Randomized Trial of Computer-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: Impact on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1259-1264

  Hiscox, Christina M ^a   Bohm, Eric R ^b   Turgeon, Thomas R ^b   Hedden, David R ^b   Burnell, Colin D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alignment; Computer assisted; Knee arthroplasty; Knee replacement; Navigation; Outcome

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; WESTERN ONTARIO MACMASTER OSTEOARTHRITIS SCORE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80755132254     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Robertsson O., Dunbar M., Pehrsson T., et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71:262.
2. Scuderi G.R., Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., et al. The impact of femoral component rotational alignment on condylar lift-off. Clin Orthop 2003, 148.
3. Lidgren L., Knutson K., Robbertsson O. Annual Report 2004-The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 2004, 12. Lund, Sweden.
4. Krugluger J., Steinwenter A., Knahr K. Uncemented Miller-Galante total knee replacement. The influence of alignment on clinical and radiological outcome in a 5 to 8-year follow-up. Int Orthop 1998, 22:230.
5. Barrack R.L., Schrader T., Bertot A.J., et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001, 46.
6. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., et al. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998, 144.
7. Cornell C.N., Ranawat C.S., Burstein A.H. A clinical and radiographic analysis of loosening of total knee arthroplasty components using a bilateral model. J Arthroplasty 1986, 1:157.
8. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994, 153.
9. Cates H.E., Ritter M.A., Keating E.M., et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1993, 32.
10. Olcott C.W., Scott R.D. Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 2000, 13:166.
11. Sakoda H., Voice A.M., McEwen H.M., et al. A comparison of the wear and physical properties of silane cross-linked polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:1018.
12. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85:830.
13. Stulberg S.D., Loan P., Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(Suppl 2):90.
14. Jenny J.Y., Miehlke R.K., Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008, 15:80.
15. Hewitt B., Shakespeare D. A straightforward method of assessing the accuracy of implantation of knee prostheses. Knee 2001, 8:139.
16. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991, 73:709.
17. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.Y., et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:618.
18. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
19. Ware J.E. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute 1993, New England Medical Centre, Boston.
20. Dupont W.D., Plummer W.D. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 1990, 11:116.
21. Victor J., Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 131.
22. Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuch J., et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:282.
23. Stockl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 180.
24. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:372.
25. Matziolis G., Krocker D., Weiss U., et al. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:236.
26. Bauwens K., Matthes G., Wich M., et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:261.
27. Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., et al. Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2004, 28:87.