Computer-assisted versus manual TKA: No difference in clinical or functional outcomes at 5-year follow-up

Orthopedics

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Yaffe, Mark ^a   Chan, Philip ^a   Goyal, Nitin ^a   Luo, Michael ^a   Cayo, Max ^a   Stulberg, S David ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northshore Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE IMPLANT; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANUAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MECHANICAL AXIS; MECHANICS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UCLA ACTIVITY SCORE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; JOINT INSTABILITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84878637178     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130426-26     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5):682-687. (Pubitemid 39077216)
2. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(3):372-377. (Pubitemid 38559489)
3. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5):618-626. (Pubitemid 41073476)
4. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(3):282-288. (Pubitemid 40460792)
5. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87(7):645-652. (Pubitemid 33111276)
6. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(6):830-835. (Pubitemid 36986842)
7. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (426):180-186. (Pubitemid 39167127)
8. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (433):152-159. (Pubitemid 40489263)
9. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):261-269. (Pubitemid 46214342)
10. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8):1097-1106. (Pubitemid 350216994)
11. Hiscox CM, Bohm ER, Turgeon TR, Hedden DR, Burnell CD. Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(8):1259-1264.
12. Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ. Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems. J Arthroplasty . 2011; 26(8):1285-1290.
13. Barrett WP, Mason JB, Moskal JT, Dalury DF, Oliashirazi A, Fisher DA. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(8):1273e1-1284e1.
14. Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M, Oelsch C, von Strempel A. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; (460):178-184. (Pubitemid 47056495)
15. Martin A, von Strempel A. Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; (449):275-282. (Pubitemid 44231820)
16. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):131-139. (Pubitemid 39506164)
17. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):236-243. (Pubitemid 46214339)
18. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(4):477-480. (Pubitemid 46851126)
19. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; (457):156-162. (Pubitemid 46573409)
20. Stulberg SD, Yaffe MA, Koo SS. Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(suppl 4):47-54. (Pubitemid 44901973)
21. Hoffart HE, Langenstein E, Vasak N. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(2):194-199.
22. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, et al. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7):1107-1112.
23. Hernandez-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S. Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(12):3436-3442.
24. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop. 2009; 33(6):1567-1570.
25. Molfetta L, Caldo D. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee. 2008; 15(2):75-79.
26. Yaffe MA, Koo SS, Stulberg SD. Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb alignment do not correlate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11):2736-2744.
27. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(4):958-965.
28. Ghanem E, Pawasarat I, Lindsay A, et al. Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(14):2445-2451.
29. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(12):1856-1864.
30. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
31. Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, et al. Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(1):20-32.
32. Brouwer RW, Jakma TS, Brouwer KH, Verhaar JA. Pitfalls in determining knee alignment: a radiographic cadaver study. J Knee Surg. 2007; 20(3):210-215.
33. Hunt MA, Fowler PJ, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR. Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment. Can J Surg. 2006; 49(6):401-406. (Pubitemid 44955193)
34. Lonner JH, Laird MT, Stuchin SA. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331):102-106. (Pubitemid 26357693)