do with It?: Sentimental Attachments and Legal Decision-Making, 57 VILL. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2012) (manuscript at 5-6,15-23), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1923807
34. Arthur C. Brooks, Do People Really Care About the Arts for Future Generations?, 28 J. CULTURAL ECON. 275,283 (2004)
35. Arthur C. Brooks, Public Goods and Posterity: An Empirical Test oflntergen-erational Altruism, 13 J. PUB. ADMIN. RES. THEORY 165, 173-74 (2003)
36. David Popp, Altruism and the Demand for Environmental Quality, 77 LAND ECON. 339, 348 (2001)
37. Mary Ann Glendon, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse x (1991)
38. Robin West, Katrina, the Constitution, and the Legal Question Doctrine, 81 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1127, 1156, 1160-61 (2006)
39. West, Katrina, 1146-47
40. Robin West, The Constitution's Political Deficit (Oct. 28, 2011, 4:30 PM), available at http://hlpronline.com/2011/10/the-constitutions-political- deficit/.
41. Charles A. Holt & Susan K. Laury, Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects, 92 Am. Econ. Rev. 1644, 1647, 1653-54 (2002)
42. Olof Johansson-Stenman et al., Does Stake Size Matter in Trust Games?, 88 Econ. Letters 365,367-68 & tbls.1-2 (2005)
43. George L. Priest & Benjamin Klein, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. LEGAL STUD. 1, 4-5, 17 (1984)
44. Adam M. Samaha, Low Stakes and Constitutional Interpretation, 13 U. Pa. J. CONST. L. 305, 322-26 (2010)
45. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, Choices, Values, and Frames, 39 AM. PSYCHOLOGIST 341,344 (1984)
46. Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Gains, Losses, and the Psychology of Litigation, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev. 113,118-19 (1996)
47. Chris Guthrie, Framing Frivolous Litigation: A Psychological Theory, 67 U. CHI. L. Rev. 163,167 (2000)
48. John Rawls, The Law of Peoples 132-40 (1999)
49. John Rawls, Political Liberalism 136-37 (1993)
50. Michael Kammen, A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture 3 (1st ed. 1986)
51. Max Lerner, Constitution and Court As Symbols, 46 Yale L.J. 1290,1294,1298 (1937)
52. Adam M. Samaha, Randomization in Adjudication, 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1, 18-21 (2009)
53. Jack Goldsmith & Daryl Levinson, Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1791,1835 (2009).
54. Samuel Issacharoff, Constitutional Courts and Democratic Hedging, 99 GEO. L.J. 961 (2011)
55. Matthew C. Stephenson, "When the Devil Turns ...": The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review, 32 J. LEGAL STUD. 59 (2003).
56. Richard A. Epstein, Skepticism and Freedom: a Modern Case for Classical Liberalism 71-73 (2003)
57. Gary Lawson, The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State, 107 HARV. L. Rev. 1231,1231 (1994)
58. Janice Rogers Brown, "A Whiter Shade of Pale": Sense and Nonsense-The Pursuit of Perfection in Law and Politics (Apr. 20, 2000, 12:15 PM), available at http://www.ejournalofpoliticalscience.org/janicerogers brown.html
59. Tom R. Tyler, Why People Obey THE Law 5-7,161-63 (2006)
60. James R. Kluegel & David S. Mason, Fairness Mailers: Social Justice and Political Legitimacy in Post-Communist Europe, 56 EUR.-ASIA STUD. 813, 826 (2004)
61. Mitchell A. Seligson, The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries, 64 J. POL. 408,423-26,430-31 (2002)
62. Tom R. Tyler, Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation, 57 ANN. REV. PSYCHOL. 375 (2006)
63. Wendy Nelson Espeland & Mitchell L. Stevens, Commensuration As a Social Process, 24 ANN. REV. Soc. 313, 330-31 (1998)