Host DNA damage response facilitates African swine fever virus infection

Veterinary Microbiology

Volumn 165, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 140-147

  Simões, Margarida ^a   Martins, Carlos ^a   Ferreira, Fernando ^a  

^a FACULDADE DE MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

African swine fever virus; Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Rad 3 related; DNA damage response; Homologous recombination; Non Homologous End Joining

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; CAFFEINE; CHECKPOINT KINASE RAD3; DNA; DNA DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; DOXORUBICIN; PROTEIN P53; WORTMANNIN;

AFRICAN SWINE FEVER; AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN;

AFRICAN SWINE FEVER; AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS; ANIMALS; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED PROTEINS; CERCOPITHECUS AETHIOPS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SWINE; VERO CELLS;

AFRICAN SWINE FEVER VIRUS; ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA;

EID: 84878645824     PISSN: 03781135     EISSN: 18732542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen J.L., Le Rouzic E., Planelles V. HIV-1 Vpr: mechanisms of G2 arrest and apoptosis. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2008, 85(1):2-10.
2. Ballester M., Rodríguez-Cariño C., Pérez M., Gallardo C., Rodríguez J.M., Salas M.L., Rodriguez F. Disruption of nuclear organization during the initial phase of African swine fever virus infection. J. Virol. 2011, 85(16):8263-8269.
3. Brookes S.M., Dixon L.K., Parkhouse R.M.E. Assembly of African swine fever virus: quantitative ultrastructural analysis in vitro and in vivo. Virology 1996, 224(1):84-92.
4. Brown E.J., Baltimore D. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 2000, 14(4):397-402.
5. Carrascosa A.L., Bustos M.J., Leon P. Methods for growing and titrating African swine fever virus: field and laboratory samples. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 2011, 53. 26.14.21-26.14.25.
6. Carson C.T., Orazio N.I., Lee D.V., Suh J., Bekker-Jensen S., Araujo F.D., Lakdawala S.S., Lilley C.E., Bartek J., Lukas J., Weitzman M.D. Mislocalization of the MRN complex prevents ATR signaling during adenovirus infection. EMBO J. 2009, 28(6):652-662.
7. Carson C.T., Schwartz R.A., Stracker T.H., Lilley C.E., Lee D.V., Weitzman M.D. The Mre11 complex is required for ATM activation and the G2/M checkpoint. EMBO J. 2003, 22(24):6610-6620.
8. Casper A.M., Nghiem P., Arlt M.F., Glover T.W. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 2002, 111(6):779-789.
9. Castelló A., Quintas A., Sánchez E.G., Sabina P., Nogal M., Carrasco L., Revilla Y. Regulation of host translational machinery by African swine fever virus. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5(8):e1000562.
10. Chaurushiya M.S., Weitzman M.D. Viral manipulation of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8(9):1166-1176.
11. Choudhuri T., Verma S.C., Lan K., Murakami M., Robertson E.S. The ATM/ATR signaling effector Chk2 is targeted by Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C to release the G2/M cell cycle block. J. Virol. 2007, 81(12):6718-6730.
12. Dai Y., Grant S. New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16(2):376-383.
13. Flynn R.L., Zou L. ATR: a master conductor of cellular responses to DNA replication stress. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36(3):133-140.
14. Garcia-Beato R., Salas M.L., Viñuela E., Salas J. Role of the host cell nucleus in the replication of African swine fever virus DNA. Virology 1992, 188(2):637-649.
15. Gómez del Moral M., Ortuño E., Fernández-Zapatero P., Alonso F., Alonso C., Ezquerra A., Domínguez J. African swine fever virus infection induces tumor necrosis factor alpha production: implications in pathogenesis. J. Virol. 1999, 73(3):2173-2180.
16. Jackson S.P., Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 2009, 461(7267):1071-1078.
17. King A.M.Q., Lefkowitz E., Adams M.J., Carstens E.B. Ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Virus Taxonomy 2011, 153-162. Elsevier, London. 1st ed. A.M.Q. King (Ed.).
18. Lakdawala S.S., Schwartz R.A., Ferenchak K., Carson C.T., McSharry B.P., Wilkinson G.W., Weitzman M.D. Differential requirements of the C terminus of Nbs1 in suppressing adenovirus DNA replication and promoting concatemer formation. J. Virol. 2008, 82(17):8362-8372.
19. Lilley C., Schwartz R., Weitzman M. Using or abusing: viruses and the cellular DNA damage response. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15(3):119-126.
20. Lilley C.E., Chaurushiya M.S., Weitzman M.D. Chromatin at the intersection of viral infection and DNA damage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1799(3-4):319-327.
21. Lilley C.E., Weitzman M.D. Keeping viruses in Chk: DNA damage signaling puts the brakes on transformation. Cell. Host Microbe. 2010, 8(6):464-466.
22. Lu Y.P., Lou Y.R., Peng Q.Y., Xie J.G., Nghiem P., Conney A.H. Effect of caffeine on the ATR/Chk1 pathway in the epidermis of UVB-irradiated mice. Cancer Res. 2008, 68(7):2523-2529.
23. Luo M.H., Rosenke K., Czornak K., Fortunato E.A. Human cytomegalovirus disrupts both ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein (ATM)- and ATM-Rad3-related kinase-mediated DNA damage responses during lytic infection. J. Virol. 2007, 81(4):1934-1950.
24. Nam E.A., Cortez D. ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. Biochem. J. 2011, 436(3):527-536.
25. Nghiem P., Park P.K., Kim Y.S., Desai B.N., Schreiber S.L. ATR is not required for p53 activation but synergizes with p53 in the replication checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277(6):4428-4434.
26. Nghiem P., Park P.K., Kim Y.S., Vaziri C., Schreiber S.L. ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation. PNAS 2001, 98(16):9092-9097.
27. Nichols G.J., Schaack J., Ornelles D.A. Widespread phosphorylation of histone H2AX by species C adenovirus infection requires viral DNA replication. J. Virol. 2009, 83(12):5987-5998.
28. Rodriguez R., Meuth M. Chk1 and p21 cooperate to prevent apoptosis during DNA replication fork stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17(1):402-412.
29. Rojo G., García-Beato R., Viñuela E., Salas M.L., Salas J. Replication of African swine fever virus DNA in infected cells. Virology 1999, 257(2):524-536.
30. Waf1/CIP1 activation through the ATR-Chk1 pathway. Cancer Lett. 2010, 296(1):55-64.
31. Sarkaria J.N., Busby E.C., Tibbetts R.S., Roos P., Taya Y., Karnitz L.M., Abraham R.T. Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase activities by the radiosensitizing agent, caffeine. Cancer Res. 1999, 59(17):4375-4382.
32. Sarkaria J.N., Tibbetts R.S., Busby E.C., Kennedy A.P., Hill D.E., Abraham R.T. Inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase related kinases by the radiosensitizing agent wortmannin. Cancer Res. 1998, 58(19):4375-4382.
33. Tulman E.R., Delhon G.A., Ku B.K., Rock D.L. African swine fever virus. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2009, 328:43-87.
34. Weitzman M.D., Carson C.T., Schwartz R.A., Lilley C.E. Interactions of viruses with the cellular DNA repair machinery. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3(8-9):1165-1173.
35. Weitzman M.D., Lilley C.E., Chaurushiya M.S. Genomes in conflict: maintaining genome integrity during virus infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 64:61-81.
36. Wilkinson D.E., Weller S.K. Recruitment of cellular recombination and repair proteins to sites of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication is dependent on the composition of viral proteins within prereplicative sites and correlates with the induction of the DNA damage response. J. Virol. 2004, 78(9):4783-4796.
37. Wilkinson D.E., Weller S.K. Herpes simplex virus type I disrupts the ATR dependent DNA-damage response during lytic infection. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119(Pt 13):2695-2703.
38. Yajima H., Lee K.J., Chen B.P. ATR-dependent phosphorylation of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in response to UV-induced replication stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26(20):7520-7528.