Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 327-337

  Kirkwood, Adrian ^a   Price, Linda ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

scholarship of teaching and learning; student learning; teaching in higher education; technological determinism; technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878659304     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2013.773419     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ajjan, H. and Hartshorne, R. 2008. Investigating Faculty Decisions to Adopt Web 2.0 Technologies: Theory and Empirical Tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11 (1): 71 - 80. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
2. Åkerlind, G. S. 2003. Growing and Developing as a University Teacher - Variation in Meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (4): 375 - 390. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000122242
3. Åkerlind, G. S. 2007. Constraints on Academics' Potential for Developing as a Teacher. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (1): 21 - 37. doi: 10.1080/03075070601099416
4. Benson, R. and Brack, C. 2009. Developing the Scholarship of Teaching: What is the Role of e-teaching and Learning?. Teaching in Higher Education, 14 (1): 71 - 80. doi: 10.1080/13562510802602590
5. Blin, F. and Munro, M. 2008. Why Hasn't Technology Disrupted Academics' Teaching Practices? Understanding Resistance to Change through the Lens of Activity Theory. Computers & Education, 50 (2): 475 - 490. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
6. Browne, T., R. Hewitt, M. Jenkins, J. Voce, R. Walker, and H. Yip. 2010. 2010 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Education in the UK. Oxford: Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association. Accessed April 7. http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/groups/ssg/~/media/groups/ssg/surveys/TEL%20survey%202010_FINAL.ashx.
7. Gibbs, G. and Coffey, M. 2004. The Impact of Training of University Teachers on Their Teaching Skills, Their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of Their Students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5 (1): 87 - 100. doi: 10.1177/1469787404040463
8. Gonzalez, C. 2009. Conceptions of and Approaches to Teaching Online: A Study of Lecturers Teaching Postgraduate Distance Courses. Higher Education, 57 (3): 299 - 314. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9145-1
9. Goodfellow, R. and Lea, M. R. 2007. Challenging e-learning in the University. A Literacies Perspective, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
10. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). 2009. Enhancing Learning and Teaching through the Use of Technology: A Revised Approach to HEFCE's Strategy for e-learning. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Accessed April 17. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2009/09_12/09_12.pdf
11. Hockings, C. 2005. Removing the Barriers? A Study of the Conditions Affecting Teaching Innovation. Teaching in Higher Education, 10 (3): 313 - 326. doi: 10.1080/13562510500122149
12. Hutchins, P., M. T. Huber, and A. Ciccone. 2011. " Getting There: An Integrative Vision of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning." International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning 5 (1). Accessed April 17. http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v5n1/featured_essay/PDFs/_HutchingsHuberCiccone.pdf
13. Joint Information Systems Council (JISC). 2009. Effective Practice in a Digital Age. Bristol: JISC. Accessed April 17. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearningpedagogy/practice.aspx
14. Kember, D. and Kwan, K.-P. 2000. Lecturers' Approaches to Teaching and Their Relationship to Conceptions of Good Teaching. Instructional Science, 28 (5): 469 - 490. doi: 10.1023/A:1026569608656
15. Kirkwood, A. 2009. E-learning: You don't Always Get What You Hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18 (2): 107 - 121. doi: 10.1080/14759390902992576
16. Kirkwood, A. and Price, L. 2005. Learners and Learning in the 21st Century: What Do We Know about Students' Attitudes and Experiences of ICT that will Help us Design Courses?. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (3): 257 - 274. doi: 10.1080/03075070500095689
17. Kirkwood, A. and Price, L. 2012. " The Influence upon Design of Differing Conceptions of Teaching and Learning with Technology ". In Informed Design of Educational Technologies in Higher Education: Enhanced Learning and Teaching, Edited by: Olofsson, A. D. and Lindberg, O. 1 - 20. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
18. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A. and Ashwin, P. 2006. How Approaches to Teaching are Affected by Discipline and Teaching Context. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (3): 285 - 298. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680539
19. Nicholls, G. 2005. New Lecturers' Constructions of Learning, Teaching and Research in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (5): 611 - 625. doi: 10.1080/03075070500249328
20. Oliver, M. and Conole, G. 2003. Evidence-Based Practice and e-learning in Higher Education: Can We and Should We?. Research Papers in Education, 18: 385 - 397. doi: 10.1080/0267152032000176873
21. Pickering, A. M. 2006. Learning about University Teaching: Reflections on a Research Study Investigating Influences for Change. Teaching in Higher Education, 11: 319 - 335. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680756
22. Price, L. and Kirkwood, A. 2008. " Technology in the United Kingdom's Higher Education Context ". In The Globalised University: Trends and Challenges in Teaching and Learning, Edited by: Scott, S. and Dixon, K. C. 83 - 113. Perth: Black Swan Press.
23. Price, L. and Kirkwood, A. 2011. Enhancing Professional Learning and Teaching through Technology: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Practice among Teachers in Higher Education, York: Higher Education Academy.
24. Price, L. and Richardson, J. T. E. 2004. " Why is it Difficult to Improve Student Learning? ". In Improving Student Learning: Theory, Research and Scholarship, Edited by: Rust, C. 105 - 120. Oxford: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
25. Roberts, G. 2003. Teaching Using the Web: Conceptions and Approaches from a Phenomenographic Perspective. Instructional Science, 31 (2): 127 - 150. doi: 10.1023/A:1022547619474
26. Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J. D. 1992. Conceptions of Teaching Held by Academic Teachers. Higher Education, 24 (1): 93 - 111. doi: 10.1007/BF00138620
27. Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J. D. 2001. Revisiting Academics' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning. Higher Education, 41 (3): 299 - 325. doi: 10.1023/A:1004130031247
28. Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J. D. 2002. Identifying Academics' Orientations to Assessment Practice. Higher Education, 43 (2): 173 - 201. doi: 10.1023/A:1013796916022
29. Thorpe, M. 2008. Effective Online Interaction: Mapping Course Design to Bridge from Research to Practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (1): 57 - 72. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet24/thorpe.html
30. Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J. and Prosser, M. 2000. Scholarship of Teaching: A Model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (2): 155 - 168. doi: 10.1080/072943600445628
31. Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. 1996. Changing Approaches to Teaching: A Relational Perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21 (3): 275 - 284. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381211
32. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Waterhouse, F. 1999. Relations between Teachers' Approaches to Teaching and Students' Approaches to Learning. Higher Education, 37 (1): 57 - 70. doi: 10.1023/A:1003548313194
33. Zemsky, R., and W. F. Massy. 2004. Thwarted Innovation: What Happened to e-learning and Why? West Chester, PA: The Learning Alliance, University of Pennsylvania. Accessed April 17. http://www.irhe.upenn.edu/WeatherStation.html.