Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory

Computers and Education

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 475-490

  Blin, Françoise ^a   Munro, Morag ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Disruption; Functional organs; Higher education; Teaching practices; VLEs

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ACTIVITY THEORY; DISRUPTION; FUNCTIONAL ORGANS; HIGHER EDUCATION; TEACHING PRACTICES;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 38149083494     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barab S., Barnett M., and Squire K. Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 11 4 (2002) 489-542
2. Blin F. CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL 16 2 (2004) 377-395
3. Brill J., and Galloway C. Perils and promises: University instructors' integration of technology in classroom-based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology 38 1 (2007) 95-105
4. Burbules N., and Callister T. Universities in transition: The promise and the challenge of new technologies. Teachers College Record 102 2 (2000) 271-293
5. In: Chaiklin S., Hedegaard M., and Jensen U.J. (Eds). Activity theory and social practice (1999), Aarhus University Press, Aarhus
6. Christensen C. The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail (1997), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
7. Christensen, C., Aaron, S., & Clark, W., (2002). Disruption in education. In M. Devlin, R. Larson, & J. Meyerson (Eds.), The internet and the university: forum 2001. Last retrieved on 19 April 2007 from Educause: .
8. Commission for Communications Regulation (COMREG), (2007). The internet and -broadband experience for residential users: A communications survey report based on the trends survey service. Document No: 07/12. Dublin: COMREG.
9. Conole, G. (2004). E-learning: The hype and the reality. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (Designing and Developing for the Disciplines Special Issue), 12. Last retrieved on19 April 2007 from .
10. Dewey J. Democracy and education (1916), Macmillan, New York
11. Engeström Y. Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (1987), Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki
12. Engeström Y. Activity theory and transformation. In: Engeström Y., Miettinen R., and Punamäki R.-L. (Eds). Perspectives on activity theory (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 19-38
13. Engeström Y. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14 1 (2001) 133-156
14. Friere P. Pedagogy of the oppressed (1972), Penguin, Harmondsworth
15. Galvin, M., (2006). qualitative analysis of moodle questionnaire - unpublished internal report. Dublin City University.
16. Helle M. Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 12 (2000) 81-114
17. Hémard D. Evaluating hypermedia structures as a means of improving language learning strategies and motivation. ReCALL 18 1 (2006) 24-44
18. In: Jonassen D., and Land S. (Eds). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
19. Kaptelinin V., and Nardi B. Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design (2006), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Keller C. Virtual learning environments: Three implementation perspectives. Learning, Media and Technology 30 3 (2005) 299-311
21. Kellner D. Technological transformation, multiple literacies, and the re-visioning of education. E-Learning 1 1 (2004) 9-37
22. Kirkup G., and Kirkwood A. Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching - a tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learning, Media and Technology 30 2 (2005) 185-199
23. Kuutti K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi B. (Ed). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (1996), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 17-44
24. Laurillard D. Preface. In: Beetham H., and Sharpe R. (Eds). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing and delivering e-learning (2007), Routlege, London
25. Leontiev A.N. Activity, consciousness and personality (1978), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
26. Löfström E., and Nevgi A. From strategic planning to meaningful learning: diverse perspectives on the development of web-based teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 38 2 (2007) 312-324
27. McAndrew, P., Taylor, J., & Clow, D., (2006). Methods for evaluating learning, collaboration and technology use in distributed virtual environments and mobile environments: Supporting first-aider training. Last retrieved from The Open University -Knowledge Network on 21 April 2007 from .
28. McMullin, B., & Munro, M. (2004). Moodle at DCU. Paper presented at EdTech 2004, the Fifth Annual Irish Educational Technology Users' Conference. Last retrieved on 30 April 2007 from .
29. Salmon G. E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2000), Kogan Page, London
30. Scanlon E., and Issroff K. Activity theory and higher education: Evaluating learning technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 (2005) 430-439
31. Selwyn N. The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 2 (2007) 83-94
32. Tearle P. ICT implementation: What makes the difference?. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 5 (2003) 567-583
33. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA