Developing the scholarship of teaching: What is the role of e-teaching and learning?

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-80

  Benson, Robyn ^a   Brack, Charlotte ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Academic professional development; Disciplinary knowledge; E learning; E teaching; Scholarship; Teacher knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 58449116359     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510802602590     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Benson, D. E., Haney, W., Ore, T. E., Persell, C. H., Schulte, A., Steele, J. and Winfield, I. (2002) Digital technologies and the scholarship of teaching and learning in sociology. Teaching Sociology, 30, pp. 140-157.
2. Benson, R., Brack, C. and Weaver, D. (2007) Supporting scholarly e-teaching: Lessons learned from a faculty-based initiative.
3. Biggs, J. (2003) Teaching for quality learning at university, SRHE & Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
4. Boyer, E. (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, University of Princeton, Princeton, NJ
5. Brew, A. (2006) Research and teaching: Beyond the divide, Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills, UK
6. Canning, J. (2007) Pedagogy as a discipline: Emergence, sustainability and professionalism. Teaching in Higher Education, 12:3, pp. 393-403.
7. Dron, J. (2007) Control and constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose, Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA
8. Duffy, T. M. and Cunningham, D. J. (1996) Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 170-198. Macmillan, New York
9. Galison, P. (1997) Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
10. Garrison, D. R. and Kanuka, H. (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, pp. 95-105.
11. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C. and Tickner, S. (2001) Competencies for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49:1, pp. 65-72.
12. Grossman, P. L. (1990) The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
13. Haigh, N. (2005) An institutional perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning.
14. (1990) Online education: Perspectives on a new environment, Praeger, New York
15. Healey, M. (2000) Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19:2, pp. 169-189.
16. Healey, M. (2005) Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, pp. 30-42. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK
17. Huber, M. T. and Morreale, S. P. (2002) Situating the scholarship of teaching and learning: A cross-disciplinary conversation. Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground, Washington, DC
18. Hutchings, P. (2000) Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Menlo Park, CA
19. (2002) Ethics of inquiry: Issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Menlo Park, CA
20. Hutchings, P. and Shulman, L. S. (1999) The scholarship of teaching. Change, 31:5, pp. 11-15.
21. Jonassen, D. H. (1999) Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
22. Kreber, C. (2004) An analysis of two models of reflection and their implications for educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9:1, pp. 29-49.
23. Kreber, C. (2005) Charting a critical course on the scholarship of university teaching movement. Studies in Higher Education, 30:4, pp. 389-405.
24. Kreber, C. (2006) Developing the scholarship of teaching through transformative learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6:1, pp. 88-109.
25. Kreber, C. and Cranton, P. A. (2000) Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71:4, pp. 476-495.
26. Laurillard, D. (2002) Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, Routledge, London
27. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1993) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
28. Leadbeater, C. (2007) The rise of the amateur professional.
29. Lynch, J., Sheard, J., Carbone, A. and Collins, F. (2005) Individual and organisational factors influencing academics' decisions to pursue the scholarship of teaching ICT. Journal of Information Technology Education, 4, pp. 219-236.
30. Marton, F. (1981) Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, pp. 177-200.
31. Mezirow, J. (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
32. Mills, D. and Huber, M. T. (2005) Anthropology and the educational 'trading zone': Disciplinarity, pedagogy and professionalism. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4:1, pp. 9-32.
33. Moore, M. (1980) Redefining the discipline of adult education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
34. Nicholls, G. (2004) Scholarship in teaching as a core professional value: What does this mean to the academic?. Teaching in Higher Education, 9:1, pp. 29-42.
35. O'Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.
36. Oliver, R. and Herrington, J. (2001) Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education, Centre for Research in Information Technology and Communications, Edith Cowan University, Mt Lawley, WA
37. Decoding the disciplines: Helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for teaching and learning No. 98, San Francisco, CA
38. Parker, J. (2003) Writing, revising and practising the disciplines: Carnegie, Cornell and the scholarship of teaching. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2:2, pp. 139-153.
39. Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to teach in higher education, Routledge, London
40. Richardson, J. T. E. (1999) The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69:1, pp. 53-82.
41. Ryan, Y. Do you YouTube? Wanna come to MySpace? Musings on narcissism in the 21st Century student, keynote address at First Year in Higher Education Conference.
42. Salmon, G. (2003) E-moderation: The key to teaching and learning online, Routledge Falmer, London
43. Schön, D. (1995) The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, pp. 26-34.
44. Shulman, L. S. (1999) Taking learning seriously. Change, 31:4, pp. 10-17.
45. Shulman, L. S. (2000) From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning?. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1:1, pp. 48-52.
46. Strampel, K. and Oliver, R. Using technology to foster reflection in higher education. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007
47. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching About the Carnegie Foundation.
48. Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J. and Prosser, M. (2000) Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19:2, pp. 155-168.
49. Trigwell, K. and Shale, S. (2004) Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29:4, pp. 523-536.
50. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA