Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 449, Issue , 2006, Pages 275-282

  Martin, Arno ^a,b   Von Strempel, A ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FREE NAVIGATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE PAIN; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SOFT TISSUE; SURVIVAL TIME; TIBIA FRACTURE; TIME; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33747176588     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218738.69247.d8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: a technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1331-1334.
2. Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:178-183.
3. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Luring C, Kalteis T, Grifka J. CT-based and CT-free navigation for total knee arthroplasty: results of a prospective study. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106:935-940.
4. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Perlick C, Grifka J. Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004;28:87-90.
5. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Luring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:682-687.
6. Brys DA, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. A comparison of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;263:175-179.
7. Cates HE, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Intramedullary versus extramedullary femoral alignment systems in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:32-39.
8. Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement: a controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:818-823.
9. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique: a randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:372-377.
10. Dennis DA. Principles of total knee arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1991;2:2-11.
11. Fuiko R, Kotten B, Zettl R, Ritschl P. The accuracy of palpation from orientation points for the navigated implantation of knee prostheses. Orthopade. 2004;33:338-343.
12. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:152-159.
13. Hvid I, Nielsen S. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:160-165.
14. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-14.
15. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709-714.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:74-77.
17. Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T. Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002;10:194-197.
18. Löer I, Plitz W. Tibial malalignment of mobile-bearing prostheses: a simulator study. Orthopade. 2003;32:296-304.
19. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJ, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:635-640.
20. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation-preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001;139:109-116.
21. Nabeyama R, Matsuda S, Miura H, Mawatari T, Kawano T, Iwamoto Y. The accuracy of image-guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:366-371.
22. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation: initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106:941-948.
23. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:464-470.
24. Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3:67-72.
25. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:168-173.
26. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:153-156.
27. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:503-513.
28. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure: results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18-28.
29. Sheinkop MB. Feedback™ - Clinical Outcomes Program. Total Knee Arthroplasty Device Outcomes Study. Annual Report 2003. Warsaw, IN: Zimmer Inc; 2004.
30. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-835.
31. Stöckl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180-186.
32. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF. Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:246-252.
33. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:106-110.
34. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr. The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:117-121.
35. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:131-139.
36. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR. Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:721-723.