The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a post-colonial power

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 283-303

  Onar, Nora Fisher ^a   Nicolaïdis, Kalypso ^b  

^a BAHCESEHIR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

colonialism; engaging; EU; Eurocentric; human rights; normative power; post colonial; provincializing; reconstruction(s)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878637962     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836713485384     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Acharya A,Buzan BNon-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. London: Routledge; 2010:.
2. The Convergence of Civilisations? Constructing a Mediterranean Region. Adler EBicchi FCrawford B, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:.
3. Ahiska M.Occidentalism: the historical fantasy of the modern.South Atlantic Quarterly. 2000;102 (2/3): 351-379.
4. Aydin CThe Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Asian and Pan-Islamic Thought. New York: Columbia University Press; 2007:.
5. Aydinli E,Matthews J.Periphery theorising for a truly internationalised discipline: spinning IR theory out of Anatolia.Review of International Studies. 2009;34 (4): 693-712.
6. Barkawi T,Laffey M.The postcolonial moment in security studies.Review of International Studies. 2006;32:329-352.
7. Bechev D,Nicolaïdis K.From policy to polity: can the EU's special relations with its neighbourhood be decentred?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2010;48 (3): 475-500.
8. Beck UWorld Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity; 1999:.
9. Beck U.Living in the world risk society.Economy and Society. 2006;35 (3): 329-345.
10. Bernal MBlack Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilisation, Volume II: The Archaeological and Documentary Evidence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1991:.
11. Bickerton C.Functionality in EU foreign policy: towards a new research agenda?.Journal of European Integration. 2010;32 (2): 213-227.
12. Bilgin P.Thinking past 'western' IR.Third World Quarterly. 2008;29 (1): 5-23.
13. Black L,Rhys-Taylor A.Xenophobia: Europe's death knell.Opendemocracy. 2011;:.
14. Blaut JThe Coloniser's Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: Guilford; 1993:.
15. Bleiker RThe Zen of International Relations. Chan SMandaville P, ed. New York: Palgrave; 2001:.
16. Bruckner PThe Tyranny of Guilt: An Essay on Western Masochism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2010:.
17. Buruma I,Margalit AOccidentalism: The West in the Eyes of its Enemies. New York: Penguin; 2004:.
18. Buzan B.Rethinking security after the Cold War.Cooperation and Conflict. 1997;32 (1): 5-28.
19. Chaban N,Elgström O,Holland M.The European Union as others see it.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2006;11 (2): 245-262.
20. Chakrabarty DProvincialising Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historic Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
21. ChandyLGertzG (2011) Two trends in global poverty. Brookings Institute, 17May. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/05/17-global-poverty-trends-chandy.
22. Chen KHAsia as Method: Towards Deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2010:.
23. Chestnut S,Johnston AGlobal Giant: Is China Changing the Rules of the Game?. Paus EPrime PWestern J, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:237-259.
24. Collier P,Nicolaïdis K.Europe, Africa and EPAs: opportunity or car-crash?.Open Democracy. 2008;:.
25. Conrad S,Sachsenmaier SCompeting Visions of World Order: Global Moments and Movements, 1880s-1930s. New York: Palgrave; 2007:.
26. Cooper FColonialisms in Question. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2005:.
27. Dallmayr FBeyond Orientalism: Essays on Cross-Cultural Encounter. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 1996:.
28. Darby P.Pursuing the political: a post-colonial rethinking of relations international.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2004;33 (1): 1-32.
29. De Alva JAfter Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacements. Prakash G, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995:241-275.
30. Del Casino V,Hanna S.Beyond the 'binaries': a methodological intervention for interrogating maps as representational practices.ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies. 2006;4 (1): 34-56.
31. Diez T.Normative power as hegemony.Cooperation and Conflict. 2013;48 (2): 194-210.
32. Duara P.Asia redux: conceptualizing a region for our times.Journal of Asian Studies. 2010;69 (4): 963-983.
33. Elgström O.Outsiders' perceptions of the European Union in international trade negotiations.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007;45 (4): 949-967.
34. Elgström O.Images of the EU in EPA negotiations: angel, demon - or just human?.European Integration Online Papers: EIOP. 2008;12 (5): 1-12.
35. Ferguson NEmpire. London: Penguin; 2003:.
36. Fisher Onar N.Echoes of a universalism lost: contesting the Ottomans in today's Turkey.Middle Eastern Studies. 2009a;45 (2): 229-241.
37. Fisher Onar NMediterranean Frontiers: Borders, Conflict, and Memory. Bechev DNicolaïdis K, ed. London: I.B. Tauris; 2009b:57-68.
38. Fisher Onar NWhat Future for Human Rights in a Non-Western World. Bennett SO'Brien É, ed. London: Human Rights Consortium, University of London; 2012:51-62.
39. Fisher Onar N.Historical legacies in rising powers: towards a (Eur)Asian approach.Critical Asian Studies. 2013;45 (2):.
40. Fisher Onar NEchoes of Imperialism: The Present of Europe's Colonial Pasts. Nicolaïdis KSebe B, ed. 2014:.
41. Fisher Onar N,Evin AEuropean Stories: Intellectual Debates on Europe in National Contexts. Lacroix JNicolaïdis K, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:294-314.
42. Fisher Onar N,Muftuler-Bac M.The adultery and headscarf debates in Turkey: fusing 'EU-niversal' and alternative modernities?.Women's Studies International Forum. 2011;34 (5): 378-389.
43. Fisher Onar N,Paker H.Towards cosmopolitan citizenship? Women's rights in divided Turkey.Theory and Society. 2012;41 (3): 375-394.
44. Hansen P.European integration, European identity, and the colonial connection.European Journal of Social Theory. 2002;5 (4): 483-498.
45. Hansen P,Jonsson S.Demographic colonialism: EU-African migration management and the legacy of Eurafrica.Globalizations. 2011;8 (3): 261-276.
46. Hansen P,Jonsson SEchoes of Colonialisms: The Present of Europe's Pasts. Nicolaïdis K, ed. 2014:.
47. Historical Sociology and International Relations. Hobden SHobson J, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
48. Hobson JThe Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
49. Hobson J.Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphalian towards a post-racist critical IR.Review of International Studies. 2007;33:91-116.
50. Hobson J.Provincializing Westphalia: the eastern origins of sovereignty.International Politics. 2009;46:671-690.
51. Hoffman S.An American social science: international relations.Daedalus. 1977;106 (3): 41-60.
52. Holland M,Chaban NThe European Union and the Asia Pacific: Media, Public, and Elite Perceptions of the EU. New York: Routledge; 2009:.
53. Hooper B,Kramsch O.Post-colonising Europe: the geopolitics of globalisation, empire and borders: here and there, now and then.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2007;98 (4): 526-534.
54. Hurd E.The political authority of secularism in international relations.European Journal of International Relations. 2004;10 (2): 235-262.
55. Hurrell A.Hegemony, liberalism, and global order: what space for would-be great powers.International Affairs. 2006;82:1-19.
56. In KJ.Academic dependency: western-centrism in Korean political science.Korea Journal. 2006;46 (4): 115-135.
57. Jones E,Weinhardt CEchoes of Colonialisms: The Present of Europe's Pasts. Nicolaïdis K, ed. in press:.
58. Kagan ROf Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Knopf; 2003:.
59. Kavalski E.The struggle for recognition of normative powers: normative power Europe and normative power China in context.Cooperation and Conflict. 2013;48 (2): 247-267.
60. Keene EBeyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Order, and Colonialism in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
61. Kleinfeld R,Nicolaïdis KRelocating the Rule of Law. Gianluigi PWalker N, ed. Oxford: Hart; 2008:.
62. KlimaneDFontaineR (2012) Global swing states: Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey, and the future of international order. German Marshall Fund, 27November. Available at: http://www.gmfus.org/archives/global-swing-states-brazil-india-indonesia-turkey-and-the-future-of-international-order/.
63. Korosteleva EThe European Union and its Eastern Neighbours: Towards a More Ambitious Partnership?. New York: Routledge; 2012:.
64. Krubein FWhat Future for Human Rights in a Non-Western World. Bennett SO'Brien É, ed. London: Human Rights Consortium, University of London; 2012:147-158.
65. Lisbonne-de Vergeron KContemporary Indian Views of Europe. London: Chatham House; 2006:.
66. Loomba AColonialism/Postcolonialism. New York: Routledge; 1998:.
67. Lucarelli S.The European Union in the eyes of others: towards filling a gap in the literature.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2007;12 (3): 249-270.
68. Lucarelli S,Fioramonti LExternal Perceptions of the European Union as a Global Actor. New York: Routledge; 2010:.
69. MacDonald P,Parent J.Graceful decline? The surprising success of great power retrenchment.International Security. 2011;35 (4): 7-44.
70. Magnette P,Nicolaïdis KThe EU and Global Governance. Telò M, ed. New York: Routledge; 2009:381-404.
71. Manners I.Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002;40 (2): 235-258.
72. Manners INormative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Whitman R, ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2011:226-277.
73. Mayall J.Non-western international relations theory.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2011;11:331-338.
74. Mayer H.The long legacy of Dorian Gray: why the European Union needs to redefine its role in global affairs.European Integration. 2008;30 (1): 7-25.
75. Merry SE.Law and colonialism: review essay.Law & Society Review. 1991;25:4.
76. Morozov V,Rumelili B.The external constitution of European identity: Russia and Turkey as Europe-makers.Cooperation and Conflict. 2012;47 (1): 28-48.
77. Mowitt J.In the wake of Eurocentrism: an introduction.Cultural Critique. 2001;47:3-15.
78. Nayak M,Selbin EDecentering International Relations. New York: Zed; 2010:.
79. Neumann I.Russia as Europe's other.Journal of Area Studies. 1998;6 (12): 26-73.
80. Nicolaïdis KTurkish Foreign Policy. Keridis D, ed. Bassey's; 2001:.
81. Nicolaïdis KColonialism et postcolonialism en Méditerranée. Fabre T, ed. Marseille: Parenthèses; 2004a:.
82. Nicolaïdis KBeyond Paradise and Power: Europe, America, and the Future of a Troubled Partnership. Lindberg T, ed. London: Routledge; 2004b:91-120.
83. NicolaïdisK (2008) Southern barbarians? A post-colonial critique of EU-niversalism. Unpublished paper, DPIR colloquium, May (To be published in NicolaïdisKSebeBMaasGEchoes of Colonialisms: The Present of Europe's Pasts).
84. Nicolaïdis K.Sustainable integration: towards EU 2.0?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2010;48 (Annual Review): 21-54.
85. Nicolaïdis K,Howse R.'This is my EUtopia.': narrative as power.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002;40 (4): 767-792.
86. Nicolaïdis K,Nicolaïdis DThe Convergence of Civilisations? Constructing a Mediterranean Region. Adler EBicchi FCrawford B, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:337-338.
87. Nicolaïdis K,Sebe B,Maas G.Echoes of Colonialisms: The Present of Europe's Past. 2014;:.
88. Orakzai SBWhat Future for Human Rights in a Non-Western World. Bennett SO'Brien É, ed. London: Human Rights Consortium, University of London; 2012:77-88.
89. Qin Y.Why is there no Chinese international relations theory?.International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007;7 (3): 313-340.
90. Rao RThird World Protest: Between Home and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
91. Sadri H.An Islamic perspective on non-alignment: Iranian foreign policy in theory and practice.Journal of Third World Studies. 1999;16 (20): 29-46.
92. Seth S.Historical sociology and postcolonial theory: two strategies for challenging Eurocentrism.International Political Sociology. 2009;2 (3): 334-338.
93. Shani G.Towards a post-western IR: the Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory.International Studies Review. 2008;10 (4): 772-734.
94. Shepard TThe Invention of Decolonisation: The Algerian War and the Remaking of France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2006:.
95. Smith S.The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?.British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2000;2 (3): 374-402.
96. Sparke M.Everywhere but always somewhere: critical geographies of the global south.The Global South. 2007;1 (1/2): 117-126.
97. Spivak G.Righting wrongs.South Atlantic Quarterly. 2004;103 (2/3): 523-581.
98. Suzuki S.Japan's socialisation into Janus-faced European International Society.European Journal of International Relations. 2005;11 (1): 137-164.
99. Teitel RTransitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
100. Tickner A.Seeing IR differently: notes from the third world.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2003;32 (1): 295-324.
101. International Relations Scholarship Across the World. Tickner AWaever O, ed. New York: Routledge; 2010:.
102. Usul AR.Academia and the legitimising of international politics: studies of democratisation and world politics.Third World Quarterly. 2011;32 (9): 1691-1702.
103. Whitman R,Wolff SThe European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective: Context, Implementation and Impact. London: Palgrave; 2010:.
104. Wilkinson C.The Copenhagen School on tour in Kyrgyzstan: is securitisation theory useable outside Europe?.Security Dialogue. 2007;38 (5): 5-25.
105. Wolff S,Pace M.Workshop: Europe's legacy? From colonialism to democracy promotion: the case of the Mediterranean.Mediterranean Politics. 2007;12 (3): 431-434.
106. Youngs RThe European Union and the Promotion of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002:.