Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: A case-controlled study

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2006, Pages 47-54

  Stulberg, S David ^a   Yaffe, Mark A ^a   Koo, Samuel S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; PITCAIRN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 33845417222     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200604002-00010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682-7.
2. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372-7.
3. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:618-26.
4. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-8.
5. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152-9.
6. Jenny JY, Boeri C. [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:645-52. French.
7. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-5.
8. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180-6.
9. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:177-84.
10. Stulberg SD, Sarin V. The use of a navigation system to assist ligament balancing in TKR. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 2001 July 6-8; Pittsburgh, PA.
11. Noble PC, Sugano N, Johnston JD, Thompson MT, Conditt MA, Engh CA Sr, Mathis KB. Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:242-52.
12. Yaffe MA, Koo S, Feinglass JM, Stulberg SD. Lack of correlation between post-operative radiographic and intra-operative navigation measurement of limb implants. Read at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 2006 June 21-24; Montreal, Canada.